Great quote.When people are locked into their 15 minute smart cities, with their smart appliances and GMO foods, they will finally realise that their inability to oxidize glucose is political.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Great quote.When people are locked into their 15 minute smart cities, with their smart appliances and GMO foods, they will finally realise that their inability to oxidize glucose is political.
There is a thread on shedding remedies. Maybe we need a thread for people who have successfully reversed vaccine injuries.@Peatress
"Agenda 2030 is no small thing."....Especially when one considers they have Agendas 2040, 50, 60, etc, all the way out to 2100...no joke. Overcoming the effects of the covid poisoning will be a monumental task so maybe the forum can be a key resource in the effort to heal as many as possible?
I like your line of thought. Way to go: a peaty chatbot to jumpstart a deeper research.Yes, maybe that can be made possible with a curated chatbot in this forum giving the better answers in order to point them in the right direction.
This would certainly be more than worth the subscription fee as outside the forum it's a veritable jungle of misdirection and misinformation. with Google and all.
But the chatbot should limit itself to health matters, specifically metabolism and Peat-centered, and shy away from political matters, lest it incur the ire of the censors.
Then charlie would have another problem, albeit a better problem, when a long queue forms in the application for membership line.
This would help set us up to use good information to begin with, and it will be easier for each member to connect the dots in unraveling the mystery that is their diseased condition, and to get better.
The chatbot could compile a list of resources buries within the website including, but not limited to RP newsletters, books, articles, interviews, and the works of scientist often cited such as Szent-Gyorgi, Warburg, Ling, Koch, Metchnikoff.
A member would have enough material to embark on a deep dive for his own particular context, and emerge more knowledgeable, and become more useful as a poster that adds value to threads. The quality of the forum improves with more knowledgeable members.
---____________---
Could someone call Elon for a turnkey Chatbot server system? Tell him he gets a free lifetime membership to go along with it. And free advice from us all.
We're getting good vibes.I like your line of thought. Way to go: a peaty chatbot to jumpstart a deeper research.
Maybe having all Peat's newsletters as a dataset for such a chatbot is a good start?
If these are dreams, they sure feel like vivid dreams!I know, I can be a bore when I get ahead of myself.
Slap me. I must be dreaming.
Yes, maybe that can be made possible with a curated chatbot in this forum giving the better answers in order to point them in the right direction.
This would certainly be more than worth the subscription fee as outside the forum it's a veritable jungle of misdirection and misinformation. with Google and all.
But the chatbot should limit itself to health matters, specifically metabolism and Peat-centered, and shy away from political matters, lest it incur the ire of the censors.
Then charlie would have another problem, albeit a better problem, when a long queue forms in the application for membership line.
This would help set us up to use good information to begin with, and it will be easier for each member to connect the dots in unraveling the mystery that is their diseased condition, and to get better.
The chatbot could compile a list of resources buries within the website including, but not limited to RP newsletters, books, articles, interviews, and the works of scientist often cited such as Szent-Gyorgi, Warburg, Ling, Koch, Metchnikoff.
A member would have enough material to embark on a deep dive for his own particular context, and emerge more knowledgeable, and become more useful as a poster that adds value to threads. The quality of the forum improves with more knowledgeable members.
---____________---
Could someone call Elon for a turnkey Chatbot server system? Tell him he gets a free lifetime membership to go along with it. And free advice from us all.
Are you kidding? THIS is how the old forum operated. Members like you taking a topic and doing a deep dive on aspects, factors, and possibilities. Then, thinking out loud, unafraid to hear dissent or discussion, or debate. The crisis of the world today is that 95% of humans cannot rub a few words together for a coherent sentence. You are giving us all ideas we can collectively approach, contribute to, and perhaps give Charlie a well-thought out avenue of application to consider. I remain grateful for your willingness to present these ideas.I know, I can be a bore when I get ahead of myself.
Slap me. I must be dreaming.
YOU GO GIRL - not just the forum but the USA in general was once free to speak.Are you kidding? THIS is how the old forum operated. Members like you taking a topic and doing a deep dive on aspects, factors, and possibilities. Then, thinking out loud, unafraid to hear dissent or discussion, or debate. The crisis of the world today is that 95% of humans cannot rub a few words together for a coherent sentence. You are giving us all ideas we can collectively approach, contribute to, and perhaps give Charlie a well-thought out avenue of application to consider. I remain grateful for your willingness to present these ideas.
Grazie. (Curtseys)YOU GO GIRL - not just the forum but the USA in general was once free to speak.
Charlie has a lot of work to do, He is always thinking.
Just a suggestion because I have looked up things here---Sayer Ji accumulated decades of data (in many forms) and arrived at GreenMedInfo. I wonder if that could be reviewed for modeling purposes?I'm actually looking into doing this. I'm looking for the most cost effective option, but it's not technically too hard with a lot of ray's writing being available digitally, OpenAI's API and/or the current supply of solid open source language models. The open source tooling in this space is advancing so quickly. It just might be expensive to train and host depending upon much use it gets.
