Possible Confirmation Of The Electric Universe Theory (EUT) In The Lab

Discussion in 'Scientific Studies' started by haidut, Nov 16, 2017.

  1. haidut

    haidut Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Messages:
    17,206
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA / Europe
    This study is not exactly the kind of confirmation sufficient for EUT to get mainstream acceptance, however I thought the coincidence in its findings is rather unusual...and thus not a coincidence at all. Carl Jung said long time ago that there are no coincidences and similar patterns we see in seemingly unrelated events are examples of the so-called synchronicity - i.e. a strong sign that the the observed patterns are a legitimate physical phenomenon driven by the same laws. The creativity training movement for the 1960s known as Synectics, which Peat wrote about, held the same view.
    This study found that placing a specific fluid/gas object in superconductive fluid containing an electric field forces the matter to form into a shape that is uncannily similar to the planet Saturn. I suppose the electrically charged ether (as described by EUT) would play the role of the superconductive fluid and electrical field, in which the droplet was submerged in the study. The study goes on to say that when the drop is immersed in a more electrically conductive fluid than the droplet itself, the magnetic poles flatten and the droplet (planet) start to look like an M&M candy - flat at the poles and bulging at the equator. For the record, that is exactly how our planet Earth looks like and also most other planets in our solar system. This is the reason the point on the surface of the Earth farthest from the center of the planet is not mount Everest but mount Chimborazo (Chimborazo - Wikipedia) in the Andes. Since the Earth bulges out at closer to the equator, smaller peaks (Chimborazo) closer to the equator could end up being more distant from the planet center than taller peaks (Everest) further away from the equator.
    I suppose the reason our Earth and other gas planets like Jupiter do not look like Saturn (yet) is due to a smaller difference between the conductivity of those planets and the ether in which they all bathe.
    Hey @pimpnamedraypeat - any thoughts/comments on this?

    Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 034501 (2017) - Streaming from the Equator of a Drop in an External Electric Field
    Electrified Droplets Create Mini Saturn Planets

    "...By electrifying tiny drops of fluid, scientists have created miniature versions of the ringed planet Saturn. Though gorgeous to look at, the resulting "planet" has more than aesthetic value: The achievement could help lead to new ways of generating microscopic and uniform particles and capsules often used in products such as drugs, inks, cosmetics, paints and ceramics, researchers said. When a drop of electrically conductive liquid is exposed to an electric field, the droplet responds by forming two electrically charged poles."

    "...These new findings reveal that when a drop is less electrically conductive than its surroundings, its poles take on an electric charge that is the same as the electrodes (the electrified plates). Since like repels like, "the repulsion between the electrodes and the poles squashes the drop into [an] M&M-like shape," Vlahovska told Live Science."

    "...If an electric field is strong enough, the researchers found that the equators of these squashed drops emit concentric rings of droplets, making the drops look like miniature versions of Saturn. In experiments, drops of silicone oil about 1 millimeter wide generated droplets that were about 100 times smaller, Vlahovska said. "I was surprised by the fact that rings detached from the drop — I was not expecting it all," Vlahovska said."
     
  2. Insaneacinamide

    Insaneacinamide Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2016
    Messages:
    154
    Pantera knew this back in 2000
     
  3. CrystalClear

    CrystalClear Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    104
    Gender:
    Female
    They have a high incidence of correct predictions, in contrast to NASA scientists who are always scratching their heads and surprised at what they see probes sending back.
     
  4. Kartoffel

    Kartoffel Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2017
    Messages:
    1,199
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks for posting this!
     
  5. pimpnamedraypeat

    pimpnamedraypeat Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,045
    Gender:
    Male
    I was still subscribed to the theory that it was the centrifugal force from Earths spin that caused it to be wider along the equator.

    Interesting

    Speaking of silicone, new research suggests that silicone is the "missing element" at the earths solid inner core.

    https://phys.org/news/2017-01-silicon-element-earth-core.html

    [​IMG]

    Another study from the same group claimed that as the core slowly cooled, this silicon reacted with oxygen (also found in the core) to form quartz crystals, which supposedly held power the geomagnetic field

    Crystallization of silicon dioxide and compositional evolution of the Earth's core. - PubMed - NCBI

    The lead scientist describes it as a forest of crystals, all pointing to the north pole.



    Interesting because seismological research had shown that the earths outer inner core (yellow) had anisotripic properties, i.e it displayed different properties at different directions. seismic waves traveled faster north to sound and slower east to west.

    [​IMG]

    They put it down to iron crystals but with this new finding maybe its quartz? Or perhaps it's both who knows.

    Something else I was reading said that the core spins faster than the earth (not sure how gravity explains that one) and they had this moneyshot at the end

    Core Spins Faster Than Earth, Lamont Scientists Find

    Amazing isn't it? Rotating crystals at the earths core. I know I went offtopic but it's what I was focused on at the moment. But when everything from geology to seismology points to electric universe then there's really no doubt. There's only pain-faced denial.
     
  6. steel_reserve

    steel_reserve Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2016
    Messages:
    89
    Gender:
    Male
    What inventions are possible if EUT is true? How do I get rich from the coverup of EUT?

    If EUT is to be accepted by the mainstream, the rubber has to meet the road. Electronic universe theory has to become electronic universe fact.
     
  7. DrJ

    DrJ Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2015
    Messages:
    434
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Arizona
    Probably new forms of space propulsion. Solar system level or galactic level circuit creation and hacking. If gravity turns out to be an electric phenomenon - basically a dipole field due to small but inherent charge separation - then gravity reducing or anti-gravity technology. Maybe new forms of semi-terrestrial power generation.
     
  8. Waynish

    Waynish Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2016
    Messages:
    1,652
    Gender:
    Male
    Newer generations of DPF devices ;)
     
  9. sladerunner69

    sladerunner69 Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2013
    Messages:
    3,159
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Econ Student
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    how would you hypothesize an anti-gravity field be generated in the case that gravity is a mere electric phenomenon?
     
  10. DrJ

    DrJ Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2015
    Messages:
    434
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Arizona
    @sladerunner69 Not sure if you would call it a field, but the aim would be to neutralize or reduce the net dipole. Scrambling the dipoles, or perhaps using a strong field to align the dipoles and then use the greater dipole to "push" the object away with another field. Anything you can do to manipulate charges and fields would be valid. Maybe there could be a gravity faraday cage.
     
  11. Broken man

    Broken man Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2016
    Messages:
    1,355
    Gender:
    Male
    Did somebody read C. G. Jung book about synchronicity?
     
Loading...