• Due to excessive bot signups along with nefarious actors we are limiting forum registration. Keep checking back for the register link to appear. Please do not send emails or have someone post to the forum asking for a signup link. Until the current climate changes we do not see a change of this policy. To join the forum you must have a compelling reason. Letting us know what skills/knowledge you will bring to the community along with the intent of your stay here will help in getting you approved.

State Of California Says Cellphone Radiation (EMF) Is Unsafe And Causes Brain Cancer

haidut

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
18,824
Location
USA / Europe
Little by little, the truth is coming out. If you are interested in the state report I recommend you download it now as the initial decision is being appealed and it will probably get pulled from the website if the appeal is successful. The real question is why was it kept "hidden for years" as the news report says...

CDPH cell phone document April 2014.pdf
Cellphone Radiation Exposure Fact Sheet Draft Released By California Health Officials
"...After keeping it hidden for years, California’s Department of Public Health has released a draft document outlining health officials’ concerns about cellphone radiation exposure. The previously unpublished document was released this week after a judge indicated she would order the documents be disclosed in the case Moskowitz v. CDPH."

"...Among the information in the document, which is titled simply, Cell Phones and Health, are summaries of scientific studies that suggest long-term cellphone use may increase the risk of brain cancer, among other health problems. The draft fact sheet states that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs), a type of radiation, are emitted from cellphones and that because they are “used frequently and kept close to the head and body, cellphone EMFs can affect nearby cells and tissues.”

"...Health officials’ overall recommendation is to “increase the distance between you and your phone” by using a headset, the speaker phone function and text messaging. Health officials recommend not sleeping near your phone and not carry it in your pocket or directly on your body, unless it is off. The fact sheet also states that “EMFs can pass deeper into a child’s brain than and adult’s” so suggests parents limit their child’s cellphone use to texting, important call and emergencies."
 

Attachments

  • CDPH cell phone document April 2014.pdf
    330.7 KB · Views: 48

CoolTweetPete

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
728
Age
36
Location
San Francisco
Baffling that whoever hid this probably won't be charged as a criminal.
 

milk_lover

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2015
Messages
1,826
Can they reengineer the cell phones so those emissions are reduced?

Also I don't know if those are the same, but I heard Macbook pro laptops emit the most electromagnetic waves. Too bad because they are my favorite laptops aside from their prices.
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
7,367
We've got a long way to go
and a short time to get there
 

Evgenius

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
119
Most people are so addicted to their handheld devices that they would probably ignore the facts and live with the consequences.
 

Constatine

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Messages
1,782
Just from reading your recent posts about the effects of electromagnetic fields on the body it terrifies me how much unnatural EMFs (even weaker ones) we are exposed to every day. And its just getting worse. Does anyone think grounding or earthing will nullify some of these negative effects? I'm sure correcting the body's charge will help but I don't think it will reverse any mitochondria damage.
 

Velve921

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
1,257
Little by little, the truth is coming out. If you are interested in the state report I recommend you download it now as the initial decision is being appealed and it will probably get pulled from the website if the appeal is successful. The real question is why was it kept "hidden for years" as the news report says...

CDPH cell phone document April 2014.pdf
Cellphone Radiation Exposure Fact Sheet Draft Released By California Health Officials
"...After keeping it hidden for years, California’s Department of Public Health has released a draft document outlining health officials’ concerns about cellphone radiation exposure. The previously unpublished document was released this week after a judge indicated she would order the documents be disclosed in the case Moskowitz v. CDPH."

"...Among the information in the document, which is titled simply, Cell Phones and Health, are summaries of scientific studies that suggest long-term cellphone use may increase the risk of brain cancer, among other health problems. The draft fact sheet states that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs), a type of radiation, are emitted from cellphones and that because they are “used frequently and kept close to the head and body, cellphone EMFs can affect nearby cells and tissues.”

"...Health officials’ overall recommendation is to “increase the distance between you and your phone” by using a headset, the speaker phone function and text messaging. Health officials recommend not sleeping near your phone and not carry it in your pocket or directly on your body, unless it is off. The fact sheet also states that “EMFs can pass deeper into a child’s brain than and adult’s” so suggests parents limit their child’s cellphone use to texting, important call and emergencies."

In light to this information, in your opinion, what would be a proper protocol to oppose this threat?
 

haidut

Member
Thread starter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
18,824
Location
USA / Europe
In light to this information, in your opinion, what would be a proper protocol to oppose this threat?

Keep the phone away from your body, at least 2 feet if possible. Also, if possible leave the phone in another room before going to bed. There are threads on this forum about protecting from EMF. Selenium, magnesium and drugs like cyproheptadine may help.
 

Marcus1000

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2017
Messages
44
I know this is a big topic in India aswell, I remember reading somewhere that they were using massive concrete blocks to fence off signals of new 4G cell-phone towers.

