General Orange
Member
I was talking about the libido 5HT1a and 5HT2c in particular, sorry
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
I think you can it’s called psychology which I studiedIm being confrontational aggressive.
You cannot possibly "tele-identify" someones neurotransmitter profile by interpreting someones messages that have somewhat aggressive and confrontational form and then stigmatizing them with "serotonin dominant" stereotype seems delusional to me. Probably because of the influence of misinterpreted stories about serotonin neurotransmitter levels theory back traceable to SSRI drug companies mixed with one of Peats articles about LSD and serotonin.
Neuro receptor upregulation (more input needed for the same effects) is not the same as enzyme upregulation (more effectiveness)
Now you have me trying to remember what happens in the synaptic cleft haha. You may be right@Elephanto
I have experienced downregulated serotonin receptors first hand, from MDMA abuse. And when downregulated, the inflow of serotonin will have an increased effect. Hence when an increased inflow of serotonin (agonist) is detected, the receptors will get downregulated so the net activity will be less, for the brain want to get in homeostasis. Afterwards stopping the increased inflow / drug there are less receptor and can be activated by just a little serotonin.
But if you apply serotonin antagonist the receptors will upregulate and increase in density, that afterwards more infow of serotonin is needed for an effect.
But if you apply serotonin antagonist the receptors will upregulate and increase in density, that afterwards more infow of serotonin is needed for an effect.
Dang u know a lot. Glad you share in my apprehensive hypothesis that cycling herbs could have a net effect. If ashwagandha fixes thyroid after a year of use it would be worth any mental detriment that would pass in time with a healthy individual.True but so far the strategies you mention are about using Serotonin agonists, not antagonists. And I didn't think you were specifically talking about receptor densities when you mentioned "upregulation", I thought you refered to agonism since you used it as an argument to defend a Serotonin agonist. MDMA is neurotoxic and likely to lead to chronically high cortisol (which increases Serotonin), what you interpret as a "lack of Serotonin" may be the result of other effects. Most of the things I've adviced you on Serotonin are more deeply systemic, attacking the issue at its root and from the other factors that promote it (same for NO). Essential minerals with NMDA, Nitric Oxide or general stress antagonism and Amino Acids that potentiate negative factors are stored in the body, they don't only produce a temporary effect.
As for the herbs/spices, some of the ones you mentioned raise NO (Gingko Biloba), have contraceptive or anti-androgenic effects (Cat's Claw, Licorice), Ginseng activates 5-ht2a and in some cases ER-Alpha, some potentiate CAMP which in excess promotes tumor growth. Despite these trade-offs, some of them can still have net beneficial effects in moderation. Using an herb with serotonin agonistic properties every day is likely to affect you negatively but the potency of Ashwaghanda at positively shifting various parameters can have long-lasting effects that do not require continual usage. If you take your time to examine every mechanisms an herb has, you will most likely arrive at the same conclusion I did. It's just how nature works.
Would you say you experienced HPPD symptoms?@Elephanto Im just glad I found st Johns wort and that it was helpful with my MDMA / SSRI anhedonia and depersonalization issues.
Thanks for the general warning on herbal use, they should be cycled indeed. Some are bad for liver. Most of them stop working after a year of continuous use. Others need few months of taking them to work. They are a pain in the **** to figure out, but I like the challenge. Personally I'll be making my own regimen formula with Licorce root coz it is one of my favoritesgreat with some rum haha.
@Arrade Thanks for bringing the focus back on topic decalification!
I think caffeine is good against serotonin excess and a good support for cardiovascular system. some studies say 3 cups a day keeps arteries clean from calcification (calcium phosphate)
btw I read Ashwagandha makes changes to mRNA receptor level when repartitioning 5HT1a to 5HT2c, so after a few month use it could have permanent effects. Useful for Premature Ejaculation cases.
No, that did not happen. I think that is with LSD and mushrooms.Would you say you experienced HPPD symptoms?
btw I read Ashwagandha makes changes to mRNA receptor level when repartitioning 5HT1a to 5HT2c, so after a few month use it could have permanent effects. Useful for Premature Ejaculation cases.
