Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Some of us need more of it in our bodies. Another one or two hundred parts per million in the atmosphere makes little difference to that. But it can make a big difference to the stability of various habitats in the biosphere.we need more CO2 not less
+1We need to preserve the forests and jungles, this fooling around is embarrassing.
You're right a a few more hundred parts per million and plants will begin to function again closer to their normal evolutionary levels. Many plants cant survive below 150 ppm and we were heading that way. Luckily the drop in CO2 levels has reversed, perhaps due to the evil burning of fossil fuels. Propaganda not withstanding.Some of us need more of it in our bodies. Another one or two hundred parts per million in the atmosphere makes little difference to that. But it can make a big difference to the stability of various habitats in the biosphere.
We're well over double that now and rising.Many plants cant survive below 150 ppm and we were heading that way.
yes that's what the mainstream media and bought off scientists will tell you. Fortunately none of it is true. Severe weather is not increasing, leaf cover over the planet is increasing, and the ice is growing thicker in Antarctica. Oh and there are more polar bears alive today than in the last 30 years. hmm I thought they were all going to starve.We're well over double that now and rising.
I'm sure you can find some places where some plants will thrive from some effect of climate change.
Last I looked, though, hurricanes, floods, erosion, and especially droughts, heatwaves, wildfires and desertification aren't doing the flora in quite a few places much good. When the glaciers are gone, there will be more areas deprived of the water they've depended on for a long time.
https://www.independent.co.uk/envir...nge-growth-global-warming-sahel-a8280361.html
And the people who ave lived and travelled in the affected areas.yes that's what the mainstream media and bought off scientists will tell you.
whatever areas you are speaking about they are not due to man made CO2. Temperatures and sea levels have been rising since the mini ice age in the 18th century, well before the industrial revolution. Climate has always changed, whether we like it or not.And the people who ave lived and travelled in the affected areas.
Guess I'm inclined to give weight to the scientists who have done extensive research on it. Yes climate has always changed; a chunk of the recent change is shown to be caused by human activity. (CO2 is just one of the significant GHGs, and not the whole of the story.)whatever areas you are speaking about they are not due to man made CO2.
Guess I'm inclined to give weight to the scientists who have done extensive research on it. Yes climate has always changed; a chunk of the recent change is shown to be caused by human activity. (CO2 is just one of the significant GHGs, and not the whole of the story.)
There are people focusing on smog too. Not everyone can do everything. If smog is your thing to tackle, go for it.What surprises me the most is why the focus is always on CO2 when there are so many other legitimate toxins in the air that need to be gotten rid of. Why not focus on smog for example.