I was also thinking about a separate forum based one that indexes all the posts, but this would be much more expensive given the higher quantity of text.
If anyone would be interested in chipping in let me know. I have a lot on my plate at the moment but I'm going to estimate how much it would cost using different options, with OpenAI being the best (most likely).
We're building a field of dreams!If these are dreams, they sure feel like vivid dreams!
I am interested to get @charlie 's general feedback, as the forum owner. Charlie, do you think such a chatbot is feasible for the forum and is a good thing to have?
Glad to hear you've done some groundwork, at least in your mind. How mature is OpenAI? Is it at the level of v1 already? I've really not kept up much with this field and I'm asking only out of ignorance.I'm actually looking into doing this. I'm looking for the most cost effective option, but it's not technically too hard with a lot of ray's writing being available digitally, OpenAI's API and/or the current supply of solid open source language models. The open source tooling in this space is advancing so quickly. It just might be expensive to train and host depending upon much use it gets.
A separate forum seems unnecessary, and it would be dilutive member-wise. A chatbot within this site would enhance and attract membership.I was also thinking about a separate forum based one that indexes all the posts, but this would be much more expensive given the higher quantity of text.
Let us know. It would be very helpful to know. I'm just thinking out loud. Probably build best of class reliability is tops hardware-wise. Opensource with a good team behind it, with good track record in other earlier projects, barebones functionality that suit minimum reqt's for satisfactory performance. It is assumed that the ability to input text information would come easy from the existing repositories (such as of @Eth 's). Text-based data would be enough to begin with.If anyone would be interested in chipping in let me know. I have a lot on my plate at the moment but I'm going to estimate how much it would cost using different options, with OpenAI being the best (most likely).
Thanks again for the support. Anything we can do to support Charlie and in that way ourselves as well.Are you kidding? THIS is how the old forum operated. Members like you taking a topic and doing a deep dive on aspects, factors, and possibilities. Then, thinking out loud, unafraid to hear dissent or discussion, or debate. The crisis of the world today is that 95% of humans cannot rub a few words together for a coherent sentence. You are giving us all ideas we can collectively approach, contribute to, and perhaps give Charlie a well-thought out avenue of application to consider. I remain grateful for your willingness to present these ideas.
I am already working with a programmer but do not want to get into the specifics right now.I am interested to get @charlie 's general feedback, as the forum owner. Charlie, do you think such a chatbot is feasible for the forum and is a good thing to have?
Privately training and hosting something based on an "open" model like LLaMA is going to be cost prohibitive for "free" (ad funded or otherwise) public use where a reasonable response time's expected. A subscription model could work but continually tracking its use, making projections and rescaling it would be tricky to say the least. For private use it's absolutely possible on a PC with a decent GPU or a cluster of them, depending on energy costs and how many coffees you can tolerate making or series episodes you can tolerate watching while you train, refine and wait for outputs.The open source tooling in this space is advancing so quickly. It just might be expensive to train and host depending upon much use it gets.
Using mine for now would be sufficient, although once I get all the interviews transcribed then it would be as close as we could get.Let us know. It would be very helpful to know. I'm just thinking out loud. Probably build best of class reliability is tops hardware-wise. Opensource with a good team behind it, with good track record in other earlier projects, barebones functionality that suit minimum reqt's for satisfactory performance. It is assumed that the ability to input text information would come easy from the existing repositories (such as of @Eth 's). Text-based data would be enough to begin with.
Very cool with some money to burn.Just to let y'all know, one of my pals over at Chadnet has already make a pseudo-peat chatbot, you can play around with it at peatbot.com. It's pretty fun to mess around with, of course it's not perfect because all it does is source the context it refers to from the small source of information in the articles, but it still does a somewhat decent job. I think he sourced the context from either mine or chadnet's directory (wouldn't make a big difference regardless). Like I said, once I get all the interviews transcribed then it will be much more accurate.
Oh damn. What a line.When people are locked into their 15 minute smart cities, with their smart appliances and GMO foods, they will finally realise that their inability to oxidize glucose is political.
Awesome, thanks for this! Really saves time scrolling through newsletters when youre just looking for certain info or remindersUsing mine for now would be sufficient, although once I get all the interviews transcribed then it would be as close as we could get.
Just to let y'all know, one of my pals over at Chadnet has already make a pseudo-peat chatbot, you can play around with it at peatbot.com. It's pretty fun to mess around with, of course it's not perfect because all it does is source the context it refers to from the small source of information in the articles, but it still does a somewhat decent job. I think he sourced the context from either mine or chadnet's directory (wouldn't make a big difference regardless). Like I said, once I get all the interviews transcribed then it will be much more accurate.