Ireland Set to Pass “Hate Speech” Laws – Will Make Possessing “Hateful” Content on Your Devices a Jailable Offense

[Serge]

The article

The gist: if you have hateful material on your digital device, you can go to prison unless you can prove you didn't intend to use the material to spread hate. How do you know if the material was "hateful"? Look in the mirror, if you are wearing a prison robe, it was.

 

[joaquin]

The article

The gist: if you have hateful material on your digital device, you can go to prison unless you can prove you didn't intend to use the material to spread hate. How do you know if the material was "hateful"? Look in the mirror, if you are wearing a prison robe, it was.

The only remedy is to stop using digital devices. Because everything is hateful.

 

[grapes]

Vote for other party / government ?

 

[Serge]

Vote for other party / government ?

It looks like this democratic right has been found an antidote to. All people throw sheets of paper in an urn, on a daily basis. At least if the bowel movement is healthy. But it gives power only over the toilet, why would voting be different...

 

[grapes]

It looks like this democratic right has been found an antidote to. All people throw sheets of paper in an urn, on a daily basis. At least if the bowel movement is healthy. But it gives power only over the toilet, why would voting be different...

Sure current Representative democracy is a fraud. People should unite and change this system. I think Ireland is still monocultural country so maybe you are able to do that.

 

[michael94]

Noticing who is committing a crime is being put on the level of actually committing the crime itself. And you will actually get more negative media attention for it. This system is absolutely evil.

 

[area51puy]

It a WEF tactic to control speech. It’s the slippery slope to internet censorship. They are putting various versions of this law all around Europe. It stared with Covid and now they are moving to “hate speech” in the guise of protecting people.

And ultimately the want to combine it CBDC to create a social credit score system like the have in China.

 

[michael94]

It a WEF tactic to control speech. It’s the slippery slope to internet censorship. They are putting various versions of this law all around Europe. It stared with Covid and now they are moving to “hate speech” in the guise of protecting people.

And ultimately the want to combine it CBDC to create a social credit score system like the have in China.

There are no laws on the books against criticizing the WEF.

On the other hand anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial do have laws on the books in much of Europe, for decades. This didn't start with Covid.

The recent wave of "Hate Speech" laws are intended to silence anyone who is pushing back against Ireland being flooded with migrants

 

[Don]

There are no laws on the books against criticizing the WEF.

On the other hand anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial do have laws on the books in much of Europe, for decades. This didn't start with Covid.

The recent wave of "Hate Speech" laws are intended to silence anyone who is pushing back against Ireland being flooded with migrants

Yes I agree the whole migrant thing is for sure the issue in EU.

 

[Sheik]

Let's send a ton of migrants to Ireland and when people (inevitably) have something to say about it, we'll arrest THEM for "inciting violence".

Never mind the people responsible for sending the immigrants there. They did nothing to cause the problem.

 

[area51puy]

You are not getting it. This why the elites have so much power. They don’t give a **** about immigrants or protecting their feelings. They want to control the internet and what people can say on it. So they implement laws claiming they are trying to stop hate speech and in your country they say are stop anti-immigrant speech.

And they are putting various versions of this law around Europe and using corporations to control speech in America.

They ultimately want to make it illegal to criticize the government or certain officials like they have in China where even a billionaire could be disappeared for criticizing the government. But they start with ***t like this and slowly implement stronger restrictions on speech.

You are fighting a monkey tribal battle! They are out for world control and domination.

World Economic Forum supports merger of human and AI systems to censor “hate speech” - Gulf Insider

Despite the fact that no one asked, the World Economic Forum is now advocating for the merger of hum

www.gulf-insider.com

World Economic Forum supports merger of human and AI systems to censor “hate speech”​

Despite the fact that no one asked, the World Economic Forum is now advocating for the merger of human and artificial intelligence systems to censor “hate speech” and “misinformation” online before it is even allowed to be posted.

A report published to the official WEF website ominously warns about the peril of “the dark world of online harms.”

But the globalist body, run by comic book Bond villain Klaus Schwab, has a solution.

They want to merge the ‘best’ aspects of human censorship and AI machine learning algorithms to ensure that people’s feelings don’t get hurt and counter-regime opinions are blacklisted.

“By uniquely combining the power of innovative technology, off-platform intelligence collection and the prowess of subject-matter experts who understand how threat actors operate, scaled detection of online abuse can reach near-perfect precision,” states the article.

After engaging in a whole host of mumbo jumbo, the article concludes by proposing “a new framework: rather than relying on AI to detect at scale and humans to review edge cases, an intelligence-based approach is crucial.”

“By bringing human-curated, multi-language, off-platform intelligence into learning sets, AI will then be able to detect nuanced, novel abuses at scale, before they reach mainstream platforms. Supplementing this smarter automated detection with human expertise to review edge cases and identify false positives and negatives and then feeding those findings back into training sets will allow us to create AI with human intelligence baked in,” the article rambles.

