Connecticut Published Ingredients of Moderna Vaccine - SM-102 secret ingredient is a poison

[Lollipop2]

Yet more bad news for these injections. The title says it all:

UPDATED 8:21 AM WEDNESDAY -- Connecticut Publishes Moderna COVID Vax Ingredients: DEADLY POISON "SM-102 - Not for Human or Veterinary Use"

The Connecticut Department of Public Health has published the Ingredients list for the Moderna COVID

halturnerradioshow.com

 

[Lollipop2]

@Nemo

 

[mm33]

Wow, thanks Lollipop2 for finding this and posting!

 

[Nemo]

@Nemo

I've been afraid to read it. How bad is it?

Update:

The Moderna vax contains the chemical SM-102. "According to the manufacturer, Cayman Chemical Company, in their filing with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), this chemical causes 'Acute Toxicity.'" It is "fatal in contact with skin."

In that same OSHA filing, the manufacturer says SM-102 "causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure."

More fun: It's suspected of causing cancer. Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child. Causes damage to the central nervous system, kidneys, liver and repiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure.

And it's very toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects.

It's the third most prevalent ingredient in the vax. It looks like it's part of the nanoparticle coating, with polyethylene glycol.

So it sounds very good for your health.

The usual suspects are already out there gaslighting about this.

You will be glad to know the vax doesn't contain eggs or latex. Can't have anything as dangerous as eggs in the vax.

 

[Lollipop2]

I've been afraid to read it. How bad is it?

Not fit for human or veterinary use starts the article...what?!?! What are they trying to accomplish?

 

[Lollipop2]

Wow, thanks Lollipop2 for finding this and posting!

Funny enough, I called my Mom to say hi and SHE told me about it. I was pleased. I have been sending her all kinds of articles and she loved them and wanted to be able to share with me. She did! Something I hadn’t heard about.

 

[Nemo]

Not fit for human or veterinary use starts the article...what?!?! What are they trying to accomplish?

The spike protein mRNA in their vax doesn't actually initiate a T cell response in animal studies. All it does is embed spike protein throughout your vascular system.

p. 8: View of Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19

So this is their adjuvant. They're poisoning you to try to initiate a T cell response.

But since their EUA application failed to contain data on antibody titers or T cell data, and only asserted efficacy through use of PCR tests (reduced cycles), we know that even with the poison they failed to initiate a T cell response.

So you get poisoned, but still have no immunity to Covid-19 disease.

 

[Lollipop2]

The spike protein mRNA in their vax doesn't actually initiate a T cell response in animal studies. All it does is embed spike protein throughout your vascular system.

p. 8: View of Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19

So this is their adjuvant. They're poisoning you to try to initiate a T cell response.

But since their EUA application failed to contain data on antibody titers or T cell data, and only asserted efficacy through use of PCR tests (reduced cycles), we know that even with the poison they failed to initiate a T cell response.

So you get poisoned, but still have no immunity to Covid-19 disease.

In the article update it described how they actually did animal trials with the Moderna vax and they all died so they by passed and went straight to human trials. Here is the quote:

“Moreover, the biologist they quote failed to disclose that most of the animals studied with the Moderna vaccine . . . DIED from it during the animal testing studies and that so many animals died, they sought, and were granted, a WAIVER to stop the animal studies and go directly to experimental human use. Apparently, we humans are now the study creatures for this so-called "vaccine" which may be why over four thousand people have died in the USA after taking the Moderna vaccine. We stand-by the accuracy of this story.”

 

[Lejeboca]

Not fit for human or veterinary use starts the article...what?!?! What are they trying to accomplish?

Well, the "danger" in Cayman's SM-102 mixture, is chloroform. From their data sheet

I haven't seen chloroform listed as one of the Moderna's ingredients, thanks God.
Although SM-102 is not good either, since this is a nano-particle lipid (LNP), it is actually saturated (!) lipid to my surprise... As this screenshot taken from (PDF) mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: Structure and stability shows:

It seems that saturated LNPs deliver the payload (an RNA) to the cells better than unsaturated ones even though the latter are more easily "fused" with the cell as the following paper shows
Cationic lipid saturation influences intracellular delivery of encapsulated nucleic acids .

