Plants Can Be Anesthetized, May Have Electronic Consciousness Like Humans

[Travis]

The cosmic rays tunnel through to the core via the north and south poles where there's no magnetic field to deflect them. It's not just cosmic rays, it's bierkland currents, solar wind, and flux transfer events. It's a growth in mass not volume.

Ray is a fan of growing earth:

Have you done the calculations to prove that the cosmic neutron flux can account for this change in volume?

 

[pimpnamedraypeat]

Have you done the calculations to prove that the cosmic neutron flux can account for this change in volume?

I'm more of a big picture guy. I wouldn't even know where to start. A truth doesn't have to be quantified to be true.

 

[haidut]

Of course.

It eats electric space spaghetti also known as bierkland currents via its mouth in the north pole

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It likes it's spaghetti flavored with a little sauce from the big meatball in the sky

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It uses that high carb energy to grow

"I have been continually amazed that the simplicity with which Earth expansion answers so much of the Earth's evolution has been so delayed in universal adoption." -- Klaus A. Vogel, engineer, 1983

"The continental drift may be explained by an expanding Earth only." -- Laszlo Egyed, geophysicist, 1960

"All plate-tectonic reconstructions, commence by closing the Atlantic. If instead of closing the Atlantic we begin by closing the Pacific on a globe of the present size, the reconstructed Pangea again fills a hemisphere, but an expanded Atlantic now occupies the hidden hemisphere, an absurdity which is only removed by Earth expansion." -- S. Warren Carey, geologist, 1996

"As a geologist, I insist that the Earth has expanded, and leave it as a cosmological problem of the whole universe." -- S. Warren Carey, geologist, 1996

"The many geophysical and geological paradoxes that have accumulated during the past two or three decades are apparently the consequences of forcing observational data into an inadequate tectonic model."-- Karsten M. Storetvedt, geophysicist, 1992

"Growth of the earth episodically throughout geological time is abundantly evident." -- C. Warren Hunt, geologist, 1992

"The balance of evidence seems to require an expanding Earth." -- Derek V. Ager, biogeographer, 1986

"The hypothesis of an expanding Earth is inescapable." -- Derek V. Ager, biogeographer, 1986​

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

but now that it's an adult it mostly uses it to rotate and to generate electromagnetic field and maintain a stable weather system and all that other stuff the earth does.

When the food runs out the earth stops rotating and the weather get's all messed up. Some people are left in darkness

"According to the legend, the ancient peoples [of Lake Titicaca] had been without light for many days." -- Clive L. N. Ruggles, archaeoastronomer, 2005

"It is said that in this province [Titicaca] the people of ancient times tell of being without light from the heavens for many days, and all of the local inhabitants were astonished, confused, and frightened to have total darkness for such a long time. Finally, the people of the Island of Titicaca saw the Sun come up one morning out of that crag with extraordinary radiance." -- Bernabé Cobo, historian, 1990
​

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

some in unending light

"Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day." -- Joshua 10:13​

"In the lifetime of Yao the sun did not set for ten full days and the entire land was flooded." -- Johannes Hübner, evangelist, 1729

"... the day was retarded in contrariety to nature, and the sun delayed." -- Plutarch, historian, 1st century

"And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed..." -- Joshua 10:13
​

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sometimes the earth get's indigestion and spins backwards. No one's happy if mother earth isn't happy.

"Could the [American] Indians on this continent know the connection between the sun appearing over the horizon, Eastern horizon, dropping down, again appearing, dropping down, and all the continent, this continent, bursting in flame? How could they know the connection? So they could not invent the stories. Something must have happened." -- Immanuel Velikovsky, polymath, 1966

"The signs of the Chinese zodiac have the strange peculiarity of proceeding in a retrograde direction, that is, against the course of the sun." -- Hans S. Bellamy, author, 1936

"The Chinese say that it is only since a new order of things has come about that the stars move from east to west." -- Hans S. Bellamy, author, 1936

"The inhabitants of this country [Egypt] say that they have it from their ancestors that the sun now sets where it formerly rose." -- Gaius J. Solinus, grammarian, 3rd century

"The reversal which takes place from time to time of the motion of the universe. ... Of all changes of the heavenly motions, we may consider this to be the greatest and most complete. " -- Plato, philosopher, The Statesman, 360 B.C.

"There is a time when God himself guides and helps to roll the world in its course; and there is a time, on the completion of a certain cycle, when he lets go, and the world being a living creature, and having originally received intelligence from its author and creator turns about and by an inherent necessity revolves in the opposite direction." -- Plato, philosopher, The Statesman, 360 B.C.

"There did really happen, and will again happen, like many other events of which ancient tradition has preserved the record, the portent which is traditionally said to have occurred in the quarrel of Atreus and Thyestes. ... how the sun and the stars once rose in the west, and set in the east, and that the god reversed their motion, and gave them that which they now have as a testimony to the right of Atreus. " -- Plato, philosopher, The Statesman, 360 B.C.​

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sometimes the earth lays on it's side, freezing what was once the tropical equator and covering it with ice a mile high.

"And immediately there is the problem of the climate. There were ancient climates that were very different from what they are today. If those corals grew where they were found, certainly the Earth was not travelling with the same elements of rotation and revolution which means not in the same orbit, not with the axis directed in the same position as it is today. If you don't believe it, try to cultivate corals on the North Pole." -- Immanuel Velikovsky, cosmologist, 1966​

"Dear Professor Hapgood, Your request for evaluation of certain unusual features of the Piri Reis World Map of 1513 by this organization has been reviewed. The claim that the lower part of the map portrays the Princess Martha Coast of Queen Maud Land Antarctica, and the Palmer Peninsula, is reasonable. We find this is the most logical and in all probability the correct interpretation of the map. The geographical detail shown in the lower part of the map agrees very remarkably with the results of the seismic profile made across the top of the ice-cap by the Swedish-British Antarctic Expedition of 1949. This indicates the coastline had been mapped before it was covered by the ice-cap. The ice-cap in this region is now about a mile thick. We have no idea how the data on this map can be reconciled with the supposed date of geographical knowledge in 1513." -- Harold Z. Ohlmeyer, Lieutenant Colonel USAF, 1966
​

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When the meatball sauce runs out the earth cools and we all freeze to death (coming soon..)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It shits out oil of course.

I think you will really like this new article - magnetic reconnection seems to drive all major illumination phenomena in the Universe, and connect Earth's magnetic activity to the magnetic activity of stars/galaxies half the Universe away.
Stellar magnetism: What’s behind the most brilliant lights in the sky?
If that is the case then the crap being poured from Discovery/Universe channels (as well as most universe courses on physics/cosmology) is an insult to science. I wonder if there is a single career physicist or professors who isn't a professional fraud.

 

[pimpnamedraypeat]

I think you will really like this new article - magnetic reconnection seems to drive all major illumination phenomena in the Universe, and connect Earth's magnetic activity to the magnetic activity of stars/galaxies half the Universe away.
Stellar magnetism: What’s behind the most brilliant lights in the sky?
If that is the case then the crap being poured from Discovery/Universe channels (as well as most universe courses on physics/cosmology) is an insult to science. I wonder if there is a single career physicist or professors who isn't a professional fraud.

The honest ones are all retired or fired.

That's an interesting article but according to the electric universe theory, magnetic reconnection doesn't actually exist. It's a convenient way to visualize what's happening but the physical process is electrical.

From the article:

Space physicists at University of Wisconsin–Madison have just released unprecedented detail on a bizarre phenomenon that powers the northern lights, solar flares and coronal mass ejections (the biggest explosions in our solar system).

Northern lights, solar flares, and CMEs are all charged plasma. It's either disinformation or misinformation.

This is a really interesting video that explains the bs behind "magnetic reconnection"



If you replace the work magentic reconnection with electric plasma that article becomes a lot more accurate.

 

[Travis]

The Earth's radius is generally given as 6371 kilometers, but this would have been smaller 2.5 million years ago. According to Creer, it would have been 3504 kilometers:

'Creer estimated the earth's radius as 0.55R in the Early Precambrian, 0.94–0.96R at the beginning of the Palaeozoic, and 0 96–0.97R at the beginning of the Mesozom.' ―Carey​

This yields a surface area of 1.54(10)⁸‧km², or 1.54(10)¹⁴‧m².

Both protons and neutrons have mass, and they constantly bombard the Earth. The neutron flux has been measured at 47‧m⁻²‧s⁻¹ and the proton flux at 1030‧m⁻²‧s⁻¹‧Sr⁻¹. From these values, it's possible to estimate the increase in mass of the primordial Earth.

Since protons and neutrons both weigh one atomic mass unit (amu), it is possible for this purpose to simply combine these fluxes. But first, one needs to convert the units: The proton flux is in per steradian; since the Earth is a sphere and is bombarded on all sides one only needs to multiply by 4π to obtain units equivalent to the neutron flux. This yields 4120π‧m⁻²‧s⁻¹, or 12943‧m⁻²‧s⁻¹. The neutron flux is now beginning to seem insignificant, but its easy enough to add anyway and yields a more rounded number of 12990‧m⁻²‧s⁻¹ (× atomic mass units).

Multiplying by the primitive Earth surface area:

1.54(10)¹⁴‧m² × 12990‧m⁻²‧s⁻¹ = ?

1.54(10)¹⁴‧m² × 12990‧m⁻²‧s⁻¹ = 1.19(10)¹⁰‧s⁻¹​

Gives the amount of total particles weighing one atomic mass unit that strikes a ball of radius 3504‧km in space per second.

One million years is 31.5(10)¹² seconds:

1.19(10)¹⁰‧s⁻¹ × 31.5(10)¹²‧s = ?

1.19(10)¹⁰‧s⁻¹ × 31.5(10)¹²‧s = 37.5(10)²⁴​

Of course this is in the implicit atomic mass units (a.k.a. Daltons), and one of these is equal to 1.66(10)⁻²⁷‧kg.

37.5(10)²⁴‧Da × 1.66(10)⁻²⁷‧kg‧Da⁻¹ = ?

37.5(10)²⁴‧Da × 1.66(10)⁻²⁷‧kg‧Da⁻¹ = 62.2(10)⁻³‧kg​

This is equivalent to 62.2 grams of mass being added per one million years. Assuming this added volume doesn't significantly change the radius (and thus catching slightly more particles), then the total mass added to the primordial Earth over a span of 250 million years is roughly 15.5 kilograms. Based on these preliminary calculations, it would appear that the contribution of added mass from meteorites exceeds that contributed by cosmic rays—even in the absence of magnetic field shielding effects.

Bonardi, Antonio. "Direct measurement of the atmospheric neutron flux in the energy range 10–500 MeV." Astroparticle Physics (2010)
Wu, K. K. M. "Variation of Proton Flux with Atmospheric Depth Between 10 and 50 g/cm² at l= 47° S. Geomagnetic." Australian Journal of Physics (1965)​

 

[Koveras]

Wherever there is fission, there is an inescapable increase in volume; the lighter elements simply take up more space per unit mass—which is conserved. Accepting the idea that fission occurs in the Earth's core is sufficient in itself to explain how it's expanding, and I'd even go so far as to say that it's a far more logical explanation than those either invoking 'the ether' and those involving spontaneous changes in gravitational constant.

So the earth will eventually be a gas giant?

 

[Travis]

So the earth will eventually be a gas giant?

I am reading some articles on it right now. I think the idea is that there is molten iron in the centre which is in flux, moving circuitously by the Earth's rotation but also periodically cycling in convection currents. Since iron is one of the few paramagnetic atoms, this motion creates a magnetic field—which is detectable in the surface.

But also within the core is the denser uranium roughly three times that of iron, and as such would be expected to concentrate towards the very centre. Once this reaches a 'critical mass,' nuclear fission is initiated. But since this is not contained in rods and held stationary, and overreacting core is allowed to self‐dissipate when creating too much pressure—after which it can recondense towards the centre. In this manner, the cyclic nature of the self‐cooling self‐controlled nuclear reaction creates the long observed fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field.

Since the core is liquid, we don't have to worry about the Earth exploding. As soon as the fission 'goes too critical,' it blows itself apart and stops.

The evidence for this is chemical forensic/archeological data for a natural uranium reactor in Oklo, South Africa, and the eightfold higher ³He/⁴He ratio found emitting from oceanic vents. I think you could almost say that the helium ratio 'proves' the fission—and the heat! don't forget about the heat (and the pressure which can be seen relieved in volcanic eruptions).

I think nuclear fission is the only form of energy production feasible in the Earth core. Historically, and humorously, some chemists/physicists/geologists had tried to explain this through the 'latent heat of crystallization.'

 

[Travis]

Uranium has a density of 19.1‧g/cm³, so one kilogram would occupy the space of 52.36 cubic centimeters (ρ = m/V). In an article on this topic Doctor J. Marvin Herndon provides the fission products of uranium with their relative prevalence:

Herndon, J. Marvin. "Nuclear georeactor generation of the earth's geomagnetic field." Current Science (2007)

Taking the data for ²³⁸uranium (left), it can be shown that its first generation fission products would occupy a space of 224.3‧cm³:

土...m(g)..ρ(g/cm³)..V(cm³)
Zr = 76 ÷ 6.490 = 11.71
Xe = 70 ÷ 3.060 = 22.88
Mo = 66 ÷ 10.20 = 6.47
Y = 66 ÷ 4.470 = 14.77
Nb = 64 ÷ 8.400 = 7.62
Ba = 61 ÷ 3.500 = 17.43
Cs = 59 ÷ 1.900 = 31.05
I = 53 ÷ 4.940 = 10.73
La = 49 ÷ 6.170 = 7.94
Sr = 48 ÷ 2.600 = 18.46
Tc = 48 ÷ 11.50 = 4.17
Ce = 45 ÷ 6.670 = 6.75
Te = 40 ÷ 6.240 = 6.41
Pr = 35 ÷ 6.770 = 5.17
Ru = 35 ÷ 12.20 = 2.87
Rb = 34 ÷ 1.530 = 22.22
Nd = 30 ÷ 7.000 = 4.29
Rh = 24 ÷ 12.40 = 1.94
Kr = 24 ÷ 2.600 = 9.23
Sb = 22 ÷ 6.620 = 3.32
Br = 12 ÷ 3.120 = 3.85
Pd = 10 ÷ 12.00 = .834
In = 5 ÷ 7.310 = .684
Sn = 5 ÷ 7.300 = .685
Cd = 4 ÷ 8.650 = .462
Pm = 4 ÷ 7.260 = .551
Sm = 4 ÷ 7.540 = .531
Se = 3 ÷ 4.790 = .626
Eu = 1 ÷ 5.260 = .190
Ag = 1 ÷ 10.50 = .095
Ge = 1 ÷ 5.320 = .188
Gd = 1 ÷ 7.890 = .127
Σ = 1000‧g..........224.3‧cm³​

This translates to a 4.28× increase in volume upon fission.

'Creer estimated the earth's radius as 55% in the Early Precambrian, 94–96% at the beginning of the Palaeozoic, and 96–97% at the beginning of the Mesozom.' ―Carey​

The Creer estimation of for the pre‐Cambrian Earth radius is 3504‧km. The increase in volume is easily calculated from the initial pre‐Cambrian radius:

ΔV = V₂ − V₀
ΔV = ⁴⁄₃π(r₂)³ − ⁴⁄₃π(r₀)³
ΔV = ⁴⁄₃π‧(6371‧km)³ − ⁴⁄₃π(3504‧km)³
ΔV = ⁴⁄₃π‧{(6371)³ − (3504)³}‧km³
ΔV = 9.03(10)¹¹‧km³​

It would take the fissioning of 2.11(10)¹¹‧km³ of uranium‐238 to equal the estimated volume increase. This volume would correspond to a radius of.. .

V = ⁴⁄₃π(r₂)³
³√(2.11(10)¹¹‧km³) = ⁴⁄₃π(r)
³√(.211(10)¹²‧km³) = ⁴⁄₃π(r)
.595(10)⁴‧km = ⁴⁄₃π(r)
.595(10)⁴‧km = ⁴⁄₃π(r)
.142(10)⁴‧km = r
1420‧km = r​

So this scheme would take an initial core of uranium having a radius of 1420‧km to create the volume expansion estimated by Creer, which he had estimated having a total radius of 3504‧km. This is quite large, representing ~40% of the pre‐Cambrian Earth radius, ~22% of the present radius, and is ~82% the size of the moon. This would also yield an elemental distribution more top‐heavy in Zr, Xe, Mo, Y, Nb, I, and La than what is actually found on Earth. There must to be a further fissioning of these first generation ²³⁸U fission products for this scheme to work, which would shift the final elemental distribution towards that observed and lower the amount of total uranium required; further fissioning would yield a higher uranium expansion ratio than calculated for the first generation, which is ~4.28.

 

[Waynish]

Have plant response been measured for most recreational drugs too? Would be interesting to see if plant and human consciousness have the same responses... Which is the same as saying if plants and humans have the same or similar responses to substances

 

[pimpnamedraypeat]

I think nuclear fission is the only form of energy production feasible in the Earth core. Historically, and humorously, some chemists/physicists/geologists had tried to explain this through the 'latent heat of crystallization.'

The earth isn't producing energy it's getting it from outside

 

[LUH 3417]

The earth isn't producing energy it's getting it from outside

How do exploding super novas fit into your view?

 

[Travis]

The earth isn't producing energy it's getting it from outside

Is the moon getting the same amount of energy?

 

[pimpnamedraypeat]

How do exploding super novas fit into your view?

Fortunately for you I've just had my cup of coffee.

Supernovas are exploding electric capacitors that are powered by the same cosmic power source that powers the sun and the earth. Did you know exploding supernovas far out in space are linked to mega earthquakes here on earth? In fact we experience the earthquake before the light from the supernova reaches us. Though seperated by billions of miles, the earthquakes and super novas happen simultaneously. Now how can that be? Doesn't that violate several laws of physics?

The same electric surge that causes supernovas also causes earthquakes here on earth. Like hitting the fuse at home. The electric appliances light up at once because they're all connected to the same power source.

We had an electric surge about 10,000 years ago, quite recently in geological time, that caused the dwarf star saturn to go supernova.

Actual timelapse of star exploding

"Saturn exploded and caused the Earth to go through the greatest of its historical catastrophes, and this was completely sufficient to make of Saturn the supreme deity....after the Deluge, Saturn dismembered, almost ceased to exist as a planetary body and when at length it was reconstituted it was fettered by rings..." -- Immanuel Velikovsky, polymath, In the Beginning: Saturn's Golden Age, 1966​

"At a date that I would be hard put to identify even with approximation, but possibly about less than ten thousand years ago Saturn was disturbed by Jupiter and exploded, actually became a nova. The solar system and reaches beyond it were illuminated by the exploded star, and in a matter of a week the earth was enveloped in waters of Saturnian origin." -- Immanuel Velikovsky, polymath, Saturn, 1966​

The waters from saturn became the flood that Noah of the ark and those Aztecs from lake Tititaca narrowly escaped.

The supernova killed the giants and the majority of big animal life.

"The second sun perished when the sky fell upon the earth; the collapse killed all the people and every living thing; and they say that giants lived in those days, and that to them belong the bones that our Spaniards have found while digging mines and tombs. From their measure and proportion it seems that those men were twenty hands tall—a very great stature, but quite certain." -- Francisco L. De Gómara, historian, 1552​

Even darwin says so

"It is impossible to reflect on the changed state of the American continent without the deepest astonishment. Formerly, it must have swarmed with great monsters; now we find mere pigmies, compared with the antecedent allied races.... The greater number, if not all, of these extinct quadrapeds lived at a period and were the contemporaries of the existing sea-shells. Since they lived, no very great change in the form of the land can have taken place. What, then, has exterminated so many species and whole genera? The mind at first is irresistibly hurried into the belief of some great catastrophe; but thus to destroy animals, both large and small, in Southern Patagonia, in Brazil, on the Cordillera of Peru, in North America, and up to the Bering Straights, we must shake the entire framework of the globe." -- Charles R. Darwin, naturalist, January 1834​

It caused great turmoil on earth. Wiped out all but the chosen few. The influx of energy and matter cause the earth to grow. It also caused punctuated equilibrium. Made lots of new animals on earth.

The effects of nearby supernovae on the biosphere have been the object of intensive study be geologists in recent years, in the attempt to account for abrupt changes in the history of life on this planet. Cf. D. Russel and W. Tucker, “Supernovae and the Extinction of the Dinosaurs,” Nature 229 (Feb. 19, 1971), pp. 553-554. ​

Thus over the past two or three decades many geologists and paleontologists have found themselves increasingly drawn to the view that the observed abrupt changes in the biosphere, such as that which marked the end of the Mesozoic and is thought to have brought with it the extinction of the dinosaurs, among other animal groups, could best be explained by the exposure of the then living organisms to massive doses of radiation coming from a nearby supernova. The radiation would annihilate many species, especially those whose representatives, whether because of their large size or for other reasons, were unable to shield themselves from the powerful rays; at the same time new organisms would be created through mutations or “macro-evolution.” See Velikovsky’s comments in “The Pitfalls of Radiocarbon Dating,” Pensée IV (1973), p. 13: ​

“. . .in the catastrophe of the Deluge, which I ascribe to Saturn exploding as a nova, the cosmic rays must have been very abundant to cause massive mutations among all species of life . . .” Animals would suffer much more severely than plants—on plants the principle effect would be mutagenic. See K. D. Terry and W. H. Tucker, “Biologic Effects of Supernovae,” Science 159 (1968), pp. 421-423.​

 

[pimpnamedraypeat]

Is the moon getting the same amount of energy?

No, silly. The moon isn't alive.

 

[Xisca]

@Xisca this is really fascinating. I’ve been thinking about your posts on ACV and bitter greens and incorporating both of those seems helpful to my digestion.

I had to suppress ACV and go on with greens only, but I have a problem with acetic acids etc, and I have stopped even fruits except that I try to keep papaya.

Also, mitochondria have their own DNA that is seperate from our own. Because at one point, they were external to human beings. We are their host.

I heard they were bacterias before....

Have plant response been measured for most recreational drugs too? Would be interesting to see if plant and human consciousness have the same responses... Which is the same as saying if plants and humans have the same or similar responses to substances

What a good idea!
Anyway, gardeners who make some teas, from humous or plants, and dilute for spraying as almost homeopathy, might be "talking" to plants, or help them communicate better, and this is also through external beings... same as our DNA and mitochondria.

lol this post is almost no more about plants!

 

[Xisca]

...and if cloves anesthetize our mouth, what does it do in its environment?

and some plants are stopping the growth of others, and the avocado sends a substance to its fruits, so they cannot mature on the tree. I keep them for months.

 

[Travis]

Fortunately for you I've just had my cup of coffee.

Supernovas are exploding electric capacitors that are powered by the same cosmic power source that powers the sun and the earth. Did you know exploding supernovas far out in space are linked to mega earthquakes here on earth? In fact we experience the earthquake before the light from the supernova reaches us. Though seperated by billions of miles, the earthquakes and super novas happen simultaneously. Now how can that be? Doesn't that violate several laws of physics?

The same electric surge that causes supernovas also causes earthquakes here on earth. Like hitting the fuse at home. The electric appliances light up at once because they're all connected to the same power source.

We had an electric surge about 10,000 years ago, quite recently in geological time, that caused the dwarf star saturn to go supernova.

Actual timelapse of star exploding

"Saturn exploded and caused the Earth to go through the greatest of its historical catastrophes, and this was completely sufficient to make of Saturn the supreme deity....after the Deluge, Saturn dismembered, almost ceased to exist as a planetary body and when at length it was reconstituted it was fettered by rings..." -- Immanuel Velikovsky, polymath, In the Beginning: Saturn's Golden Age, 1966​

"At a date that I would be hard put to identify even with approximation, but possibly about less than ten thousand years ago Saturn was disturbed by Jupiter and exploded, actually became a nova. The solar system and reaches beyond it were illuminated by the exploded star, and in a matter of a week the earth was enveloped in waters of Saturnian origin." -- Immanuel Velikovsky, polymath, Saturn, 1966​

The waters from saturn became the flood that Noah of the ark and those Aztecs from lake Tititaca narrowly escaped.

The supernova killed the giants and the majority of big animal life.

"The second sun perished when the sky fell upon the earth; the collapse killed all the people and every living thing; and they say that giants lived in those days, and that to them belong the bones that our Spaniards have found while digging mines and tombs. From their measure and proportion it seems that those men were twenty hands tall—a very great stature, but quite certain." -- Francisco L. De Gómara, historian, 1552​

Even darwin says so

"It is impossible to reflect on the changed state of the American continent without the deepest astonishment. Formerly, it must have swarmed with great monsters; now we find mere pigmies, compared with the antecedent allied races.... The greater number, if not all, of these extinct quadrapeds lived at a period and were the contemporaries of the existing sea-shells. Since they lived, no very great change in the form of the land can have taken place. What, then, has exterminated so many species and whole genera? The mind at first is irresistibly hurried into the belief of some great catastrophe; but thus to destroy animals, both large and small, in Southern Patagonia, in Brazil, on the Cordillera of Peru, in North America, and up to the Bering Straights, we must shake the entire framework of the globe." -- Charles R. Darwin, naturalist, January 1834​

It caused great turmoil on earth. Wiped out all but the chosen few. The influx of energy and matter cause the earth to grow. It also caused punctuated equilibrium. Made lots of new animals on earth.

The effects of nearby supernovae on the biosphere have been the object of intensive study be geologists in recent years, in the attempt to account for abrupt changes in the history of life on this planet. Cf. D. Russel and W. Tucker, “Supernovae and the Extinction of the Dinosaurs,” Nature 229 (Feb. 19, 1971), pp. 553-554. ​

Thus over the past two or three decades many geologists and paleontologists have found themselves increasingly drawn to the view that the observed abrupt changes in the biosphere, such as that which marked the end of the Mesozoic and is thought to have brought with it the extinction of the dinosaurs, among other animal groups, could best be explained by the exposure of the then living organisms to massive doses of radiation coming from a nearby supernova. The radiation would annihilate many species, especially those whose representatives, whether because of their large size or for other reasons, were unable to shield themselves from the powerful rays; at the same time new organisms would be created through mutations or “macro-evolution.” See Velikovsky’s comments in “The Pitfalls of Radiocarbon Dating,” Pensée IV (1973), p. 13: ​

“. . .in the catastrophe of the Deluge, which I ascribe to Saturn exploding as a nova, the cosmic rays must have been very abundant to cause massive mutations among all species of life . . .” Animals would suffer much more severely than plants—on plants the principle effect would be mutagenic. See K. D. Terry and W. H. Tucker, “Biologic Effects of Supernovae,” Science 159 (1968), pp. 421-423.​

Besides the α-particles, protons, and neutrons released from supernova events, the electromagnetic radiation (γ-rays) could also influence Earth; I can see how this could potentially have been responsible for the cataclysmic events you had alluded to. One might wonder, 'How can electromagnetic radiation influence the Earth?'—my logic is simple: our planet has a magnetic field which permeates the mantle; the ground is transparent to the magnetic field created in the Earth core by molten iron/nickel moving via rotational Coriolis effects and heat convection currents. You can prove this with a compass, as the needle will align itself along these lines of magnetic force every time. Conversely, the Earth's magnetic field is influence by the compass needle—however slightly. Since the Earth's magnetic field is fairly well understood by classic Maxwell–Faraday electrodynamics, you might be inclined to assume that they would fully conform to its Laws. If so: the Earth's inner magnetic field—or the distribution of its inner molten iron—would be expected to be influenced by electromagnetic fields of similar magnitude, such as those produced by supernova events.

'We show that the relativistic two-stream instability can naturally generate strong magnetic fields with 10⁻⁵ – 10⁻¹ of the equipartition energy density, in the collisionless shocks of Gamma-Ray-Burst (GRB) sources.' ―Medvedev​

Assuming the Earth's inner heat is fundamentally produced by the fission of uranium, a shift in the distribution of this element could effect the fission rate. Because uranium is one of the densest elements you'd expect to occupy the very inner core. Since this would be more‐or‐less surrounded by ferromagnetic elements (Fe, Ni, Co) in a liquid state which can respond to EM waves, any γ-ray burst of sufficient magnitude could potentially effect a redistribution of fissile uranium through displacement even though uranium is nonmagnetic; this could tend towards and increase in fission, heat, pressure, earthquakes and eruptions—in that order.

Medvedev, Mikhail V. "Generation of magnetic fields in the relativistic shock of gamma-ray burst sources." The Astrophysical Journal (1999)​