Here it increases to 34% and 30% more risks at 1 cup per day and 2-3 per day, with 8% reduction risks at less than 1 per day. There is also a large variation (0.86-2.08) giving weight to my theory that its effect probably depends on the extent at which it triggers stress in individuals.prevalence ratio (95% CI) for CAC was 1.0 (reference), 0.92 (0.57–1.49), 1.34 (0.86–2.08), 1.30 (0.84–2.02), and 0.99 (0.60–1.64) for coffee consumption of almost never, <1/day, 1/day, 2–3/day, and ≥4 cups/day
Compared to never coffee drinkers, regular coffee intake (≥1 cup/day) was not statistically associated with coronary artery calcium progression or cardiovascular events
Here only tea significantly reduced risks by 29% (mainly Theanine being anti-cortisol ?)participants who regularly drank tea (≥1 cup per day) had a slower progression of coronary artery calcium compared with never drinkers after multivariable adjustment. This correlated with a statistically significant lower incidence of cardiovascular events for ≥1 cup per day tea drinkers (adjusted hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95)
Nonsignificant in smoking men but a promoting one in non-smoking men (78% more risks at >4 cups a day, 23% more risks at 3 to 4 cups)A nonsignificant inverse relationship was also found in men who smoked, whereas in nonsmoking men a direct association was observed.
Very interestingly imo, this one done in Brazil is the only one to find a positive effect. It could be due to the fact that life is simpler and not as hectic as modern western lifestyle. Paradoxal if you consider crime rates and such but I observe it from poor environments, people seem to function less on stress. Year-long optimal Vitamin D could also contribute (potently decreases cortisol), maybe better coffee quality and less exposure to blue lights from screens.After stratification by smoking status, the analysis revealed a lower OR of coronary calcification in never smokers drinking >3 cups/d (OR: 0.37 [95% confidence interval, 0.15–0.91])
Reading back, Im not so sure about my explanation myself anymore. heheI am IGNORANT of the HT1 vs T2 stuff. I believe it, I imagine since you make serotonin that your body does need a certain form of it in healthy amounts.
You’re coming off kind of viscious here, frankly I only mentioned the serotonin because of my own trepidation.
But the fact you’re pretty sarcastic right now would show excessive serotonin.
Also I think the upregulating would do the opposite and allow more reception of it
This explains how I felt about it. Drinking black coffee gave me energy but I’d only want to exercise, I would lose motivation to study or do something at a slow pace. I also felt it was bad for the heart and hair, though once a day seems ok.I've checked for application in real life :
Coffee consumption and calcified atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary arteries: The NHLBI Family Heart Study
Here it increases to 34% and 30% more risks at 1 cup per day and 2-3 per day, with 8% reduction risks at less than 1 per day. There is also a large variation (0.86-2.08) giving weight to my theory that its effect probably depends on the extent at which it triggers stress in individuals.
Associations between Coffee, Tea, and Caffeine Intake with Coronary Artery Calcification and Cardiovascular Events
Here only tea significantly reduced risks by 29% (mainly Theanine being anti-cortisol ?)
Coffee consumption and coronary calcification: the Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. - PubMed - NCBI
Nonsignificant in smoking men but a promoting one in non-smoking men (78% more risks at >4 cups a day, 23% more risks at 3 to 4 cups)
Coffee, Decaffeinated Coffee, Caffeine, and Tea Consumption in Young Adulthood and Atherosclerosis Later in Life: The CARDIA Study
No association found with coffee but a non-significant inverse one with Tea.
Coffee Consumption and Coronary Artery Calcium Score: Cross‐Sectional Results of ELSA‐Brasil (Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health)
Very interestingly imo, this one done in Brazil is the only one to find a positive effect. It could be due to the fact that life is simpler and not as hectic as modern western lifestyle. Paradoxal if you consider crime rates and such but I observe it from poor environments, people seem to function less on stress. Year-long optimal Vitamin D could also contribute (potently decreases cortisol), maybe better coffee quality and less exposure to blue lights from screens.
So results vary. I think it really depends on the personalities of people, intake of carbs to support its metabolic effect and stress levels at the time of consumption. Personally I like to take coffee when I know I'll be relaxing.