Anti-histamines May Prevent, Treat Melanoma

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
About 2 years ago I did a post discussing the hypothesis that melanoma is an endocrine tumor, similar to breast cancer - i.e. driven by estrogen. In fact, if one has the time to dig into the published literature on all known malignancies, it quickly becomes apparent that virtually all cancers can be classified as "endocrine" (hormone-sensitive) and there is strong evidence that they are all driven by excess estrogen. Conversely, substances known to interfere with estrogen signalling (e.g. progesterone, DHT, pregnenolone, testosterone, vitamin E, aspirin, etc) are therapeutic regardless of the tumor type they are applied to.

One of the lesser-known recent findings in endocrinology is that hormones exert their most of their effects not through classic steroid receptors but through "peripheral mechanisms". Case in point - most of estrogen's systemic effects on cellular proliferation are exerted through the histaminergic and cholinergic systems. As such, interfering with one of both of those systems significantly inhibit (or fully blocks) the effects of estrogen in tissues. This "peculiarity" was first noted back in the 1960s when epidemiological studies discovered that anti-histamines (commonly used as allergy drugs) had profound beneficial effects on initiation, progression, and lethality of breast cancers in humans. Unfortunately, those findings did not materialize in intervention studies or public policy changes to improve breast cancer rates or disease course through the use of antihistamines.

Now, a new study makes the connection between melanoma and estrogen even stronger by demonstrating that anti-histamine drugs are protective in such patients, while having no side effects. One could only hope that this will re-ignite the interest in non-genomic pathways of hormonal action and intervention studies with anti-histamines will be performed soon. Judging from the epidemiological studies, it seems likely that simply taking an anti-histamine like Benadryl on a daily basis could cut by at least 50% BOTH the newly diagnosed cases of endocrine malignancies such as breast cancer and subsequent deaths from it. The impact on melanoma would probably be similar and considering this is one of the deadliest cancers, it would save many lives.

Error - Cookies Turned Off
Antihistamines may help patients with malignant melanoma

"...“Previous studies have shown that the same antihistamines have survival benefits in breast cancer. Now we see the same thing concerning malignant melanoma. However, more research is required to confirm the results”, emphasises Professor Håkan Olsson. He is one of the researchers behind the study, which was recently published in the research journal, Allergy. In the study, the researchers examined the use of six antihistamines in patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma; desloratadine, cetirizine, loratadine, clemastine, ebastine and fexofenadine."

“...We observed improved survival among those who used desloratadine and to a certain extent also loratadine, particularly in the age group 65 and older, when we compared with those who had not used antihistamines. The use of the other antihistamines showed no significant survival effect. The use of desloratadine and loratadine also seemed to reduce the risk of getting a new malignant melanoma”, says Håkan Olsson. “The finding is interesting for a future drug against melanoma and may also help in advanced stages of the disease. In addition, the medicines have virtually no side effects.” The research team is now planning animal experiments and randomised studies in order to understand the mechanisms behind the effect, the appropriate dose and optimum treatment period. “We are collaborating with researchers in Barcelona and Stockholm. In Lund, we are underway with studies in both animal and human subjects, in which doses of antihistamines will be compared with the patients who do not take antihistamines, in order to measure the treatment effect”, concludes Håkan Olsson."
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
Didn't you say somewhere that anti-histamines increase adrenaline?
 

Ben Stone

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
65
I wasn't aware of the melanoma/anti-histamine research and it's interesting. Luckily the blog had links to the original publications because Haidut misrepresents the findings of that research.

Haidut writes, "Judging from the epidemiological studies, it seems likely that simply taking an anti-histamine like Benadryl on a daily basis could cut by at least 50% BOTH the newly diagnosed cases of endocrine malignancies such as breast cancer and subsequent deaths from it." That is false.

In fact, Olsson et. al. research suggests that most anti-histamines would make no difference. Benadryl (Diphenhydramine) wasn't included among the 6 anti-histamines studied (desloratadine, cetirizine, loratadine, clemastine, ebastine, and fexofenadine).

Of the 6, two may be beneficial: Desloratadine and Loratadine. In their study of antihistamines and breast cancer, Olsson et. al write about the antihistamine known by the brand name Tavist: "Clemastine use peri-diagostically was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer-related death." So taking Tavist "on a daily basis" could be deadly for people with melanoma. Which makes that Benadryl recommendation worrisome.

I'll be interested to see Olsson's further antihistamine/cancer research. Until then I'm holding off taking desloratadine.

This is their original breast cancer study:
Ildikó Fritz, Philippe Wagner, Per Broberg, Rickard Einefors, Håkan Olsson, Desloratadine and loratadine stand out among common H 1 -antihistamines for association with improved breast cancer survival , Acta Oncologica, 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1769185, (1-7), (2020).
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1769185


And here's a more accurate summary of the Olsson/melanoma research:


2020 MAY 31 (VerticalNews) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at VerticalNews Health & Science --

Can a very common allergy medicine improve survival among patients suffering from the serious skin cancer, malignant melanoma? A new study from Lund University in Sweden indicates that this may be the case.

"Previous studies have shown that the same antihistamines have survival benefits in breast cancer. Now we see the same thing concerning malignant melanoma. However, more research is required to confirm the results", emphasises Professor Hakan Olsson. He is one of the researchers behind the study, which was recently published in the research journal, Allergy.

In the study, the researchers examined the use of six antihistamines in patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma; desloratadine, cetirizine, loratadine, clemastine, ebastine and fexofenadine.

They have matched information from three large registers (the prescribed drug register, cancer register and cause of death register) for everyone in Sweden between 2006 and 2014 who received their first diagnosis of skin cancer, a total of 24 562 individuals. Of these individuals, 1 253 were antihistamine users. Most used desloratadine (395) cetirizine (324), loratadine (251) or clemastine (192). The other antihistamines were used by considerably fewer individuals. The follow-up of individuals was carried out on 31 December 2018.

"We observed improved survival among those who used desloratadine and to a certain extent also loratadine, particularly in the age group 65 and older, when we compared with those who had not used antihistamines. The use of the other antihistamines showed no significant survival effect. The use of desloratadine and loratadine also seemed to reduce the risk of getting a new malignant melanoma", says Hakan Olsson.

"The finding is interesting for a future drug against melanoma and may also help in advanced stages of the disease. In addition, the medicines have virtually no side effects."

The research team is now planning animal experiments and randomised studies in order to understand the mechanisms behind the effect, the appropriate dose and optimum treatment period.

"We are collaborating with researchers in Barcelona and Stockholm. In Lund, we are underway with studies in both animal and human subjects, in which doses of antihistamines will be compared with the patients who do not take antihistamines, in order to measure the treatment effect", concludes Hakan Olsson.
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
I wasn't aware of the melanoma/anti-histamine research and it's interesting. Luckily the blog had links to the original publications because Haidut misrepresents the findings of that research.

Haidut writes, "Judging from the epidemiological studies, it seems likely that simply taking an anti-histamine like Benadryl on a daily basis could cut by at least 50% BOTH the newly diagnosed cases of endocrine malignancies such as breast cancer and subsequent deaths from it." That is false.

In fact, Olsson et. al. research suggests that most anti-histamines would make no difference. Benadryl (Diphenhydramine) wasn't included among the 6 anti-histamines studied (desloratadine, cetirizine, loratadine, clemastine, ebastine, and fexofenadine).

Of the 6, two may be beneficial: Desloratadine and Loratadine. In their study of antihistamines and breast cancer, Olsson et. al write about the antihistamine known by the brand name Tavist: "Clemastine use peri-diagostically was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer-related death." So taking Tavist "on a daily basis" could be deadly for people with melanoma. Which makes that Benadryl recommendation worrisome.

I'll be interested to see Olsson's further antihistamine/cancer research. Until then I'm holding off taking desloratadine.

This is their original breast cancer study:
Ildikó Fritz, Philippe Wagner, Per Broberg, Rickard Einefors, Håkan Olsson, Desloratadine and loratadine stand out among common H 1 -antihistamines for association with improved breast cancer survival , Acta Oncologica, 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1769185, (1-7), (2020).
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1769185


And here's a more accurate summary of the Olsson/melanoma research:


2020 MAY 31 (VerticalNews) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at VerticalNews Health & Science --

Can a very common allergy medicine improve survival among patients suffering from the serious skin cancer, malignant melanoma? A new study from Lund University in Sweden indicates that this may be the case.

"Previous studies have shown that the same antihistamines have survival benefits in breast cancer. Now we see the same thing concerning malignant melanoma. However, more research is required to confirm the results", emphasises Professor Hakan Olsson. He is one of the researchers behind the study, which was recently published in the research journal, Allergy.

In the study, the researchers examined the use of six antihistamines in patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma; desloratadine, cetirizine, loratadine, clemastine, ebastine and fexofenadine.

They have matched information from three large registers (the prescribed drug register, cancer register and cause of death register) for everyone in Sweden between 2006 and 2014 who received their first diagnosis of skin cancer, a total of 24 562 individuals. Of these individuals, 1 253 were antihistamine users. Most used desloratadine (395) cetirizine (324), loratadine (251) or clemastine (192). The other antihistamines were used by considerably fewer individuals. The follow-up of individuals was carried out on 31 December 2018.

"We observed improved survival among those who used desloratadine and to a certain extent also loratadine, particularly in the age group 65 and older, when we compared with those who had not used antihistamines. The use of the other antihistamines showed no significant survival effect. The use of desloratadine and loratadine also seemed to reduce the risk of getting a new malignant melanoma", says Hakan Olsson.

"The finding is interesting for a future drug against melanoma and may also help in advanced stages of the disease. In addition, the medicines have virtually no side effects."

The research team is now planning animal experiments and randomised studies in order to understand the mechanisms behind the effect, the appropriate dose and optimum treatment period.

"We are collaborating with researchers in Barcelona and Stockholm. In Lund, we are underway with studies in both animal and human subjects, in which doses of antihistamines will be compared with the patients who do not take antihistamines, in order to measure the treatment effect", concludes Hakan Olsson.
Thanks for looking deeper into the study.
 

TobyBjorn

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2019
Messages
70
The primary reason it appears cut-and-dry in these studies is because of the arbitrary choice science has made for itself to consider “P value” cutoff as the measure of statistical significance instead of accepting the more complex task of dealing directly with the probability gradients found in the real word. The P=0.05 cutoff for significance is a perfectly reasonable standard, but it seems we have come to think of it as a binary true/false gate instead of an irrelevant aspect of interpreting good data; null data is good data because research is about getting data.
It does appear from these studies that antihistamines can reduce cancer, and some drugs are better than others. The nuance of why different antihistamines perform differently in cancer is a science field ripe for the pickin.
 
Last edited:
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom