General Orange
Member
..."high intakes of fructose (set at ≥ 25 % of total energy) was shown to lead to metabolic complications such as dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance and increased visceral adiposity, based on several review articles( 47 , 53 – 56 )." This would be 187 gram of table sugar (3k cal. daily intake)
[edit]
"...There has been no evidence that relatively high levels of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) consumption could be associated with obesity, diabetes or cardiometabolic risk in professional athletes who usually consume SSB as energy and dehydration drinks. On the other hand, there is evidence that physical inactivity, even within a few days, causes insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia in normal healthy individuals( 105 ). In this regard, two randomised within-subjects studies in healthy males and females showed that higher plasma TAG concentrations, induced by a high-carbohydrate diet, were completely prevented by physical activity( 106 , 107 ). Thus, the metabolic consequences of a high mixed glucose–fructose intake can be significantly modulated by exercise. In a narrative review( 108 ), it was reported that high fructose consumption induces insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinaemia, hypertriacylglycerolaemia and hypertension in animal models."
"...The data in human subjects, however, were considered less clear. In this respect, fructose consumption, even in large amounts (17 % of total energy), did not result in significant effects in healthy males but did cause these effects in healthy women( 109 ). Moreover, such fructose consumption did not stimulate de novo lipogenesis in premenopausal women( 110 , 111 )Again, it was underlined that experiments in human subjects have produced very conflicting results, as there is only limited evidence from human consumption data, using fructose levels of higher than 15 % of daily energy intake, for such an effect on insulin sensitivity."
EDIT 2 - After checking the reference the article is confusing male for females in bold.
So then we could max the daily fructose intake to 15 % of total energy:
75 gram - 2k cal.
94 gram - 2.5k cal.
or 150g - 188g table sugar
[edit]
"...There has been no evidence that relatively high levels of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) consumption could be associated with obesity, diabetes or cardiometabolic risk in professional athletes who usually consume SSB as energy and dehydration drinks. On the other hand, there is evidence that physical inactivity, even within a few days, causes insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia in normal healthy individuals( 105 ). In this regard, two randomised within-subjects studies in healthy males and females showed that higher plasma TAG concentrations, induced by a high-carbohydrate diet, were completely prevented by physical activity( 106 , 107 ). Thus, the metabolic consequences of a high mixed glucose–fructose intake can be significantly modulated by exercise. In a narrative review( 108 ), it was reported that high fructose consumption induces insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinaemia, hypertriacylglycerolaemia and hypertension in animal models."
"...The data in human subjects, however, were considered less clear. In this respect, fructose consumption, even in large amounts (17 % of total energy), did not result in significant effects in healthy males but did cause these effects in healthy women( 109 ). Moreover, such fructose consumption did not stimulate de novo lipogenesis in premenopausal women( 110 , 111 )Again, it was underlined that experiments in human subjects have produced very conflicting results, as there is only limited evidence from human consumption data, using fructose levels of higher than 15 % of daily energy intake, for such an effect on insulin sensitivity."
EDIT 2 - After checking the reference the article is confusing male for females in bold.
So then we could max the daily fructose intake to 15 % of total energy:
75 gram - 2k cal.
94 gram - 2.5k cal.
or 150g - 188g table sugar
Last edited: