Morgan
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2016
- Messages
- 139
Well, that would be one thing that I disagree with Ray Peat on, and that's okay.. I have yet to see a single effective study in regards to sexuality and hormonal profiles, one will say too much testosterone leads to "bisexuality", another will say its progesterone, and then yet another will say its estrogen. The studies on this topic are much like the studies that promote PUFA as being something beneficial, they are structured for an intended result, or they are placed in reductive isolation to a multitude of other factors. It is interesting to me that we even need definitions for sexuality to begin with, that the possibility for humans to be fluid in their desire is somehow out of the question.. that they may even have a choice in the matter.Ray Peat says that elevated estrogen makes one prone to novelty seeking in sexuality, inability to be satisfied by hetero Normal romance, and desire for unorthodox sexual stimulation.
He also basically said by providing animal studies, homosexuality and sexual abnormalities are due to excess estrogen, if even over several generations or in utero.
Define for me what unorthodox sexual stimulation is? Who has or how would someone define this? Not only that, you are basically saying that the people I have fallen in love with are just "novelty" in regards to the intimacy that we shared. Yeah, no.
The dangers still exist even in so called "progressive" societies, it can still ruin your connection with you family even if you dearly love them, or ostracize you in some way depending on where you live; you have to endure, hear, and read all sorts of ridiculous nonsense directed towards you or towards someone you love.- Perhaps there were that many LGBT before, but the dangers of our past society prevented them from speaking their truth. Death was a real possibility for them (still is in some places), so survival instincts would ensure they stay quiet about it.
Last edited: