Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Some body hair such as shoulder or back hair... Excessive nose hair might indeed be caused by cortisol increasing adrenal androgens and interfering with optimal progesterone/thyroid - But normal hair on the legs, central chest, pubic hair and of course the beard is a healthy sign of Testosterone (Gonadal testosterone ) and it's natural DHT metabolite in a man with receptors in place.... Testicular testosterone is released alongside Progesterone and doesn't aromatize as much instead follows a healthy metabolism to maintain masculine characteristics.
Don't men usually start the pattern seriously around 40 - 42 years old... When a life of exposure has damaged thyroid and Gonadal hormones in favour of adrenal ones.
A combo of T3+Testosterone+Progesterone+reducing stress and improving lifestyle and body composition would be the best approach at the beginning of the balding process I think.
Don’t you think losing hair is normal as you get older? Danny roddy actually mentioned in a interview with the strong sistas saying “guys normally a long time ago are suppose to bald in their Late 30’s or 40’s or 50’s not like 17.”
Not to sound ignorant but it’s kinda true, my dad is losing a bit of hair but at the same time, he had health issues on his own too and diabetes is one of his problems, he has a pretty good head of hair despite being almost 60 but that doesn’t mean it’s going to effect me ((his offspring.)), since it’s age that’s causing the hair loss but at same time, as you know hair loss is related to diseases and stresses mostly.
I would argue there is such thing as bad genes to a degree.The idea that children and teenagers are losing hair in such a early age and is considered natural and normal mind boggles the hell out of me how blindly ignorant these people can be. When I explained this too my dad a few months ago, he said that’s not normal and his opinion these children are practically sick.
Honestly pharmaceutical companies never helped the underlying cost of hair loss in general without addressing the conflict like nutrition, metabolism etc.
People and PhD scientists like ute deichmann tend to dismiss epigenetics however due to the lack of evidence The social construction of the social epigenome and the larger biological context | Epigenetics & Chromatin | Full Text <—- link where a long toxicity about epigenetics is full of horseshit too them.
Honestly when it comes to genetics and hair loss, it’s still failed miserably, because people as of now, they think hair loss happens for no reason or due to “weak/bad genes.” While in reality there’s no such thing as “bad genes” even a PhD biologist admitted that there’s no such thing as “bad genes.” In the human genome. The genetic determinism is ridiculous and very scary stuff, because I’m so scared to lose my little sister or my mom due to breast cancer.
I would argue there is such thing as bad genes to a degree.
For example Mutations that cause serious defect in normal function severely hindering survival.
syndromes per se
While balding is more or less the succesibility to a bad phenotype.
basically there is cause of balding and then there is the reaction to the cause and that is what makes 95% of what people experience. For example the biggest hit for the balding gene was the AR. That tells me that the reaction to the cause of balding is mainly determined by this gene.
But why and how? Like do they develop these for no reason despite healthier parents, nurtured very well, overall great lifestyle?
i mean a baldness gene on a child for example? I think this is a terrible way to describe this, it’s like a transgender gene, gay gene, depression gene or an evil gene exist but in reality they don’t.
The idea that children and teenagers are losing hair in such a early age and is considered natural and normal mind boggles the hell out of me how blindly ignorant these people can be. When I explained this too my dad a few months ago, he said that’s not normal and his opinion these children are practically sick.
Honestly pharmaceutical companies never helped the underlying cost of hair loss in general without addressing the conflict like nutrition, metabolism etc.
People and PhD scientists like ute deichmann tend to dismiss epigenetics however due to the lack of evidence The social construction of the social epigenome and the larger biological context | Epigenetics & Chromatin | Full Text <—- link where a long toxicity about epigenetics is full of horseshit too them.
Honestly when it comes to genetics and hair loss, it’s still failed miserably, because people as of now, they think hair loss happens for no reason or due to “weak/bad genes.” While in reality there’s no such thing as “bad genes” even a PhD biologist admitted that there’s no such thing as “bad genes.” In the human genome. The genetic determinism is ridiculous and very scary stuff, because I’m so scared to lose my little sister or my mom due to breast cancer.
i get the feeling these scientists have lost their minds.