tankasnowgod
Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2014
- Messages
- 8,131
Why would that matter in court? There, it's only the facts that are presented, or agreed upon, that matter. Not what people may "believe." And not even what is "true."Unfortunately, due to the level of indoctrination and corruption, the scientific arguments have not yet been fruitful for the legal efforts; thus our navigation of the constitutional law to help people get exemptions and preserve their lives- bandaids but one that helped a lot of people- i have been very successful getting people exemptions with some exceptions such as the healthcare workers in NY where a regulation was passed banning the religious exemption for them. WE filed a federal court class action for them which is going to be appealed from corrupt decision denying it. this is an example where NY has thrown the constitution of this country out the window. We also used the science; but as i said, the indoctrination and fear are huge obstacles despite its truth as you and i know it.
It should be relatively straight forward to show that Covid Shots cause 1000x the death reports to VAERS of any other vaccine in any other comparable time period. It should be easy to show a similar trend in any adverse reaction. Enter the VAERS data for the Pfizer vax from 2020- current or so, and the same for Moderna and J&J. Also, enter the data for flu shots from 2017 and 2018. And any other vaccine you care to enter data for. Enter Peter Doshi's critique, he's an editor for the BMJ. And point out how the discrepancy in the individuals that were excluded for "protocol violations." 311 were excluded in the vaccine group, only 60 in the placebo. Since there were only 170 total cases of so called "Coivd," that 251 participant difference is massive, and could have completely swung the 2 month clinical trial results in the opposite direction.
It is also easy to demonstrate that the Covid Shots did not meet the FDA's standard for "approval" when they were given EUA back in December 2020. How could they? A five year process was crammed into 8 months. Even though some of those drugs may have gotten "approval," it's clear that they didn't meet the standards the FDA set prior to 2019. Enter those standards into evidence, and enter the Pfizer trial data into evidence, and the same with Moderna and J&J. I don't think there is any question in anyone's mind that two months is less than two or three years. Also, enter into evidence the admission by all the drug companies that they offered the vaccine to everyone in the placebo group at the 6 month mark, unblinding the trial and effectively ending it prematurely, at when it was only about a quarter complete.