The Agenda Being Pushed: the Normalization of Sex with Children

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
Are you aware of this?
Are you comfortable hearing this?

USA Today had an op-ed piece supporting pro pedophilia.
Tik Tok is filled with Liberals debating such a demonic agenda.
Professors pushing this evil.
A few screenshots below as evidence.

“They” want to normalize sex with children.

Where do all these missing kids go?
Ever wonder that?

Please don’t stick your head in the sand.

And dare I say- if you consume pornography- you are one step away from being a part of the problem.

Have you seen the truth come out about Playboy and Hugh Hefner?
Beyond troubling.
Screenshot below. 7DB6D5BC-C8CC-4D68-817F-2AE931E250FA.png 2D1A9D07-B163-405F-AA9D-B8BDFF33A1E8.png


This post is a PSA of sorts.
If you read this far- now you can’t say you never knew.

5E9F8127-F7C4-42B4-92FF-B3775E5078CC.png 1A517207-DFAD-48EC-984B-176AFE18E960.png
 
OP
Peatful

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
OP
Peatful

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
Here’s Satan with young children:
0D3D107C-B36C-4BA4-B092-AAB21908EBEE.png
 

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
Yep, being speaking about this since the Epstein saga, they are currently readjusting the language, MAPS for example is now being used for paedo's.
The ruling class are trying to legalise it to cover up their pathological child abuse and avoid prosecution.

The one argument that undermines them all is the prefrontal cortex in development, anyone with a higher capacitance than another has the potential to behave like a predator, they will never bring up the prefrontal cortex in the paedophile argument, terms like pederast should be scrapped, teens are still developing the prefrontal cortex, again it was language shifting to normalise the pathology of a predator.

This new left are also guided by the works of Michael Foucault who was a paedophile, I've covered all this on here, its clears as day their is an attempt to normalise it, even if it doesn't work it still good cover for the ongoing corruption of the banking system.
The banks are the axiom all of this spirals around.
 
OP
Peatful

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
Yep, being speaking about this since the Epstein saga, they are currently readjusting the language, MAPS for example is now being used for paedo's.
The ruling class are trying to legalise it to cover up their pathological child abuse and avoid prosecution.

The one argument that undermines them all is the prefrontal cortex in development, anyone with a higher capacitance than another has the potential to behave like a predator, they will never bring up the prefrontal cortex in the paedophile argument, terms like pederast should be scrapped, teens are still developing the prefrontal cortex, again it was language shifting to normalise the pathology of a predator.

This new left are also guided by the works of Michael Foucault who was a paedophile, I've covered all this on here, its clears as day their is an attempt to normalise it, even if it doesn't work it still good cover for the ongoing corruption of the banking system.
The banks are the axiom all of this spirals around.
It’s blatant and shockingly bold lately- like it’s slowly being unleashed.

This is great data. Thank you.
 

Perry Staltic

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2020
Messages
8,186
I don’t see the exact article you may be pointing me towards.
Is it obvious- and im just missing it?

If it has to do with child sex rings and children being sacrificed- then- yes- they are spot on.

I was just pointing to a resource that reveals where all of the missing children are likely ending up.
 

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
It’s blatant and shockingly bold lately- like it’s slowly being unleashed.

This is great data. Thank you.
Be vocal with it, its basic logic that makes perfect sense so it spreads easily, simple logic has a memetic effect, its also a simple refutation, check mate, keep it simple.
 

rothko

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
198
those are the most wild videos ive ever seen. how do you not kill yourself? does he have a family? lol i cant imagine being his wife. im in awe. i mean i know ppl push this, but wow. everytime it floors me
 
OP
Peatful

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
those are the most wild videos ive ever seen. how do you not kill yourself? does he have a family? lol i cant imagine being his wife. im in awe. i mean i know ppl push this, but wow. everytime it floors me
The police or FBI need to check his computer- don’t you think?
 

JamesGatz

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2021
Messages
3,189
Location
USA
I'm guessing the elites grow tired of sneaking around to indulge in their fantasies with minors and would like to move it out to the open without being judged by the commoners - their push for pedophilia is getting increasingly more aggressive.
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
The police or FBI need to check his computer- don’t you think?