 

[Lollipop2]

Well, the "danger" in Cayman's SM-102 mixture, is chloroform. From their data sheet
View attachment 23628

I haven't seen chloroform listed as one of the Moderna's ingredients, thanks God.
Although SM-102 is not good either, since this is a nano-particle lipid (LNP), it is actually saturated (!) lipid to my surprise... As this screenshot taken from (PDF) mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: Structure and stability shows:

View attachment 23629
It seems that saturated LNPs deliver the payload (an RNA) to the cells better than unsaturated ones even though the latter are more easily "fused" with the cell as the following paper shows
Cationic lipid saturation influences intracellular delivery of encapsulated nucleic acids .

He apparently had people contacting him about this. He explains in his first update:


UPDATE MAY 18 12:30 PM EDT --

I am getting a lot of emails from biochemists telling me that the evil data about SM-102 has to do with the fact that it is delivered via a solution of Chloroform and the hazards listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) deal with Chloroform. No, they don't.

The MSDS deals with the substance SM-102 as it is manufactured by Cayman Chemical Company. Period.

The ingredients list in the Moderna COVID 'Vaccine" lists SM-102 as the third most-prevalent ingredient in the vaccine, and that ingredient is as the Cayman Chemical Company describes it. It's that simple.

But this actually gets worse.

Chloroform is the solution used with the SM-102 and Chloroform has been outlawed for use by consumers for decades.

The reason Chloroform is outlawed for use by consumers has to do with how long it stays in a human body and what it does to a human body while it's inside. The Half-Life of Chloroform is 180 days. That means that it takes half a YEAR for only HALF of the chloroform, to be exited out of the body. You with me so far?

Chloroform, like any other chemical, breaks down. And when it comes into contact with oxygen, it breaks down into . . . . wait for it . . . . Phosgene Gas.

Phosgene gas is fatal to humans in concentrations as low as seven parts per million (7ppm).

So all these folks getting the "jab" might be getting Chloroform which, as it circulates through their bodies can break down into phosgene gas.

Depending upon the unique functions of various people, some -- maybe many -- of those people MIGHT reach the fatal threshold of phosgene gas in their system, and die from it; likely within 180 days after the second "jab."

But wait, there's even MORE! Phosgene is a highly toxic substance that exists as a gas at room temperature. Owing to its poor water solubility, one of the hallmarks of phosgene toxicity is an unpredictable asymptomatic latent phase before the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Yes, the lungs fill with fluid and the patient can't breathe. Just like . . . . wait for it . . . . "COVID."

 

[Lejeboca]

He apparently had people contacting him about this. He explains in his first update:


UPDATE MAY 18 12:30 PM EDT --

I am getting a lot of emails from biochemists telling me that the evil data about SM-102 has to do with the fact that it is delivered via a solution of Chloroform and the hazards listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) deal with Chloroform. No, they don't.

The MSDS deals with the substance SM-102 as it is manufactured by Cayman Chemical Company. Period.

The ingredients list in the Moderna COVID 'Vaccine" lists SM-102 as the third most-prevalent ingredient in the vaccine, and that ingredient is as the Cayman Chemical Company describes it. It's that simple.

But this actually gets worse.

Chloroform is the solution used with the SM-102 and Chloroform has been outlawed for use by consumers for decades.

The reason Chloroform is outlawed for use by consumers has to do with how long it stays in a human body and what it does to a human body while it's inside. The Half-Life of Chloroform is 180 days. That means that it takes half a YEAR for only HALF of the chloroform, to be exited out of the body. You with me so far?

Chloroform, like any other chemical, breaks down. And when it comes into contact with oxygen, it breaks down into . . . . wait for it . . . . Phosgene Gas.

Phosgene gas is fatal to humans in concentrations as low as seven parts per million (7ppm).

So all these folks getting the "jab" might be getting Chloroform which, as it circulates through their bodies can break down into phosgene gas.

Depending upon the unique functions of various people, some -- maybe many -- of those people MIGHT reach the fatal threshold of phosgene gas in their system, and die from it; likely within 180 days after the second "jab."

But wait, there's even MORE! Phosgene is a highly toxic substance that exists as a gas at room temperature. Owing to its poor water solubility, one of the hallmarks of phosgene toxicity is an unpredictable asymptomatic latent phase before the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Yes, the lungs fill with fluid and the patient can't breathe. Just like . . . . wait for it . . . . "COVID."

I've looked at 3-4 papers and all of them state that SM-102 is Moderna's proprietary compound.
Moderna also has a patent on a solid (crystalline) form of SM-102 (Compound 2) in the screenshot below. Hence, I assume that they are using SM-102 per their own patent and not from a third party vendor.

