Trump Elected Again?

[Tristan Loscha]

While your statement about parents loving and sacrificing for their kids I agree with, it is the ideal, and there are plenty of examples where people fail to live up to that ideal, some of them falling short quite badly, which has severe consequences for children.

I would rather have a way for people that shouldn’t have children to not have them in the first place, rather than having to spend so much money and decades of support trying to un-scramble the damage done by irresponsible parents and unwanted children.

Also as one lady earlier stated there are many conditions now in women that can quite negatively effect the health of unborn children, which in previous societies never occurred. In these situations I also agree with termination. These women may indeed have other children, and can be partners, sisters, daughters and form a connected network in their community. Do you expect women in these situations to either die due to the complications of their pregnancy, or have to raise a child that is mentally and physically damaged?

+1
Mentally immature parents are a burden for children, and the adoption systems are imperfect.

 

[Tristan Loscha]

Ray said that we are at our metabolic peak while in the womb, we are at our liveliest moment. He said it is ironic the pro-life choice is in the craziest party

It sounds like you want to paint Peat as opposed to abortion rights.

 

[Tristan Loscha]

Yes, he is zealous about the flag, but what he said was it's something he would like to see taken up by the legislative process. He has no power to punish flag burners.

Trump is too partisan and uses demagoguery and propaganda techniques to speak directly to his favorite populace, and is no more a head of state for all citizens of the USA.
Also the defunding of the alleged deep state, which is the veiled defunding of rightfully opposing elements of society, and undue vacancies in important positions, leading to further decay of needed infrastructure.

"BuRn iT aLl dOwN" will lead to loss of civilization, something which is already to be seen in the USA, compared to the more restrained european societies. As they become more american in culture, the depravity also increases.
I know that most do not want that at all, but how our leaders align themselves with the interests of the populace is not known at at that point, and trump is just goofy and not the people's champion, americans need one desperatedly, but he isn' it.

I find his manner not unsympathetic, he has a sense of humor, and does not take himself too important, atleast not during his parades. He is a trustfund baby though and very wall street. He burns it all down to reduce the prices, ("That makes me smart!!!") disrupt the market, and wants to fashion himself as a top leader in a postapocalyptic, post decay oligarchy like russia.

That is the endgame for anti - egalitarists like Koch, Murdoch and the mercers,and also trump. The unwritten ideology of them hinges upon the idea that the unwashed masses are genetically inferior, not made inferior due to manutrition, which is the contemporary main driver. This is stemming from sexual complexes and passive - aggressive sexual competition, and the jealous eye of born abusers, who wish to rationalize the terror they want to perpetually inflict upon others.

 

[Stramonium]

Like

It sounds like you want to paint Peat as opposed to abortion rights.

I'd find the interviews but I have other things to do. I think it was with Danny Roddy

 

[Tristan Loscha]

Still relevant:

Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media – Feature, Documentary

 

[nomoreketones]

Trump is too partisan and uses demagoguery and propaganda techniques to speak directly to his favorite populace, and is no more a head of state for all citizens of the USA.

Trump? Are you sure you are not talking about the Democrats? From everything I've seen the Democrats constantly use demagoguery and propaganda techniques in an attempt to gaslight the American people into believing that Americans live in a structurally racist society. The democrats entire election strategy is to divide the country using hate as a tool. They are attempting to use this manufactured hate to drive people to the ballot box to vote against Trump. I think most Americans see through this charade and will vote for Trump who by the way was the first president in US history to support gay marriage his entire presidency - just a factoid that the left wing propaganda outlets always ignore.

As opposed to the Democrats use of propaganda and demagoguery, Trump focuses on being a good president for Americans of all races, all genders, and all sexual orientations. Trumps main focus is to elevate all American workers regardless of identity.

 

[YourUniverse]

Yes, he is zealous about the flag, but what he said was it's something he would like to see taken up by the legislative process. He has no power to punish flag burners.

As a Canadian I was always under the impression that it was against the law to damage a flag

 

[Tristan Loscha]

Trump? Are you sure you are not talking about the Democrats? From everything I've seen the Democrats constantly use demagoguery and propaganda techniques in an attempt to gaslight the American people into believing that Americans live in a structurally racist society. The democrats entire election strategy is to divide the country using hate as a tool. They are attempting to use this manufactured hate to drive people to the ballot box to vote against Trump. I think most Americans see through this charade and will vote for Trump who by the way was the first president in US history to support gay marriage his entire presidency - just a factoid that the left wing propaganda outlets always ignore.

