YOU GLOBE EARTHERS think you KNOW IT ALL Huh - WAKE UP

[Perry Staltic]

Someday I will try to get to the north pole, but I will take measures to not be discovered. I imagine it is similar to Frodo trying to get to Mt. Doom. There are videos of people online being escorted away, look into it. I would go by boat because they will see the plane more easily.

By Santa's security elves

 

[Jing]

this is a great idea!

they could do it with only 2 people, one person in Australia or NZ or Southern South America, and one person at the northern hemisphere at the equivalent latitude.
Travel directly east/west between two cities and measure the distance. I imagine a couple hundred miles would be lots of resolution to see that the globe earth model is wrong and flat earth map is right.

BOOM, globe earth busted! Such a simple experiment.

How exactly would this prove anything?

 

[ddjd]

Thought of you James

View: https://twitter.com/TNTJohn1717/status/1569619239517970433?t=tIdUZJsPRL7cmGJFrS8eBA&s=19

 

[ddjd]

@JamesGatz check this out



View: https://twitter.com/ronin19217435/status/1564677147666644992?t=yaYp8ksS62-l7e30pyjk4g&s=19



View: https://twitter.com/TNTJohn1717/status/1569597944503959557?t=ct62LKqUffzl_BVZ4ojSeg&s=19

 

[MCurtone]

to a swimming pool, to

Water curves inside the level. Have you ever looked at one? Water indeed finds its level but it curves when it's a tiny volume or when a force is a applied to it. Magnetism easily lifts metallic fluids.

A level points to the center of gravity, thus over distance a curve will be produced. The same must be true for buildings. I suppose then if you built some long structure by forcing a right angle instead of leveling, then you would reveal the curvature of the earth beneath the structure. There's no such thing as perfect architecture — this is axiomatic. Yet buildings are built.

A whole lot said without saying much at all. All a bunch of empirical evidence and pure theory being said by you, with no proof at all. This is typical of bookworms, academics and people who pride themselves in physics.

Still can't provide the most basic formula which should exist for the rate at which water magically begins to bend over X surface area or volume. Because water doesn't bend and there is no measurable curve over any body of water on this earth. A lot of cognitive dissonance.

 

[JamesGatz]

another experiment people can do for themselves to demonstrate geosynchronous satellites (or something on the dome?) exists. if it is on the dome, what is it and how did it get there?

View attachment 42124

Oh wow Sattelites are real Robert?

Then explain how this is possible:

It is immune to:

Gravity

4000 degrees Farenheit without melting (multiple thousands of degrees past its melting point)

-186 degrees Farenheit without Freezing

Runs 17,000 Miles per hour without being ripped apart which is 17 times faster than Earths orbit

Somehow stays in the same regions of Earth while traveling x17 faster than it's Orbit

Its immune to cameras clearly - because NASA cant catch them on their photos or livestreams

Oh yea - Unlimited supply of Gas/Electricity they're running on for 15+ Years - How is this possible? They never run out of Energy

This is a picture of a Disk with a square pointed up - it could easily be receiving radio signals, signals from cell towers, or connected to an alternative structure on the ground that is connected to the internet through fiber optics

No one would be the wiser

 

[miquelangeles]

It is immune to:

Gravity

But.. but I thought gravity didn't exist..

 

[miquelangeles]

Gravity is a MASON FAIRYTALE.

 

[Robert5493]

Oh wow Sattelites are real Robert?

Then explain how this is possible:

It is immune to:

Gravity

4000 degrees Farenheit without melting (multiple thousands of degrees past its melting point)

-186 degrees Farenheit without Freezing

Runs 17,000 Miles per hour without being ripped apart which is 17 times faster than Earths orbit

Somehow stays in the same regions of Earth while traveling x17 faster than it's Orbit

Its immune to cameras clearly - because NASA cant catch them on their photos or livestreams

Oh yea - Unlimited supply of Gas/Electricity they're running on for 15+ Years - How is this possible? They never run out of Energy

This is a picture of a Disk with a square pointed up - it could easily be receiving radio signals, signals from cell towers, or connected to an alternative structure on the ground that is connected to the internet through fiber optics

No one would be the wiser

no they are not immune to gravity, they rely on gravity as already explained numerous times.

Temperature is not energy. 4000F at what enthalpy? where is the heat flow? Never used a thermos?

17000 miles per hour relative to what? what would be nearby traveling at a different speed and tearing it apart?

Thats the point, it has to travel faster to stay in the same spot over the earth because it travels a bigger circle.
Do you know how the wheel works? Same math.

can you see a car 10,000 miles away? you can see low orbit satellites by eye, you could see streams of them when launched. If they were not satellites what were they?

what fuel does it need if it is coasting in a vacuum and not accelerating? What fuel do you use when "falling"?
Solar panels provide the power needed for the transponder, about 150 watts per.


you've obviously never set up a satellite dish, ask anyone who has. millions of people have done it.
They need to be pointed with precision to a point on "the dome" and that point angle depends on your latitude. angle off by a degree and you lose signal,
those are empirical facts you can test yourself so clearly not connected underground or capturing radiowaves.

you could easily do experiments yourself to look into this stuff, but in your specific case it seems you want to feel special and gain followers.

simply provide a map of flat earth with a scale and lets test this theory.


If you won't even provide a map to scale, what are you hiding?
are you a Mason trying to make the forum look foolish so people ignore it?

 

[Karlx]

A whole lot said without saying much at all. All a bunch of empirical evidence and pure theory being said by you, with no proof at all. This is typical of bookworms, academics and people who pride themselves in physics.

Still can't provide the most basic formula which should exist for the rate at which water magically begins to bend over X surface area or volume. Because water doesn't bend and there is no measurable curve over any body of water on this earth. A lot of cognitive dissonance.

No one needs to produce a formula to help you visualize what is already apparent. I already demonstrated how you can use a level to create an ultimately curved object. Water also bends with the utmost willingness and ease so long as force is continuously applied to it. The air bubble in a level is clearly round, and you're using this instrument to debunk that water could ever take on a round shape at the macro scale. The ocean is also a constantly churning mess.. No body of water is level and neither is a simple glass of water — it tries to be so but can never quite accomplish it. 'WATER FINDS ITS OWN LEVEL!' No it doesn't. It tries to find an even arc with the center of gravity. It comes close this arc if the water is still enough, but surface tension around the rim produces another curve, and there are always small disturbances otherwise. 'Water finds its own level' is just a thing that people say. It's a rule of thumb for accomplishing small tasks like landscaping or something. It's not an articulate law of physics. You can't use this flat-earth slogan to deboonk 'globalism.' You're not a critical thinker, you're a mindless votary of schizophrenic priests like Eric Dubay.

You're conflating 'level' with 'right angle.' Levels do not really produce right angles, they ultimately produce curvature. They merely produce adequately level lines at small, human scales. There are bridges whose support beams point to the center of the earth; they are not quite parallel to each other. In my post I also explained how you could force a straight line with an edge, and that structure would inevitably 'lift' off the ground if indeed the world is a globe. You'd want to make two horizontal beams. One uses a level, the other a right angle. Over distance they should clearly cease being parallel. The 'level' one will generally find the center of gravity and produce curvature.

 

[ddjd]

View: https://twitter.com/TheDoctorRegen/status/1569549211917582336?s=19

 

[JamesGatz]

no they are not immune to gravity, they rely on gravity as already explained numerous times.

Temperature is not energy. 4000F at what enthalpy? where is the heat flow? Never used a thermos?

17000 miles per hour relative to what? what would be nearby traveling at a different speed and tearing it apart?

Thats the point, it has to travel faster to stay in the same spot over the earth because it travels a bigger circle.
Do you know how the wheel works? Same math.

can you see a car 10,000 miles away? you can see low orbit satellites by eye, you could see streams of them when launched. If they were not satellites what were they?

what fuel does it need if it is coasting in a vacuum and not accelerating? What fuel do you use when "falling"?
Solar panels provide the power needed for the transponder, about 150 watts per.


you've obviously never set up a satellite dish, ask anyone who has. millions of people have done it.
They need to be pointed with precision to a point on "the dome" and that point angle depends on your latitude. angle off by a degree and you lose signal,
those are empirical facts you can test yourself so clearly not connected underground or capturing radiowaves.

you could easily do experiments yourself to look into this stuff, but in your specific case it seems you want to feel special and gain followers.

simply provide a map of flat earth with a scale and lets test this theory.


If you won't even provide a map to scale, what are you hiding?
are you a Mason trying to make the forum look foolish so people ignore it?

Gain followers? Man do you think is Instagram or what

Can we start with the first question ?
How is it immune to Gravity and 4000 degrees Farenheit?

You completely dodged the question with some LYRICAL WORDPLAY man - its a simple question

How do you know the sattelite dish is actually looking for a signal in the sky? For all we know the square on the dish is looking for signals on the ground

Am I a mason? I wish - if I was a mason I would be a famous YouTuber or have my own show like the other COINTEL agents

 

[Robert5493]

Gain followers? Man do you think is Instagram or what

Can we start with the first question ?
How is it immune to Gravity and 4000 degrees Farenheit?

You completely dodged the question with some LYRICAL WORDPLAY man - its a simple question

How do you know the sattelite dish is actually looking for a signal in the sky? For all we know the square on the dish is looking for signals on the ground

Am I a mason? I wish - if I was a mason I would be a famous YouTuber or have my own show like the other COINTEL agents

Show us the map Mason!!!

Stop hiding it from us!

 

[LeeLemonoil]

Can we start with the first question ?
How is it immune to Gravity and 4000 degrees Farenheit?

Do you not read the answers you so brazenly demanded?

They aren’t immune to gravity. A stable orbit depends on gravity. Nor are they exposed to that kind of heat.

But you’re exposed. As a mason.

 

[mangoes]

The cronge of it all

 

[JamesGatz]

Do you not read the answers you so brazenly demanded?

They aren’t immune to gravity. A stable orbit depends on gravity. Nor are they exposed to that kind of heat.

But you’re exposed. As a mason.

Lee you're lookin like some BEEF AND BROCCOLI

 

[JamesGatz]

The cronge of it all

What's cringe about asking logical questions mangoes? Now I have fruit coming to talk to me in my thread Oh Great

 

[Summer]

It’s funny how these so-called men of science have no qualms with the clear fakery of the moon landing and the wires and teleporting objects in the ISS footage. It’s all still so real to them. Next time the government tries to mandate vaccines, maybe they should do it through NASA instead of the CDC.

 

[mangoes]

-

 

[Robert5493]

It’s funny how these so-called men of science have no qualms with the clear fakery of the moon landing and the wires and teleporting objects in the ISS footage. It’s all still so real to them. Next time the government tries to mandate vaccines, maybe they should do it through NASA instead of the CDC.

It is funny how these so-called open minded people are unwilling to test their beliefs.

At a local nuclear plant, the Ministry of energy wanted a photo op at the controls of the reactor.
Problem was, no one is allowed within 20 feet of those controls without a list of credentials the length of your arm.
So, they took him to the simulator and "faked" the entire photo op.
It was clear to anyone that knew anything about the industry, that it was faked.

had someone pointed out "hey look, that is a fake!" and circulated it on the internet,
would it then be logical to assume that "nuclear reactors are fake"?

for the ISS, there are numerous ways of seeing that it really exists.
for one, if you want to see it passing overhead at with your own eyes here is a website that if you put in your location it will tell you when and where to look as it zips past overhead. I'm sure it won't convince you but it should at least make you question "what was that, and how do they know it would be there, and how is it going so fast, and why isn't it burning up at that speed? etc. etc.

International Space Station

See the International Space Station! As the third brightest object in the sky the space station is easy to see if you know when to look up.

spotthestation.nasa.gov