OP
LeeLemonoil
Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 4,265
That Big Tech and social media only waited for such a pretext like Capitol-Day to cleanse their services and platform of lots of conservative content forever is evident.
These days the question is, did they act on opportunity or did they fabricate the opportunity.
How the election and thereafter turned out, sometimes I can’t help but doubt if Covid wasn’t a deliberate release after all.
The timing was very convenient.
Would Covid have „broken out“ a year earlier than 19/20 then it might have been reigned in before the election. No mass mail-in ballots then.
Broken out one year later, meaning this winter. No influence on the election probably, as it only gains traction in winter.
But breaking out as it did:
Enough time to set in place absentee-election legislation.
Enough time to wreck the economy (though this didn’t Play out so with effects on voting against trump)
Enough time to have people masked and used to not gather and assemble. And to have legal pretext to prevent mass gatherings. Or at least portray mass demonstrations as borderline criminal and reckless (very useful in the aftermath of a compromised, dubious election)
And, regarding the vaccines. I can for the life of me no longer believe that they developed these new stable mRNA-stuff just now spot on to a pandemic.
For many years mRNA-vax didn’t work because of instabilitie issues and they manage it now in a rushed way?
No. They had the solution in their drawers for some time.
The one year-„Development“ is just a deniability hoax, just enough time to have people believe there actuary was a R&D period.
And hoe convenient to have vaccines ready to quench down a „pandemic“ when the administration of choice enters office
Hard to keep calm and steady these days
These days the question is, did they act on opportunity or did they fabricate the opportunity.
How the election and thereafter turned out, sometimes I can’t help but doubt if Covid wasn’t a deliberate release after all.
The timing was very convenient.
Would Covid have „broken out“ a year earlier than 19/20 then it might have been reigned in before the election. No mass mail-in ballots then.
Broken out one year later, meaning this winter. No influence on the election probably, as it only gains traction in winter.
But breaking out as it did:
Enough time to set in place absentee-election legislation.
Enough time to wreck the economy (though this didn’t Play out so with effects on voting against trump)
Enough time to have people masked and used to not gather and assemble. And to have legal pretext to prevent mass gatherings. Or at least portray mass demonstrations as borderline criminal and reckless (very useful in the aftermath of a compromised, dubious election)
And, regarding the vaccines. I can for the life of me no longer believe that they developed these new stable mRNA-stuff just now spot on to a pandemic.
For many years mRNA-vax didn’t work because of instabilitie issues and they manage it now in a rushed way?
No. They had the solution in their drawers for some time.
The one year-„Development“ is just a deniability hoax, just enough time to have people believe there actuary was a R&D period.
And hoe convenient to have vaccines ready to quench down a „pandemic“ when the administration of choice enters office
Hard to keep calm and steady these days