MAO-B inhibitor Rasagiline improves glucose metabolism in the brain (in Alzheimer’s patients)

KennethKaniff

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
64
Rasagiline is a MAO-B inhibitor currently used for Parkinson’s disease but appears to broadly cognition enhancing and neuroprotective. This may be mediated in whole or in part by metabolic effects. This study found improved glucose metabolism in the brain when administered to Alzheimer’s patients.

Background: A Phase II proof of concept (POC) randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor approved for Parkinson disease, in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). The primary objective was to determine if 1 mg of rasagiline daily for 24 weeks is associated with improved regional brain metabolism (fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography [FDG-PET]) compared to placebo. Secondary objectives included measurement of effects on tau PET and evaluation of directional consistency of clinical end points.
Methods: This was a double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, community-based, three-site trial of 50 participants randomized 1:1 to receive oral rasagiline or placebo (NCT02359552). FDG-PET was analyzed for the presence of an AD-like pattern as an inclusion criterion and as a longitudinal outcome using prespecified regions of interest and voxel-based analyses. Tau PET was evaluated at baseline and longitudinally. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) model.
Results: Fifty patients were randomized and 43 completed treatment. The study met its primary end point, demonstrating favorable change in FDG-PET differences in rasagiline versus placebo in middle frontal (P < 0.025), anterior cingulate (P < 0.041), and striatal (P < 0.023) regions. Clinical measures showed benefit in quality of life (P < 0.04). Digit Span, verbal fluency, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) showed non-significant directional favoring of rasagiline; no effects were observed in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) or activities of daily living. Rasagiline was generally well tolerated with low rates of adverse events and notably fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms in the active treatment group.
Discussion: These outcomes illustrate the potential benefits of rasagiline on clinical and neuroimaging measures in patients with mild to moderate AD. Rasagiline appears to affect neuronal activity in frontostriatal pathways, with associated clinical benefit potential warranting a more fully powered trial. This study illustrated the potential benefit of therapeutic repurposing and an experimental medicine proof-of-concept design with biomarkers to characterize patient and detect treatment response.

Full text: Rasagiline effects on glucose metabolism, cognition, and tau in Alzheimer's dementia
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
794
I notice this with Eugenol
 

golder

Member
Joined
May 10, 2018
Messages
2,851
Do we think we could extend this finding to its better known cousin Selegiline? I ask because I know these have slightly different MOA’s and Rasagiline doesn’t have the methamphetamine metabolite like selegiline.
 

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon
Last edited:
OP
K

KennethKaniff

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
64
Do we think we could extend this finding to its better known cousin Selegiline? I ask because I know these have slightly different MOA’s and Rasagiline doesn’t have the methamphetamine metabolite like selegiline.
Most likely, but I would prefer rasagiline as it doesn’t have the toxic amphetamine metabolites.
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
Most likely, but I would prefer rasagiline as it doesn’t have the toxic amphetamine metabolites.
Selegiline only has that metabolite when taken orally, not when take sublingually .

And even when taken orally I'm not sure that it's enough to matter .

It might actually be beneficial since microdosing amphetamines paradoxically resensitizes dopamine receptors.
 
OP
K

KennethKaniff

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
64
Selegiline only has that metabolite when taken orally, not when take sublingually .

And even when taken orally I'm not sure that it's enough to matter .

It might actually be beneficial since microdosing amphetamines paradoxically resensitizes dopamine receptors.
At least one study found that selegiline’s metabolites are counter-productive to its neuroprotective effects: Contrasting neuroprotective and neurotoxic actions of respective metabolites of anti-Parkinson drugs rasagiline and selegiline

Anecdotally, selegiline gives me a nervous & obsessive energy that rasagaline doesn’t. Selegiline does indeed feel like a small dose of amphetamine, for me.
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
Rasagiline? I’ve been taking 1mg daily, oral route. Same as this study. Above 1mg daily and you might start inhibiting MAO-A which I don’t want.
No I meant selegiline.
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
When I tried selegiline I took 5mg orally
You couldve tried sublingual to avoid the amphetamine metabolites.
But even when you have the amphetamine metabolites through oral administration, they are not a concern as per this review:

"In clinical trials, selegiline was found to be well tolerated with similar side effect profile to that of placebo and no amphetamine-related adverse events were observed (Shoulson 1992; Palhagen et al. 1998; Shoulson et al. 2002; Palhagen et al. 2006; Mizuno et al. 2017). The weaker psychotropic effect and dependence liability of R-amphetamines compared to the S-enantiomers were shown in several preclinical studies supporting the findings of the clinical reports (Nickel et al. 1994; Yasar et al. 1993)."

Having a bad reaction to selegiline might also be due to it's sigma 1 one agonism. Some people don't react well to it.
Pregnenolone and DHEA are sigma 1 agonists as well and some people don't react well to them.

"Behavioral reactions to σ-agonists are rather heterogeneous: some individuals find σ-receptor agonists euphoric with significant anti-depressive effects. Other individuals, however, experience dysphoria and often report feelings of malaise or anxiety."
- Sigma receptor - Wikipedia
 

golder

Member
Joined
May 10, 2018
Messages
2,851
Most likely, but I would prefer rasagiline as it doesn’t have the toxic amphetamine metabolites.
Same really. The small amphetamine metabolite only bothers me due to potential drug tests at work. I see more favourable anecdotal reports from selegiline rather than rasagiline though, although that could just be because it's less popular and well known. Subjectively, how do you think it compares to selegiline?
 
OP
K

KennethKaniff

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
64
Same really. The small amphetamine metabolite only bothers me due to potential drug tests at work. I see more favourable anecdotal reports from selegiline rather than rasagiline though, although that could just be because it's less popular and well known. Subjectively, how do you think it compares to selegiline?
Selegiline is older, more well known and more well researched.
In my totally subjective experience, selegiline and rasagiline are both very mild, but selegiline seemed to caused more anxiety and obsessive thoughts for me. I bought both in one order and only tried selegiline a few times before deciding I liked rasagiline better. YMMV
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom