Nemo
Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2019
- Messages
- 2,163
In 2017, Danny asked Ray, "Do you have any suspicions about NASA's truth telling ability? Specifically in regards to the early moon landings or at least the footage that was shown to everyone?"
Ray answered: "Oleg Oleynik's stereoscopic analysis looks good. Erasing videos, and losing vast amounts of documents, and moon rocks, could make a person suspicious. They were probably inspired by the FBI's evidence lab..."
Today, Danny is tweeting Oleg Oleynik's analysis, which concluded Apollo 15 photos "were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective."
Find the full analysis here:
You can find Dave McGowan's debunking of the moon landings starting here:
Ray answered: "Oleg Oleynik's stereoscopic analysis looks good. Erasing videos, and losing vast amounts of documents, and moon rocks, could make a person suspicious. They were probably inspired by the FBI's evidence lab..."
Today, Danny is tweeting Oleg Oleynik's analysis, which concluded Apollo 15 photos "were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective."
Find the full analysis here:
You can find Dave McGowan's debunking of the moon landings starting here:
Wagging the Moondoggie: Part I
“It is commonly believed that man will fly directly from the earth to the moon, but to do this, we would require a vehicle of such gigantic proportions that it would prove an economic impossibility…
centerforaninformedamerica.com