The police and FBI are in on it, at least the people at the very top. Remember Paul Krugman - one of the leaders of the new "left" - had child porn found on his computer? Guess what, he simply said "oh, hackers put it there". No investigation, no nothing, even though by law his computer has to be seized and analyzed and he has to be formally deposed/interrogated under oath.

Only the most egregious cases will be prosecuted and even then, most of the trial would be staged in such a way as to produce minimal "news"/noise, most of the really damning evidence is never presented, and eventually the verdict is a nothingburger. @Drareg and I have been following the Maxwell trial and guess what - it basically went away and no MSM outlet is talking about it any more despite the fact that this was supposedly a pedophilia ring spanning the globe, had intel agencies involved (proven beyond doubt), and had the potential star defendant/witness promptly "suicided" under laughably obvious non-suicide circumstances. Quietly, without almost any coverage in MSM, even the cases against the guards that were supposed to watch Epstein but left their posts were recently dropped. No explanation why, no outrage by the media about this obvious coverup. As far as MSM and the elite is concerned, the entire thing is all but forgotten.

I still have some hopes for the Prince Andrew case, but I suspect he may suffer an unfortunate accident or heart attack before his case goes to trial. He definitely knows at least as much as Epstein about the whole thing and can actually bring the entire British monarchy down if he talks too much. So, he is basically waiting for his Diana "accident", IMO. Speaking of her, my personal suspicion is that Diana knew members of the royal family were hardcore pedos (and probably tortured kids to death too, like that Belgian sicko Dutroux testified), and threatened them with exposure if they don't leave her alone. But poor Diana did not know that once you join the Royal Family, they won't let you go...alive, that is.
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
yeah i was going to say. Id eat my tongue if he didnt have illegal photos on his computer or did it. One or the other

It won't matter, the DOJ chooses who they prosecute and who they don't. See by post above about Krugman. He publicly admitted (or got caught?) having child porn on his computer and nothing happened - in direct violation of both federal and state (NY) laws in regards to proven/admitted child porn possession.
 

rothko

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
198
It won't matter, the DOJ chooses who they prosecute and who they don't. See by post above about Krugman. He publicly admitted (or got caught?) having child porn on his computer and nothing happened - in direct violation of both federal and state (NY) laws in regards to proven/admitted child porn possession.
i was just speaking informally. to be honest, im not sure you could have warrant to start an investigation off his words. hes a professor, he can say morally he thinks its not bad. i dont think thats cause
 

rothko

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
198
I am just saying, if i had a crystal ball. and he didnt do one of those. id eat my tongue
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,798
Location
USA / Europe
i was just speaking informally. to be honest, im not sure you could have warrant to start an investigation off his words. hes a professor, he can say morally he thinks its not bad. i dont think thats cause

His "security team" (probably just the network security admins at NYT) confirmed his computer had child porn on it.
"...Claims "security team" told him his IP address was downloading child porn..."

By both NY state and federal laws, this is evidence of child porn possession. At a minimum, by law his computer must be seized, forensically examined, and Krugman (and the network admin team) deposed/interrogated. None of that seems to have happened. Actually, his "security team" is not even allowed to verify that the media his "computer" (aka Mr. Krugman himself) is downloading is actual child porn, because that itself is considered "accessing" child porn (unless directly authorized by proper authorities). His "team" is required to contact authorities, report (under penalty of perjury) seeing evidence of possession of child porn, regardless of whether it is intentional or accidental (due to hacking), and then the authorities take it from there.
Just think about it for a second - a Nobel laureate publicly admits of having child porn on his computer (regardless of how HE CLAIMS it got there), his security/admin team confirms it, and...nothing happens.
 
Last edited:

rothko

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
198
@haidut I was talking about the professor from Fredonia -- I dont know about the Krugman incident -- i dont doubt youre right on that case (just never looked into it)
 
OP
Peatful

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
It won't matter, the DOJ chooses who they prosecute and who they don't. See by post above about Krugman. He publicly admitted (or got caught?) having child porn on his computer and nothing happened - in direct violation of both federal and state (NY) laws in regards to proven/admitted child porn possession.
Chris Hansen has left the chat.

Unfortunately, all you have summarized is true.
I’ve seen the police testimonies of their fraternal order and allegiance to freemasonry or the likes.
Even Justice Roberts has ties to Epstein- his plane to fantasy island, right?
 
Back
Top Bottom