Lee Simeon
Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2017
- Messages
- 494
And why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
When the people who remember polio and that vaccine are dead, we will get some real progress and figure out what's what. Until then, nope.
It's one of these subjects too complicated and nuanced for a meaningful public discussion. It's low info people screeching at each other all around, unfortunately. I know enough to know that I have no idea what an optimal public vaccine schedule would be.
The fundamental problem is political. We still don't know how to entrust sufficiently qualified experts on matters like these. The so-called experts in so many fields have clocked up really lousy track records over the last century.
I am not sure its any more complicated than some of Ray's theories and certainly less complicated than Haidut's and Tyw's debates. With that said I think as a democracy we shouldn't avoid debating these subjects out amongst the public. Letting the experts take over has gotten us into big trouble in many areas, not just vaccines. GMOs, Aspertame, PUFAs, the Federal Debt, education, global warming are a few areas where trusting the experts really got us screwed.It's one of these subjects too complicated and nuanced for a meaningful public discussion. It's low info people screeching at each other all around, unfortunately. I know enough to know that I have no idea what an optimal public vaccine schedule would be.
The fundamental problem is political. We still don't know how to entrust sufficiently qualified experts on matters like these. The so-called experts in so many fields have clocked up really lousy track records over the last century.
We still don't know how to entrust sufficiently qualified experts on matters like these. The so-called experts in so many fields have clocked up really lousy track records over the last century.
Agreed. This Myocarditis after Vaccination – is good evidence of harm done-- 3% of heathy people react with myocarditis. I wonder what the best Peaty fix for that would be? -- the usual anti-inflammatory measures, I suppose.I think they're based on a flawed understanding of the immune system and only do harm.
How did the climate experts taking over affect us in a poorly manner?I am not sure its any more complicated than some of Ray's theories and certainly less complicated than Haidut's and Tyw's debates. With that said I think as a democracy we shouldn't avoid debating these subjects out amongst the public. Letting the experts take over has gotten us into big trouble in many areas, not just vaccines. GMOs, Aspertame, PUFAs, the Federal Debt, education, global warming are a few areas where trusting the experts really got us screwed.
I don't want to hijack the thread but if you really look past the propaganda regarding climate change it's not nearly as well understood as claimed. There is much evidence of outright fraud to demonize CO2 which is actually very healthful for the atmosphere and all life on earth. Just like the other items I mentioned above, we are being consistently lied to by the "experts." To your point, efforts to reduce CO2 production have wasted enormous resources that could have been better spent on other issues, one being real environmental issues.How did the climate experts taking over affect us in a poorly manner?
Take your pick; GMOs, xenoestrogens, plastic garbage islands in oceans, pharmaceuticals in drinking water, sewage sludge used as fertilizer, mercury and aluminum in vaccines, toxic metals from waste to energy plants, EMFs, mercury in CFLs, radiation leaks from nuclear plants, all real imo. Man made climate change not real.What do you mean is real environmental issues?