Abortion Rights May 2022 and why this should matter to you

[Michael Mohn]

If a treatment for an acute or chronic disease that would save your life or the life of a loved one used aborted fetal cells I suspect you wouldn't use the word "evil" to describe it ...

If, would...

fact is abortion is the murder of a child,
fact is fetal cells are used to develop vaccines, a talisman of a pseudo scientific cult, doing more harm than good.
Both rituals of a satanic death cult.
Your life saving treatments are just deceptive marketing.

 

[tankasnowgod]

If a treatment for an acute or chronic disease that would save your life or the life of a loved one used aborted fetal cells I suspect you wouldn't use the word "evil" to describe it ...

A completely irrelevant argument. There are no such "treatments" that stem from "aborted" fetal cells, and there never will be. This comes down to the simple fact that the abortion itself kills the fetus, therefore rendering all such "fetal cells" completely useless for any sort of research.

The reality of "fetal" or "embryonic" cells used in research is much worse. They did not come from any "abortion," but instead, a live delivery of an infant. The infant was then murdered to harvest said cells, and it was the act of harvesting that ended the infant's life. For things like "Human Embryonic Kidney" cells, this is how they procured them. Not through abortion, but through a live delivery and subsequent infanticide.

So, this argument is ridiculous in the area of abortion. But, I guess you could make it if you wish to advance the idea of pure infanticide.

 

[Michael Mohn]

The reality of "fetal" or "embryonic" cells used in research is much worse. They did not come from any "abortion," but instead, a live delivery of an infant. The infant was then murdered to harvest said cells, and it was the act of harvesting that ended the infant's life. For things like "Human Embryonic Kidney" cells, this is how they procured them. Not through abortion, but through a live delivery and subsequent infanticide.

Nothing convinced me more about the morality of capital punishment.

This is the same procedure for making cultured/lab meat btw. They take a new born animal's blood and start to grow the cell cultures on this blood.

 

[Orome]

Reading some comments on social media is really killing it. For example:

If people like this reproduce I am not even sure what’s better for the unborn.

 

[JamesGatz]

I believe this Abortion mess is just another distraction that ABC intelligence agencies cooked up to distract us from the fact our food supply is getting obliterated. Abortion will be forced for their 2050 agenda so they're definitely bringing it back soon and with a vengeance

Isn't it hilarious that "Q" came back today too? Q is a just another clown intelligence agent sitting behind a computer getting paid to s***post to distract people from the food supply crisis

Every week i see another BS news story in the MSM that just reaks of ABC intelligence agency involvement - these intelligence agency c*nts just sit in a room brainstorming the biggest load of trash they can put out in the MSM to distract people

 

[Chad_Catholic]

Abortion has always been a polarizing issue in America. The overturning of R vs W simply returned the power to the state. This is a movie toward representative government and local and state power. Of course abortion is immoral, but since we have separation of church and state, no group has the right to impose its religious beliefs on the rest of us.

 

[Peatness]

I wonder what is motivating Clarence Thomas of the Anita Hill fame? If all of this is about pro life then I will be expecting him to be against vaccine mandates and the covid injections for children. I look forward to his support on these matters

 

[youngsinatra]

I am absolutely pro-life, but I am shocked that there is no exception for the case of rape. If I was a women, I would not want to breed the fruit of a devilish wicked act. It would cause severe psychological distress to me.

Nonetheless, viva cristo rey.

 

[Michael Mohn]

Abortion has always been a polarizing issue in America.

Has been everywhere. Sad US centrism.

Of course abortion is immoral, but since we have separation of church and state, no group has the right to impose its religious beliefs on the rest of us.

Do you mean the state should not impose morality and morality is only the domain of the church?
This is total nonsense! Even groups of people without a state and church have common morals on which they act.
We will impose morality on those who don't have morals.

 

[Michael Mohn]

I am absolutely pro-life, but I am shocked that there is no exception for the case of rape. If I was a women, I would not want to breed the fruit of a devilish wicked act. It would cause severe psychological distress to me.

Nonetheless, viva cristo rey.

There is the law and its enforcement.
A rape victim who kills the child certainly deserve a very mild sentence.
On the other hand if we leave open a legal door for abortion women will use it and we know that a lot of women don't hesitate to lie about rape and abuse.

 

[Perry Staltic]

View: https://twitter.com/bj_armbruster/status/1540361794614480896

 

[Perry Staltic]

since we have separation of church and state, no group has the right to impose its religious beliefs on the rest of us

There is no such thing. The constitution only prohibits the federal government from establishing a religion and preventing the exercise of one. The framers knew what it was like to live under a theocracy and be persecuted for their beliefs that deviated from state church doctrine.

 

[Perry Staltic]

If there is “my body my choice” in effect - upheld by the Supreme Court
How can I be forced to take a vxx and in turn - when noncompliant- it be found lawless?

This is a set up.

Please prove me wrong.

A pregnant woman is no longer one person, so it's no longer her body, her choice. She is responsible for another human being living inside of her, which means she can't make unilateral decisions (choice) regarding it's life. Vaccinations only affect individuals, so their bodies, their choice.

 

[Peatful]

A pregnant woman is no longer one person, so it's no longer her body, her choice. She is responsible for another human being living inside of her, which means she can't make unilateral decisions (choice) regarding it's life. Vaccinations only affect individuals, so their bodies, their choice.

Wonderfully logical.

Let’s see how it plays out.

I even heard (maybe here on the forum) that LGTBQ rights are being side-eyed?

Divide and conquer....

They want chaos. Hate. Division. You know...
Ordo ab chao.

 

[tankasnowgod]

I wonder what is motivating Clarence Thomas of the Anita Hill fame?