As opposed to the Democrats use of propaganda and demagoguery, Trump focuses on being a good president for Americans of all races, all genders, and all sexual orientations. Trumps main focus is to elevate all American workers regardless of identity.

Yeah, it probably depends on what news and shows we watch. When i look up something like fox news, Trump is photographed properly, and Pelosi gets the bad angles and lighting. I still do not believe Trump's messaging, and tax cuts for billionaires seems to be as bad as it sounds.

 

[nomoreketones]

Yeah, it probably depends on what news and shows we watch. When i look up something like fox news, Trump is photographed properly, and Pelosi gets the bad angles and lighting. I still do not believe Trump's messaging, and tax cuts for billionaires seems to be as bad as it sounds.

The old brackets were 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35%, 39.6%.
The new brackets are 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35%, 37%

The standard deduction was almost doubled (not quite but close). This change helps low income people greatly. An increased standard deduction doesn't help wealthy people at all. ("A single filer's standard deduction increased from $6,350 in 2017 to $12,200 in 2019. The deduction for married joint filers increases from $12,700 in 2017 to $24,400 in 2019.")

Trump lowered the cap for the mortgage interest deduction which will hurt the super rich but won't hurt poor or working class people at all.

The idea that Trump's tax cuts were "tax cuts for billionaires" is just made up propaganda.

 

[Tristan Loscha]

The old brackets were 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35%, 39.6%.
The new brackets are 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35%, 37%

The standard deduction was almost doubled (not quite but close). This change helps low income people greatly. An increased standard deduction doesn't help wealthy people at all. ("A single filer's standard deduction increased from $6,350 in 2017 to $12,200 in 2019. The deduction for married joint filers increases from $12,700 in 2017 to $24,400 in 2019.")

Trump lowered the cap for the mortgage interest deduction which will hurt the super rich but won't hurt poor or working class people at all.

The idea that Trump's tax cuts were "tax cuts for billionaires" is just made up propaganda.

Interesting, but there are different analyses to be had for the the assessment of the benefactors of the act, but not sure one way or the other.

 

[Zpol]

Kim Iversen discusses the impact of filling RBB's seat with a conservative judge

Interesting thanks! It will be the more conservative states that feel the brunt of it if R v W gets overturned. That's concerning. Hopefully those who need the option are able to make changes at state level.
Extremism causes people to react irrationally. As shown with the democrats and their 'nuclear' option.
Not freaking out is key for sure.

 

[nomoreketones]

Brett Weinstein is both anti-Trump and anti-Biden. He is behind Unity 2020 which brings together a liberal and a conservative as a middle of the road alternative to Trump vs Biden. Anyone who is interested can read about it here:
A Plan to Save Our Republic

The crazy thing is Twitter banned the articles of unity account weeks ago for no apparent reason.
https://twitter.com/ArticlesOfUnity

 

[sweetpeat]

As a Canadian I was always under the impression that it was against the law to damage a flag

Here in the states, the Supreme Court ruled flag burning is a form of free speech, so a 1st amendment right.

 

[tankasnowgod]

Abortion is legal and paid by the state in Scandinavia and we seem to doing just fine. Guess its just a fundamental difference in that some people feel the need to force their own opinions on others. Sick is what is happening the US

Oh, the irony with this statement.

As soon as state funding is involved, it is a public matter. It ceases in any way to be private. Public and Private don't mix.

Think about this with other controversial issues.

Do you think Prostitution should be legal? Do you think it should be paid for by the state?

Do you think Pornography should be legal? Do you think it should be paid for by the state?

Should drugs like cocaine and heroin be legal? Should these drugs be paid for by the state?

You can very easily be supportive in answering "yes" to the first part, and strongly disagree with the second.

 

[Mito]

The only pollster worth anything is Rasmussen. Rasmussen differs from the rest because they poll likely voters rather than registered voters, which gives them a more accurate reflection of the population. They were the most accurate pollster in 2016, predicting Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.7% (final result was 2.0%). Currently, they show Trump winning over Biden by 7.

