Due to excessive bot signups along with nefarious actors we are limiting forum registration. Keep checking back for the register link to appear. Please do not send emails or have someone post to the forum asking for a signup link. Until the current climate changes we do not see a change of this policy. To join the forum you must have a compelling reason. Letting us know what skills/knowledge you will bring to the community along with the intent of your stay here will help in getting you approved.
A short video I felt like making. Often times I hear rather stubborn arguments about the blight of technologies that, I believe, can be of great help rather than a blight if used properly.
There are several threads on the forum about this issue, but up until now the reports from the government always said the link between EMF and cancer is not "clear". Well, now apparently it is and the report is by the same group at NIH that published the initial troubling findings back in...
A human study, and it found a dose-dependent effects, which again suggests that there is probably no safe "threshold" as it is fraudulently claimed (https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/nas-falsified-data-on-radiation-safety-to-justify-widespread-use.5692/) about ionizing radiation to this...
This is one of the very few official studies from the US government that directly acknowledges the carcinogenicity of cellphone radiation. The study only found increased incidence in male animals, but the findings in females were inconclusive which is not the same as a finding of safety...
Little by little, the truth is coming out. If you are interested in the state report I recommend you download it now as the initial decision is being appealed and it will probably get pulled from the website if the appeal is successful. The real question is why was it kept "hidden for years" as...