How ridiculous. He's "famous" for being one of the greatest conservative Supreme Court Justices of all time, after coming from humble beginnings, coming from a family of sharecroppers.

Do you even know what Anita Hill accused Clarence Thomas of? Simply telling a few dirty jokes and asking her out to dinner. That's it. Even if her "accusations" were 100% true, he stood accused of no crime, only something minorly inappropriate. Of course, there was no proof one way or the other. It's ridiculous that such things ever came up in a job interview, especially in a public forum.

In Thomas's own words, it was "a lynching for uppity blacks." And it is pretty clear he was correct. Don't forget, racist democrat Joe Biden led the witch hunt against this man.

If all of this is about pro life then I will be expecting him to be against vaccine mandates and the covid injections for children. I look forward to his support on these matters

He's already shown he's against vaccine mandates. He's a patriot through and through, and if you are interested in the man, you would do well to research him rather than just listening to the propaganda spit out by the people that are trying to smear him. It would be an apt thing to do, especially since he sits on a court (the highest one, in fact), and in court, they are sure to hear BOTH sides of the story. It's clear from your words you never even looked into him.

I don't think you truly understand the principles that the Republic was set up upon, either.

 

[Peatness]

How ridiculous. He's "famous" for being one of the greatest conservative Supreme Court Justices of all time, after coming from humble beginnings, coming from a family of sharecroppers.

Do you even know what Anita Hill accused Clarence Thomas of? Simply telling a few dirty jokes and asking her out to dinner. That's it. Even if her "accusations" were 100% true, he stood accused of no crime, only something minorly inappropriate. Of course, there was no proof one way or the other. It's ridiculous that such things ever came up in a job interview, especially in a public forum.

In Thomas's own words, it was "a lynching for uppity blacks." And it is pretty clear he was correct. Don't forget, racist democrat Joe Biden led the witch hunt against this man.

He's already shown he's against vaccine mandates. He's a patriot through and through, and if you are interested in the man, you would do well to research him rather than just listening to the propaganda spit out by the people that are trying to smear him. It would be an apt thing to do, especially since he sits on a court (the highest one, in fact), and in court, they are sure to hear BOTH sides of the story. It's clear from your words you never even looked into him.

I don't think you truly understand the principles that the Republic was set up upon, either.

Thank you tanka. I should have known you would butt in here. No I am not interested in him or any other politician because I believe they are all compromised. What was a man of his postion doing telling dirty jokes anyway?

 

[tankasnowgod]

Thank you tanka. I should have known you would butt in here.

Yeah, I do tend to butt in when people make baseless statements. Especially when smearing someone they obviously know nothing about.

No I am not interested in him or any other politician because I believe they are all compromised.

Obviously, a lie. If you weren't interested in him, you wouldn't have brought him up by name. Justice Alito wrote the opinion for the majority, so why wouldn't you bring him up? You also overlooked Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsch and Brett Kavanaugh as well only to bring up someone you aren't interested in. Suuuuuuure.

It should also be noted that Supreme Court Justice's aren't politicians. They don't "run" for that office, nor are they elected.

What was a man of his postion doing telling dirty jokes anyway?

I didn't say he ever did. It's a rumor, nothing else. My point is that is all he even stands accused of.

 

[Peatness]

Yeah, I do tend to butt in when people make baseless statements. Especially when smearing someone they obviously know nothing about.

Obviously, a lie. If you weren't interested in him, you wouldn't have brought him up by name. Justice Alito wrote the opinion for the majority, so why wouldn't you bring him up? You also overlooked Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsch and Brett Kavanaugh as well only to bring up someone you aren't interested in. Suuuuuuure.

It should also be noted that Supreme Court Justice's aren't politicians. They don't "run" for that office, nor are they elected.

I didn't say he ever did. It's a rumor, nothing else. My point is that is all he even stands accused of.

The way Hill was treated during the time of the accusation was appalling. It wasn’t right.

I singled out Thomas because someone on this thread mentioned him. I stand be what I said

 

[tankasnowgod]

The way Hill was treated during the time of the accusation was appalling. It wasn’t right.

Ridiculous. Hill got movie star treatment for accusing Thomas of NOTHING. From your own article-

Hill accused Thomas of unwanted sexual misconduct when she worked for him in the 1980s. She made several allegations against Thomas including being pressured to go out with him socially, inappropriate remarks at work and discussing “pornographic materials.”

So what? Again, that's asking her out to dinner, and telling some dirty jokes, IF THAT EVEN HAPPENED. And there is no proof that any of it even happened.

And the entire article focuses on Joe Biden, the same man that praised Ku Klux Klan member at his funeral-


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqO_LiKjJjk&t=98s


Biden is clearly a disgusting character.

I singled out Thomas because someone on this thread mentioned him. I stand be what I said

What did you say about him, other than implying that Anita Hill accused him of something? I guess that's true, but Thomas NEVER did anything to her, full stop. And remember, Ted Kennedy was also on the panel that led a witch hunt against Thomas, and Kennedy is 100% responsible for the death of Mary Jo Kopechne. In fact, it was the ridiculous sham hearings of Thomas that basically turned Andrew Breitbart from a liberal into a conservative-


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70OH6cKVNJI


I really think you should base your opinion of Thomas on facts, and not just parrot the opinions of Joe Biden and the Mass Satanic Media. These are the same people and entities promoting things like vaccines for kids and vaccine mandates, something which you seem to be against. So why do you just blindly accept what they say about Thomas?

 

[Peatness]

Fact? You insists he did nothing wrong? Why the certainty? I'm not parroting anything I simply linked an article. Stop being an a s s. You know I don't like doing argument gymnastics with you.