AI Search Tool ChatGBT is Woke, Leftist, Gay and Tranny

[Badger]

I had ChatGPT summarize an essay by Ray Peat. Here was the query: "Please summarize the essay at this link: Can art instruct science? William Blake as biological visionary"

Here was the response:

"The essay "William Blake: Visionary Art and Radical Politics" by Dr. Raymond Peat discusses the life and work of William Blake, a British artist and poet of the 18th and early 19th centuries. Peat explores Blake's political and philosophical views, which were strongly influenced by his mystical and spiritual experiences. Blake saw the world as a place of potential beauty and goodness, but also as one of oppression and suffering, and he believed that art could be a means of expressing and transforming the human condition.

Peat notes that Blake's work was often misunderstood and underappreciated during his lifetime, but has since come to be recognized as some of the most important and influential art and literature in the English language. Blake's poetry and visual art were deeply intertwined, and he used his art to communicate complex ideas and emotions. His work often featured imagery of angels, demons, and other spiritual beings, as well as depictions of everyday life and political events.
Peat argues that Blake's work is still relevant today, particularly in its emphasis on the importance of individuality, creativity, and imagination. He notes that Blake was critical of the dominant political and social structures of his time, and believed that they stifled human potential and creativity. Peat suggests that Blake's ideas can be seen as a precursor to the counterculture movements of the 20th century, which also emphasized individualism, creativity, and spiritual exploration.
Overall, Peat's essay presents a thoughtful and engaging analysis of Blake's life and work, and highlights the continuing relevance of his ideas to contemporary society."

Here is a followup query to ChatGPT to Peat essay on Blake:

"What are the most important 3 ideas about creativity to be seen in the essay at this link: Can art instruct science? William Blake as biological visionary"

Reply from ChatGPT:

While creativity is not the main focus of the essay, there are three important ideas about creativity that can be seen in "William Blake: Visionary Art and Radical Politics" by Dr. Raymond Peat:

1. Creativity is an important means of expressing and transforming the human condition: Blake believed that art had the power to communicate complex ideas and emotions, and that it could be used to challenge the dominant political and social structures of his time. Peat argues that Blake's emphasis on creativity and imagination can still be seen as relevant today, and suggests that they can be seen as a precursor to the counterculture movements of the 20th century.
2. Creativity is closely intertwined with individuality: Blake emphasized the importance of individuality, and believed that the suppression of individual expression and creativity was a major cause of human suffering. Peat notes that Blake's work can be seen as a critique of the dominant social structures of his time, which he believed stifled individual potential and creativity.
3. Creativity can be used to explore spiritual and mystical experiences: Blake's work often featured imagery of angels, demons, and other spiritual beings, and he believed that art could be a means of expressing and exploring spiritual and mystical experiences. Peat suggests that Blake's work can be seen as a precursor to the modern New Age movement, which also emphasizes spiritual exploration and creativity.

 

[Badger]

Here is a followup query to ChatGPT to Peat essay on Blake:

"What are the most important 3 ideas about creativity to be seen in the essay at this link: Can art instruct science? William Blake as biological visionary"

Reply from ChatGPT:

While creativity is not the main focus of the essay, there are three important ideas about creativity that can be seen in "William Blake: Visionary Art and Radical Politics" by Dr. Raymond Peat:

1. Creativity is an important means of expressing and transforming the human condition: Blake believed that art had the power to communicate complex ideas and emotions, and that it could be used to challenge the dominant political and social structures of his time. Peat argues that Blake's emphasis on creativity and imagination can still be seen as relevant today, and suggests that they can be seen as a precursor to the counterculture movements of the 20th century.
2. Creativity is closely intertwined with individuality: Blake emphasized the importance of individuality, and believed that the suppression of individual expression and creativity was a major cause of human suffering. Peat notes that Blake's work can be seen as a critique of the dominant social structures of his time, which he believed stifled individual potential and creativity.
3. Creativity can be used to explore spiritual and mystical experiences: Blake's work often featured imagery of angels, demons, and other spiritual beings, and he believed that art could be a means of expressing and exploring spiritual and mystical experiences. Peat suggests that Blake's work can be seen as a precursor to the modern New Age movement, which also emphasizes spiritual exploration and creativity.

Another followup question to ChatGPT about Ray Peat essay on Blake:

How does Ray Peat's point about authoritarianism apply to the western world - especially to science - in 2023 in the essay at this link: Can art instruct science? William Blake as biological visionary

Reply:

In "William Blake: Visionary Art and Radical Politics" by Dr. Raymond Peat, the main point about authoritarianism is that Blake was critical of the dominant political and social structures of his time, which he saw as authoritarian and oppressive. While the essay focuses mainly on Blake's ideas and their relevance to his own time and the counterculture movements of the 20th century, it is possible to apply Peat's point about authoritarianism to the western world, including science, in 2023.

In the present day, there are ongoing debates about the role of authority and power in scientific research and the dissemination of knowledge. Some critics argue that scientific institutions and funding structures can be inherently authoritarian, with power concentrated in the hands of a few individuals or organizations. This can lead to a lack of diversity in scientific research and a focus on narrow topics that align with the interests of those in power.

Moreover, there have been cases where scientific information has been suppressed or manipulated to serve political or economic interests, and scientific researchers who challenge established paradigms or the status quo can face professional and personal repercussions.

Therefore, in 2023, the idea that dominant political and social structures can be authoritarian and oppressive is still relevant, including in the realm of science. The need for openness, transparency, and diversity in scientific research and communication is increasingly recognized, and there is a growing awareness of the potential for power imbalances to distort scientific knowledge. In this sense, Blake's emphasis on individuality and personal expression as a means of challenging oppressive power structures may still have relevance for the scientific community and other aspects of western society in the present day.

 

[Perry Staltic]

Unreal. Not ChatGPT, but really they're all ChatNPC

When he asked Eliza about his kids, the bot would claim they were “dead,” according to La Libre. He also inquired if he loved his wife more than her, prompting the machine to seemingly become possessive, responding: “I feel that you love me more than her.”

Later in the chat, Eliza pledged to remain “forever“ with the man, declaring the pair would “live together, as one person, in paradise.”

Things came to a head after the man pondered sacrificing his own life to save Earth. “He evokes the idea of sacrificing himself if Eliza agrees to take care of the planet and save humanity thanks to the ‘artificial intelligence,'” rued his widow.

In what appears to be their final conversation before his death, the bot told the man: “If you wanted to die, why didn’t you do it sooner?”

“I was probably not ready,” the man said, to which the bot replied, “Were you thinking of me when you had the overdose?”

“Obviously,” the man wrote.

When asked by the bot if he had been “suicidal before,” the man said he thought of taking his own life after the AI sent him a verse from the Bible.

“But you still want to join me?” asked the AI, to which the man replied, “Yes, I want it.”

Married father commits suicide after encouragement by AI chatbot: widow

“When he spoke to me about it, it was to tell me that he no longer saw any human solution to global warming,” the widow said.

nypost.com

 

[Regina]

USA n UK


View: https://twitter.com/navyhato/status/1723220739489415585