Also found this interesting document from India, a huge compilation of possible health hazards due to cell-phone usage:
https://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/~mwave/GK-cell-tower-rad-report-DOT-Dec2010.pdf

I know of two people who supposedly got cancer from phone usage.
A male (20~ish y/o) got testicle cancer, he always had phone in his pocket and was very much with laptop on his lap throughout the day.
A female (20~ish y/o) who got breast cancer, she was known to carry a cellphone all day in a chest pocket on her shirt, on the exact spot where they found the breast cancer...
Of course these can be just coincidences, but I find it suspicious to say the least, since they were otherwise healthy young people with no family history of such problems at such young age.
 

Velve921

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
1,257
Keep the phone away from your body, at least 2 feet if possible. Also, if possible leave the phone in another room before going to bed. There are threads on this forum about protecting from EMF. Selenium, magnesium and drugs like cyproheptadine may help.

I put my phone on airplane mode when sleeping, thoughts? I also take cyproheptadine at night and do lots of epsom salt baths and coffee.

Selenium intake could be higher.

When talking on the phone, do you use any special headsets? Or keep on speaker?
 

sladerunner69

Member
Joined
May 24, 2013
Messages
3,289
Age
29
Location
Los Angeles
A small increase in cancer risk but still substantial Ray Peat is correct in stating that the biggest problem is not the size or structure of the government but just the restriction of information.
 

DaveFoster

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Messages
4,931
Location
Spokane, Washington

Attachments

  • 419011_PtvXgcOt.jpg
    419011_PtvXgcOt.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 92

Agent207

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2015
Messages
618
I knew that thread @Dave, very funny indeed. But even if you don't like his forms or attitude, I think the guy have been right on some strong health issues regarding EMF and light. Time is giving him credit in those aspects that are rising in relation with health and that he always strongly warned about. He was taken by paranoid some years ago when everyone thought emfs were not that mach to care about.

He can be wrong on other things, like Ray does... there's no God with all the right answers for everything. Problem is that people here just discredit him de-facto because some confronting points; but above all, he's discredited mainly because his "personality". Peat sounds and looks more like the old wise man away from the lights, and Kruse is more of an eccentric extravagant figure.

And this is what I think is the big fail of some people towards him. Forms doesn't mean someone is or not on the right or wrong for everything.

I see Peat research a bit outdated, I mean it was ground-breaking more 20 years ago and before, on the rising of vegetable oils. Today things have changed enormously, in the last 10 years, and we face bigger menaces than the pufas which is the only rock-solid thing Peat has found. But looks that at some point he got stuck on that.. the anti-serotonin, anti-pufa.. etc talk, like if everything gravitates around that. NOT TODAY. And that is where new researchers like Kruse continue the ride on today's living.

Peat time has passed, we got his message, time to move forward. I don't see the man minding about the terrible impact the nonstop rising emf exposure will have on us in the near future.

We need another "Rays" that unmask the next pufa-like menaces.

(PD. I also believe in the benefits of cold exposure, but I knew this long before know about Kruse).
 
Last edited:

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,586
Location
Not Uganda
I knew that thread @Dave, very funny indeed. But even if you don't like his forms or attitude, I think the guy have been right on some strong health issues regarding EMF and light. Time is giving him credit in those aspects that are rising in relation with health and that he always strongly warned about. He was taken by paranoid some years ago when everyone thought emfs were not that mach to care about.

He can be wrong on other things, like Ray does... there's no God with all the right answers for everything. Problem is that people here just discredit him de-facto because some confronting points; but above all, he's discredited mainly because his "personality". Peat sounds and looks more like the old wise man away from the lights, and Kruse is more of an eccentric extravagant figure.

And this is what I think is the big fail of some people towards him. Forms doesn't mean someone is or not on the right or wrong for everything.

I see Peat research a bit outdated, I mean it was ground-breaking more 20 years ago and before, on the rising of vegetable oils. Today things have changed enormously, in the last 10 years, and we face bigger menaces than the pufas which is the only rock-solid thing Peat has found. But looks that at some point he got stuck on that.. the anti-serotonin, anti-pufa.. etc talk, like if everything gravitates around that. NOT TODAY. And that is where new researchers like Kruse continue the ride on today's living.

Peat time has passed, we got his message, time to move forward. I don't see the man minding about the terrible impact the nonstop rising emf exposure will have on us in the near future.

We need another "Rays" that unmask the next pufa-like menaces.

(PD. I also believe in the benefits of cold exposure, but I knew this long before know about Kruse).
His main point is not PUFA restriction, but the restriction of everything that affects the metabolism negatively, or the opposite: supporting nothing that has no effect on genes positively. No, wait, something wrong. Positively supporting nothing that has no genes on effect. Never mind..
 

sele

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
237
Why do we have so many trolls on this forum nowadays ?
They are polluting the purity of RP's research.
They should go to their respective forums and share their BS ideas.
If you don't like RP's ideas, what the h*** are you doing here?
There is a debate section on this forum for Jack Kruse and Mercola BS.
@charlie and the mods should do something.
:banplz
 

Similar threads

Top