Rasmussen shows Biden winning over Trump by 1.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2020 - General Election: Trump vs. Biden

 

[postman]

Trump is too partisan and uses demagoguery and propaganda techniques to speak directly to his favorite populace, and is no more a head of state for all citizens of the USA.
Also the defunding of the alleged deep state, which is the veiled defunding of rightfully opposing elements of society, and undue vacancies in important positions, leading to further decay of needed infrastructure.

"BuRn iT aLl dOwN" will lead to loss of civilization, something which is already to be seen in the USA, compared to the more restrained european societies. As they become more american in culture, the depravity also increases.
I know that most do not want that at all, but how our leaders align themselves with the interests of the populace is not known at at that point, and trump is just goofy and not the people's champion, americans need one desperatedly, but he isn' it.

I find his manner not unsympathetic, he has a sense of humor, and does not take himself too important, atleast not during his parades. He is a trustfund baby though and very wall street. He burns it all down to reduce the prices, ("That makes me smart!!!") disrupt the market, and wants to fashion himself as a top leader in a postapocalyptic, post decay oligarchy like russia.

That is the endgame for anti - egalitarists like Koch, Murdoch and the mercers,and also trump. The unwritten ideology of them hinges upon the idea that the unwashed masses are genetically inferior, not made inferior due to manutrition, which is the contemporary main driver. This is stemming from sexual complexes and passive - aggressive sexual competition, and the jealous eye of born abusers, who wish to rationalize the terror they want to perpetually inflict upon others.

Koch supports the democrats now because Trump & the republicans now at least pretend to oppose radical open borders ideology. The billionaires, 3rd world immigrants, and communists all find common ground in that they hate the USA, hate free speech, hate individualism.

 

[nomoreketones]

Koch supports the democrats now because Trump & the republicans now at least pretend to oppose radical open borders ideology. The billionaires, 3rd world immigrants, and communists all find common ground in that they hate the USA, hate free speech, hate individualism.

In my opinion, many "Never Trump" republicans are backing the democrats because of their corporate interests. A major switch is happening and the Democratic party is becoming the party of giant corporations and the Republicans are becoming the party of the working class.

 

[postman]

In my opinion, many "Never Trump" republicans are backing the democrats because of their corporate interests. A major switch is happening and the Democratic party is becoming the party of giant corporations and the Republicans are becoming the party of the working class.

Both parties are the parties of giant corporations, the banking cartels, and foreign special interest. But the open border radicalism is especially important to rootless capitalists who have no care for the consequences of their short term profits. The republican anti-open border stance is a sham anyways.

 

[nomoreketones]

Both parties are the parties of giant corporations, the banking cartels, and foreign special interest. But the open border radicalism is especially important to rootless capitalists who have no care for the consequences of their short term profits. The republican anti-open border stance is a sham anyways.

This ties in with globalism and free trade. In theory free trade, due to the law of comparative advantage, will increase the wealth of a nation and by making workers more efficient that in turn is supposed to increase the worker's real wages. Unfortunately this is just a model and it is not working quite like that.

Globalism and free trade are indeed increasing the wealth of the United States but the benefit to the citizens is not proportionate. The super rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer, and the middle class is shrinking. It is getting more and more difficult for the average American to make it in the United States. It is even worse for the poor who have fewer connections to help them get a lucrative job.

Open borders just makes the problems worse for the poor and middle class. Globalism has reduced the value of the average american in the labor market (in real dollars) and open borders brings in more people to compete for the jobs which further reduces the value of the average american in the labor market. We do need some immigration to fuel our economy but the government should really do background checks on everyone who comes in and screen them. It is just not a good idea to let people walk in without checking their criminal history at least.

 

[LeeLemonoil]

Those behind Twitter don’t want reconciliation

Brett Weinstein is both anti-Trump and anti-Biden. He is behind Unity 2020 which brings together a liberal and a conservative as a middle of the road alternative to Trump vs Biden. Anyone who is interested can read about it here:
A Plan to Save Our Republic

The crazy thing is Twitter banned the articles of unity account weeks ago for no apparent reason.
https://twitter.com/ArticlesOfUnity[