No doubt that a central part of such “misinformation” will be strident denunciation of the WEF itself, given that the organization is notorious for blocking its critics on Twitter.

Many would ask why the World Economic Forum, amidst a cost of living crisis, upcoming energy rationing and a global recession, is concerning itself with any of this.

Why don’t they just stick to the economy?

“It’s never a sure bet if this Davos-based elite’s mouthpiece comes up with its outlandish “solutions” and “proposals” as a way to reinforce existing, or introduce new narratives; or just to appear busy and earn its keep from those bankrolling it,” writes Didi Rankovic.

“No – it’s not the runaway inflation, energy costs, and even food security in many parts of the world. For how dedicated to globalization the organization is, it’s strangely tone-deaf to what is actually happening around the globe.”


U.S. will criminalize hate speech 'soon', EU official predicts at WEF mtg.

U.S. will criminalize hate speech ‘soon’, EU official predicts at WEF mtg.​

At the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland this week, a European Union official predicted to a U.S. congressman that the U.S. would “soon” enact laws on “illegal hate speech” similar to those in the EU.

Věra Jourová, the vice president of values and transparency for the European Commission, tapped Massachusetts Rep. Seth Moulton on the arm and laughed as she made the prediction. It came as she discussed whether AI is capable of moderating online hate speech.

And they to combine this CBDC where they also have control over your money.

So like in Canada you had the trucker protests over the vaccine mandates and they froze their bank accounts.

 

[area51puy]

View: https://youtu.be/MHm4DccNFOI

They are trying to pass a similar laws about misinformation in Brazil

New Law Sought by Brazil's Lula to Ban and Punish 'Fake News and Disinformation' Threatens the Free ...

Connect with Glenn and other members of Glenn Greenwald community

greenwald.locals.com

 

[area51puy]

Who Is A “Terrorist” In Biden’s America?

Far from being a war against “white supremacy,” the Biden administration’s new “domestic terror” strategy clearly targets primarily those who oppose US government overreach and those who oppose capitalism and/or globalization.

unlimitedhangout.com

Who Is A “Terrorist” In Biden’s America?​

Far from being a war against “white supremacy,” the Biden administration’s new “domestic terror” strategy clearly targets primarily those who oppose US government overreach and those who oppose capitalism and/or globalization.

In the latest sign that the US government’s War on Domestic Terror is growing in scope and scale, the White House on Tuesday revealed the nation’s first ever government-wide strategy for confronting domestic terrorism. While cloaked in language about stemming racially motivated violence, the strategy places those deemed “anti-government” or “anti-authority” on a par with racist extremists and charts out policies that could easily be abused to silence or even criminalize online criticism of the government.

Even more disturbing is the call to essentially fuse intelligence agencies, law enforcement, Silicon Valley, and “community” and “faith-based” organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League, as well as unspecified foreign governments, as partners in this “war,” which the strategy makes clear will rely heavily on a pre-crime orientation focused largely on what is said on social media and encrypted platforms. Though the strategy claims that the government will “shield free speech and civil liberties” in implementing this policy, its contents reveal that it is poised to gut both.

Indeed, while framed publicly as chiefly targeting “right-wing white supremacists,” the strategy itself makes it clear that the government does not plan to focus on the Right but instead will pursue “domestic terrorists” in “an ideologically neutral, threat-driven manner,” as the law “makes no distinction based on political view—left, right or center.” It also states that a key goal of this strategic framework is to ensure “that there is simply no governmental tolerance . . . of violence as an acceptable mode of seeking political or social change,” regardless of a perpetrator’s political affiliation.

Considering that the main cheerleaders for the War on Domestic Terror exist mainly in establishment left circles, such individuals should rethink their support for this new policy given that the above statements could easily come to encompass Black Lives Matter–related protests, such as those that transpired last summer, depending on which political party is in power.

Once the new infrastructure is in place, it will remain there and will be open to the same abuses perpetrated by both political parties in the US during the lengthy War on Terror following September 11, 2001. The history of this new “domestic terror” policy, including its origins in the Trump administration, makes this clear.

It’s Never Been Easier to Be a “Terrorist”​

In introducing the strategy, the Biden administration cites “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists” as a key reason for the new policy and a main justification for the War on Domestic Terror in general. This was most recently demonstrated Tuesday in Attorney General Merrick Garland’s statement announcing this new strategy. However, the document itself puts “anti-government” or “anti-authority” “extremists” in the same category as violent white supremacists in terms of being a threat to the homeland. The strategy’s characterization of such individuals is unsettling.

