Ray Peat Recommends This Analysis of Moon Landing Fakery

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
In 2017, Danny asked Ray, "Do you have any suspicions about NASA's truth telling ability? Specifically in regards to the early moon landings or at least the footage that was shown to everyone?"

Ray answered: "Oleg Oleynik's stereoscopic analysis looks good. Erasing videos, and losing vast amounts of documents, and moon rocks, could make a person suspicious. They were probably inspired by the FBI's evidence lab..."

Today, Danny is tweeting Oleg Oleynik's analysis, which concluded Apollo 15 photos "were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective."

Find the full analysis here:


You can find Dave McGowan's debunking of the moon landings starting here:

 

sugarisgreat

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Messages
261
Thanks for posting this.
Stanley Kubrick actually admitted filming the "Apollo" moon landings before he "died."
Apparently, Nixon approached him and he couldn't refuse.

unnamed-17.jpg
unnamed-13.jpg
EW6VA6_XQAIJ18I.jpeg
 

blob69

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Messages
362
Interesting, thanks for sharing! I actually always found it strange that humans supposedly did land on the moon, but then they stopped doing it for some reason and nothing advanced whatsoever despite technology getting infinitely better. What a fake world do we live in.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2018
Messages
893
Location
The Netherlands
Interesting, thanks for sharing! I actually always found it strange that humans supposedly did land on the moon, but then they stopped doing it for some reason and nothing advanced whatsoever despite technology getting infinitely better. What a fake world do we live in.

It's possible that fake moon landing footage was produced because they had not actually been to the moon. Alternatively, fake footage may have been produced because they had reason to hide the original from the public.
 

S-VV

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2018
Messages
599
Considering many astronauts exhibit some kind of PTSD and MKultra-like psychologic conditioning, I think they did go to the moon, they just cant say what they saw, hence the fake/edited photos.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2018
Messages
893
Location
The Netherlands
What do you think the reason to hide this from the public could be?

I don't have an unusually creative imagination, but some who are more so inclined have suggested that there would have been incentive to hide original footage if that footage revealed others had gotten there first.

Edit: And by others, they do not mean the Soviets.
 
Last edited:

Lollipop2

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,267
Considering many astronauts exhibit some kind of PTSD and MKultra-like psychologic conditioning, I think they did go to the moon, they just cant say what they saw, hence the fake/edited photos.
+1 This.
 

LA

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2020
Messages
671
Milton William "Bill" Cooper - lectured on this fake moon landing and many people who have studied his work feel that is *one* of the reasons he was assassinated. He worked as Navy intel when he was younger.

Bill Cooper #43727.PDF is on this thread:


scroll down to page 21 in the PDF, then start reading here:

"To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale
mock-up of the moon."
[etc]
 

GAF

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2014
Messages
789
Age
67
Location
Dallas Texas
1620185357540.png


1620185421176.png


2 youtube channels a lot more fun than the obviously fake moon landings. These two channels are actually doing work that is interesting and fun to look at.

Furthermore:
Does anyone really believe they can send HD pics and video from Mars? "The minimum distance from Earth to Mars is about 33.9 million miles (54.6 million kilometers)." (per google)

Furthermore:
Does anyone really believe that per wikipedia:

"Dozens of crewless spacecraft, including orbiters, landers, and rovers, have been sent to Mars by the Soviet Union, the United States, Europe, and India to study the planet's surface, climate, and geology.

As of 2021, Mars is host to eleven functioning spacecraft: eight in orbit – 2001 Mars Odyssey, Mars Express, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, MAVEN, Mars Orbiter Mission, ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter, Emirates Mars Mission and Tianwen-1 – and three on the surface – the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover, the InSight lander and the Perseverance rover. "
 

LA

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2020
Messages
671
View attachment 23273

View attachment 23274

2 youtube channels a lot more fun than the obviously fake moon landings. These two channels are actually doing work that is interesting and fun to look at.

Furthermore:
Does anyone really believe they can send HD pics and video from Mars? "The minimum distance from Earth to Mars is about 33.9 million miles (54.6 million kilometers)." (per google)

Furthermore:
Does anyone really believe that per wikipedia:
videos take too long to speed read (grin)

NO - most here know that wikipedia is biased. I made a comment on this forum along with someone else who also used to be an editor and who also used to send them money. We both stopped editing and donating.
 
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
799
sketch-1613703898442.png

Obadiah 1:1-8
[1] The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord GOD concerning Edom; We have heard a rumour from the LORD, and an ambassador is sent among the heathen, Arise ye, and let us rise up against her in battle.
[2] Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen: thou art greatly despised.
[3] The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground?
[4] Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith the LORD.
[5] If thieves came to thee, if robbers by night, (how art thou cut off!) would they not have stolen till they had enough? if the grapegatherers came to thee, would they not leave some grapes?
[6] How are the things of Esau searched out! how are his hidden things sought up!
[7] All the men of thy confederacy have brought thee even to the border: the men that were at peace with thee have deceived thee, and prevailed against thee; they that eat thy bread have laid a wound under thee: there is none understanding in him.
[8] Shall I not in that day, saith the LORD, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Alternatively, fake footage may have been produced because they had reason to hide the original from the public.
Supposedly, it was broadcast from the moon "live," on it's maiden voyage (before Periscope was even invented!). Even if NASA really were planning a legitimate voyage to the moon, there's so many things that could go wrong...... the shuttle could explode, run out of fuel, not make it off an alien planet, freeze up in extreme cold, melt in the extreme heat, and maybe just be out of broadcast range when they landed on the moon. With a $5 Billion budget to protect, why wouldn't you fake up some moon landing footage?
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Furthermore:
Does anyone really believe they can send HD pics and video from Mars? "The minimum distance from Earth to Mars is about 33.9 million miles (54.6 million kilometers)." (per google)

That would be an excellent question for any Broadcast Engineer. "How did NASA manage to broadcast live video from the Moon in the 1960s? It's over 200,000 miles away, right?"
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2018
Messages
893
Location
The Netherlands
Supposedly, it was broadcast from the moon "live," on it's maiden voyage (before Periscope was even invented!). Even if NASA really were planning a legitimate voyage to the moon, there's so many things that could go wrong...... the shuttle could explode, run out of fuel, not make it off an alien planet, freeze up in extreme cold, melt in the extreme heat, and maybe just be out of broadcast range when they landed on the moon. With a $5 Billion budget to protect, why wouldn't you fake up some moon landing footage?

Exactly, the project was deemed too big to fail. So they had Laurel & Hardy put on extra thicc onesies and monkey around in the sand.
 
Back
Top Bottom