J
James IV
Guest
This is a strawman before you edit lol!
Experiment and experience same thing as mentioned peer review system and financial is a different matter.
If you say so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
This is a strawman before you edit lol!
Experiment and experience same thing as mentioned peer review system and financial is a different matter.
Lol. Feelings not hurt . Just meant that the last two sentences nullified my post.Wanted to debate not hurt feelings lol
But when your great none of that matters....... in other words we only need what he has picked up in his culture created by others before him....
David Brent - Simply the Best - The Office - BBC - YouTube
Show me what evidence the OP provided to refute my claims based on science and studies? And no I didn't just randomly jump in here me and the OP have discussed before on similar topics. He blatantly called out fasting and made a big claim, of course we are going to "jump" in here not sure how else you reply on a thread? If anyone jumped in it was you going off on the people that disagreed with you in the first 10 seconds you joined the thread lmao.
I'm going to start calling you scarecrow, you have used the term strawman in every single thread or topic that someone disagrees with you. For anyone reading, go check out the "nicotine through a peat prism" thread, he almost loses it on the OP in that thread as well, it is hilarious, I never seen someone that offended by nicotine. It seems you have a problem with nicotine Any time you can't reply back with an argument you say "that is a strawman" instead of substance based argument.
People have stayed clear, are you blind? It has over 100K views, Charlie is banning people like you from it every two seconds you have zero substance and just cry strawman. You really are clueless.
For the record, I have a full head of hair (luckily)and don't have a problem (or ever did) with girls lmao and I never reported you or anyone, I think is is good to argue honestly, but you can ask Charlie if you don't believe me.
If you say so.
The sad thing is he thinks I'm anti Peat, which I'm not, I stated that like 10 times lol
And I was Gbol harshest critic in the beginning before he started replying on normal threads, if you read my old posts lol
I'm going to start calling you scarecrow, you have used the term strawman in every single thread or topic that someone disagrees with you
The sad thing is he thinks I'm anti Peat, which I'm not, I stated that like 10 times lol
And I was Gbol harshest critic in the beginning before he started replying on normal threads, if you read my old posts lol
Check this out also,somebody picked up on RU in 2011 -
Success on RU
There is an insane amount hairless forums,there’s more than porn sites.
I'll respond to your other points, but I had to respond to this because it is hilarious.
You are confusing two drugs. There is RU58841, the anti androgen hair drug and there is RU486 the anti progesterone drug that @gbolduev is referencing. They are not related at all and no one in the hair loss world is using RU486.
ALL of the hair loss sites are referring to RU58841 like the link you just posted and didn't even take the time to read through once again.
Seriously dude, I don't even think you read what you write or even the evidence you present, no wonder why you just say straw man all the time. You didn't even know the drug @gbolduev was talking about this entire time.
I'll respond to your other points, but I had to respond to this because it is hilarious.
You are confusing two drugs. There is RU58841, the anti androgen hair drug and there is RU486 the anti progesterone drug that @gbolduev is referencing. They are not related at all and no one in the hair loss world is using RU486.
ALL of the hair loss sites are referring to RU58841 like the link you just posted and didn't even take the time to read through once again.
Seriously dude, I don't even think you read what you write or even the evidence you present, no wonder why you just say straw man all the time. You didn't even know the drug @gbolduev was talking about this entire time.
Turth is, no one really seems to know exactly what gbolduev is saying, hence the lengthy debates and such. Here's a proposal: why don't Gbolduev and all his guinea pigs go live in his hometown where you can be experimented on in his lab, and when there is actual proof of what he's saying you can all report back to this forum! Plus it will double as some good male bonding time. I think it will be special.
Actually, people do understand what he is saying. We have multiple private PM groups going with great results, although it's still early in the process.Turth is, no one really seems to know exactly what gbolduev is saying, hence the lengthy debates and such. Here's a proposal: why don't Gbolduev and all his guinea pigs go live in his hometown where you can be experimented on in his lab, and when there is actual proof of what he's saying you can all report back to this forum! Plus it will double as some good male bonding time. I think it will be special.
He titled it RU,I was going through it more and nothing interesting,get discussion going, the fact you gloat says a lot.
I say straw man and point out the strawman.
Actually, people do understand what he is saying. We have multiple private PM groups going with great results, although it's still early in the process.
What I don't understand is the desire to denigrate people who want to get better. I'm a male in my 20's and have been suffering from PSSD for many years; I've barely had a libido or sex drive throughout my life. I, along with many others in the PSSD/PFS community, have tried everything under the sun. We've listened to users on forums like this who have posted study after study, often with no results. So a guy like @gbolduev comes around and posts a theory that lines up with something we had already been discussing for months in private on the PSSD forum. Why would it not make sense to follow along and give this a try?
The way you worded your post is insulting at best. People have literally committed suicide over this ***t. You should think before you say things like this.
That is like reading the title of a study without actually reading the content in the study which you accused me of doing. Maybe you should actually read the research you are presenting before actually presenting it?