For instance, those who “violently oppose” “all forms of capitalism” or “corporate globalization” are listed under this less-discussed category of “domestic terrorist.” This highlights how people on the left, many of whom have called for capitalism to be dismantled or replaced in the US in recent years, could easily be targeted in this new “war” that many self-proclaimed leftists are currently supporting. Similarly, “environmentally-motivated extremists,” a category in which groups such as Extinction Rebellion could easily fall, are also included.

In addition, the phrasing indicates that it could easily include as “terrorists” those who oppose the World Economic Forum’s vision for global “stakeholder capitalism,” as that form of “capitalism” involves corporations and their main “stakeholders” creating a new global economic and governance system. The WEF’s stakeholder capitalism thus involves both “capitalism” and “corporate globalization.”

The strategy also includes those who “take steps to violently resist government authority . . . based on perceived overreach.” This, of course, creates a dangerous situation in which the government could, purposely or otherwise, implement a policy that is an obvious overreach and/or blatantly unconstitutional and then label those who resist it “domestic terrorists” and deal with them as such—well before the overreach can be challenged in court.

Another telling addition to this group of potential “terrorists” is “any other individual or group who engages in violence—or incites imminent violence—in opposition to legislative, regulatory or other actions taken by the government.” Thus, if the government implements a policy that a large swath of the population finds abhorrent, such as launching a new, unpopular war abroad, those deemed to be “inciting” resistance to the action online could be considered domestic terrorists.

Such scenarios are not unrealistic, given the loose way in which the government and the media have defined things like “incitement” and even “violence” (e. g., “hate speech” is a form of violence) in the recent past. The situation is ripe for manipulation and abuse. To think the federal government (including the Biden administration and subsequent administrations) would not abuse such power reflects an ignorance of US political history, particularly when the main forces behind most terrorist incidents in the nation are actually US government institutions like the FBI (more FBI examples here, here, here, and here).

Furthermore, the original plans for the detention of American dissidents in the event of a national emergency, drawn up during the Reagan era as part of its “continuity of government” contingency, cited popular nonviolent opposition to US intervention in Latin America as a potential “emergency” that could trigger the activation of those plans. Many of those “continuity of government” protocols remain on the books today and can be triggered, depending on the whims of those in power. It is unlikely that this new domestic terror framework will be any different regarding nonviolent protest and demonstrations.

Yet another passage in this section of the strategy states that “domestic terrorists” can, “in some instances, connect and intersect with conspiracy theories and other forms of disinformation and misinformation.” It adds that the proliferation of such “dangerous” information “on Internet-based communications platforms such as social media, file-upload sites and end-to-end encrypted platforms, all of these elements can combine and amplify threats to public safety.”

Thus, the presence of “conspiracy theories” and information deemed by the government to be “misinformation” online is itself framed as threatening public safety, a claim made more than once in this policy document. Given that a major “pillar” of the strategy involves eliminating online material that promotes “domestic terrorist” ideologies, it seems inevitable that such efforts will also “connect and intersect” with the censorship of “conspiracy theories” and narratives that the establishment finds inconvenient or threatening for any reason.

 

[michael94]

You are not getting it. This why the elites have so much power. They don’t give a **** about immigrants or protecting their feelings. They want to control the internet and what people can say on it. So they implement laws claiming they are trying to stop hate speech and in your country they say are stop anti-immigrant speech.

And they are putting various versions of this law around Europe and using corporations to control speech in America.

They ultimately want to make it illegal to criticize the government or certain officials like they have in China where even a billionaire could be disappeared for criticizing the government. But they start with ***t like this and slowly implement stronger restrictions on speech.

You are fighting a monkey tribal battle! They are out for world control and domination.

I think you are the one who doesn't get it.

"Tribalism" is exactly what the elites don't want, at least not for Whites. Any sort of Collective action Whites attempt is censored or shut down ruthlessly and the entire Government and Media apparatus is used to spread lies and slander against any such attempt. Whereas "Tribalism" and group organizing on the part of any other Race in White Countries does not receive this Tyrannical Treatment. Why?

Because the "Elites", better said Jews and their pawns, are carrying out a systematic destruction of White Countries and preach Anti-Racism and Integration in order to better establish their control over the directionless populous.

The WEF is indeed one part of the Jewish Agenda to move the West towards a more slave like existence economically, but you are ignoring the actions of the "Elite" which are unequivocally to stamp out any attempt at Whites preserving their countries or having any sort of Collective Will at all.

 

[michael94]

Here's the latest, watch the Video at the top of the news article. People passed out flyers criticizing the Jewish role in the Media or the degeneracy being spread at Disney and they passed this Anti-Semitism law in response.

Governor signs bill that targets hate crimes into law following Anti-Semitic incidents’ in Florida

Governor Ron DeSantis signed into law Thursday a bill that targets hate crimes following a series of recent anti-Semitic incidents' across Florida.

www.fox13news.com

 

[area51puy]

I think you are the one who doesn't get it.

"Tribalism" is exactly what the elites don't want, at least not for Whites. Any sort of Collective action Whites attempt is censored or shut down ruthlessly and the entire Government and Media apparatus is used to spread lies and slander against any such attempt. Whereas "Tribalism" and group organizing on the part of any other Race in White Countries does not receive this Tyrannical Treatment. Why?

Because the "Elites", better said Jews and their pawns, are carrying out a systematic destruction of White Countries and preach Anti-Racism and Integration in order to better establish their control over the directionless populous.

The WEF is indeed one part of the Jewish Agenda to move the West towards a more slave like existence economically, but you are ignoring the actions of the "Elite" which are unequivocally to stamp out any attempt at Whites preserving their countries or having any sort of Collective Will at all.

Like I said they will win, we are just monkeys fighting over stupid ***t and they are advanced humans and they are messing with us like we are monkeys in a zoo.

Just keep fighting with some idiot antifa, liberal blue haired idiot over bs and soon you will get your internet license and your CBDC bucks.

The thing you don’t get is they see themselves as the elites and you’re just a serf useless eater.

This is thing you don’t get, they understand the human monkey and they create a problem, then say they have the solution.

They understand the human monkey is suspicious of the other. We fear what we don’t understand. They saw how the United States has used race relations over the past centuries to gain power and in a country where everyone is pro-dominantly the same skin color , same religion , same culture, same values it’s harder to divide and conquer. So they ship in the other to create tension and fear and then come in and claim they are trying to stop hate speech, but their real intentions are to control the internet, because they can no longer control the message. If they cannot control the message that threatens their power!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[michael94]

Like I said they will win, we are just monkeys fighting over stupid ***t and they are advanced humans and they are messing with us like we are monkeys in a zoo.

Just keep fighting with some idiot antifa, liberal blue haired idiot over bs and soon you will get your internet license and your CBDC bucks.

The thing you don’t get is they see themselves as the elites and you’re just a serf useless eater.

This is thing you don’t get, they understand the human monkey and they create a problem, then say they have the solution.

They understand the human monkey is suspicious of the other. We fear what we don’t understand. They saw how the United States has used race relations over the past centuries to gain power and in a country where everyone is pro-dominantly the same skin color , same religion , same culture, same values it’s harder to divide and conquer. So they ship in the other to create tension and fear and then come in and claim they are trying to stop hate speech, but their real intentions are to control the internet, because they can no longer control the message. If they cannot control the message that threatens their power!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I agree with you in general about them needing to control the message, but their actions show that they use their power and control to censor and slander White Group action and Groups critical of Jewish Power the hardest.

Calling it "monkey like" when you are trying to preserve your people from being destroyed and replaced only serves the Elite Agenda as evidenced by their actions and where most of their resources go - which is to combat White "tribalism" and Anti-Semitism.

 

[michael94]

If you like Documentaries I recommend The Greatest Story Never Told ( TGSNT.tv ) and Europa The Last Battle ( EuropaTheLastBattle.net ). A Last Appeal to Reason by The Impartial Truth is also good and shorter, on Bitchute.

If you don't fully understand why WW2 was fought and think it was just "Theater by the Elites" then it can be hard to understand what is going on now.

 

[area51puy]

I agree with you in general about them needing to control the message, but their actions show that they use their power and control to censor and slander White Group action and Groups critical of Jewish Power the hardest.

Calling it "monkey like" when you are trying to preserve your people from being destroyed and replaced only serves the Elite Agenda as evidenced by their actions and where most of their resources go - which is to combat White "tribalism" and Anti-Semitism.

There are many Jewish people with money pushing these laws, but they just use antisemitism to protect themselves. So if you criticize them they can just claim antisemitism to throw you in jail.

If they gave have a f about the average Jewish person why would they be the first and mandate 4 shots of the Pfizer poison on their population in Israel?

They know we are tribal and will use any which way they can to manipulate us.

They want you to believe it’s about race or religion or whatever.

And being in a ray peat forum I don’t see why people don’t understand how environment plays the greatest role in what someone becomes then the original race or what religion their parents were.

If you took a newborn baby from Jewish parents, a newborn baby from Ireland, a new born baby from America and sent them to be raised by a Chinese family and never told them their origins do you think they would be same if they were raised in their countries they were born in?

Their a billions of environmental factors that contribute to who a person will become.

 

[area51puy]

View: https://youtu.be/14eG8uoQ6cQ


This is a ex cia agent and at the 10 minute mark he describes how the cia develops a dossier on people they want to use to get information from foreign countries and it’s based on ages 0-7 7-13 13-25 The elites do the same with countries and their populations so they can try to manipulate and control those populations. But it is becoming harder and harder all the time with a free internet.

You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.

Abraham Lincoln

“It’s Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” – Mark Twain​