 

[PowertothePeatple]

It gets even worse than any of those. SM-102 is also what they use to deliver Luciferase. Luciferase is a compound used to create bioluminescence. So is there Luciferase in the vaccine? They say there isn't but I wonder since it does contain SM-102. It would make a convenient way to know who has been vaccinated.

 

[cjm]

So this is their adjuvant. They're poisoning you to try to initiate a T cell response.

So you get poisoned, but still have no immunity to Covid-19 disease.

This is morbidly funny.

 

[Lollipop2]

I've looked at 3-4 papers and all of them state that SM-102 is Moderna's proprietary compound.
Moderna also has a patent on a solid (crystalline) form of SM-102 (Compound 2) in the screenshot below. Hence, I assume that they are using SM-102 per their own patent and not from a third party vendor.

View attachment 23630

Interesting @Lejeboca. Makes sense it is their own compound.

 

[schultz]

Cationic lipid nano particles are quite inflammatory and probably cause damage all on their own. It would definitely be acting as an adjuvant, even if it wasn't intended as such.

I am unaware of how the lipid acts once in cells. Is it cleared quickly? Does it interact with proteins and metals? Does it interact with fats inside the body? It's possible it could cause lipid peroxidation or form lipofuscin-like materials and interact with iron causing oxidation. If the body has trouble removing it it could cause on-going low grade inflammation (in the brain for example).

People argue with me about the vaccines. Apparently I am a science denier or something. I questioned the vaccine ingredients and someone asked me where I got my medical degree... Oh yah, I forgot they learn about lipid nanoparticles in med. School! I'm guessing most doctors in the world don't know exactly what these LNP's are. There isn't a lot of data on them if you search on PubMed. Even Ray admitted he couldn't find much information on then. So I think I'll pass on injecting them into my system. Yes, I am a science denier lol.

 

[Lollipop2]

Cationic lipid nano particles are quite inflammatory and probably cause damage all on their own. It would definitely be acting as an adjuvant, even if it wasn't intended as such.

I am unaware of how the lipid acts once in cells. Is it cleared quickly? Does it interact with proteins and metals? Does it interact with fats inside the body? It's possible it could cause lipid peroxidation or form lipofuscin-like materials and interact with iron causing oxidation. If the body has trouble removing it it could cause on-going low grade inflammation (in the brain for example).

People argue with me about the vaccines. Apparently I am a science denier or something. I questioned the vaccine ingredients and someone asked me where I got my medical degree... Oh yah, I forgot they learn about lipid nanoparticles in med. School! I'm guessing most doctors in the world don't know exactly what these LNP's are. There isn't a lot of data on them if you search on PubMed. Even Ray admitted he couldn't find much information on then. So I think I'll pass on injecting them into my system. Yes, I am a science denier lol.

Precisely. Your breakdown of the unknowns about the lipid nano particles is the line of questioning that everyone should be asking their doctor or the person injecting them before allowing the foreign substance in their body. Seems you are smarter than doctors Mr. Schultz Let us bring it as smart science deniers!

 

[JudiBlueHen]

I've looked at 3-4 papers and all of them state that SM-102 is Moderna's proprietary compound.
Moderna also has a patent on a solid (crystalline) form of SM-102 (Compound 2) in the screenshot below. Hence, I assume that they are using SM-102 per their own patent and not from a third party vendor.

View attachment 23630

Does anyone find it interesting that this patent was PUBLISHED APRIL 30, 2020 and the application date was SEPTEMBER 13, 2019???????
Such foresight! Almost like they knew what was coming...

 

[schultz]

Precisely. Your breakdown of the unknowns about the lipid nano particles is the line of questioning that everyone should be asking their doctor or the person injecting them before allowing the foreign substance in their body. Seems you are smarter than doctors Mr. Schultz Let us bring it as smart science deniers!

I wish there was more information. People don't realize that it can be very difficult to fully study something. We barely know everything that aspirin does and it has been around for over 100 years and is one of the most studied medicines. It wasn't even until the early 70's that we even found out that aspirin inhibits prostaglandin.

Anyway, this paper doesn't go into too much detail but its conclusion does give a bit of an overview (basically what we already knew though). I wonder if mitochondrial damage would increase cancer risk? Of course this paper is not specifically studying SM-102, but a different cationic lipid nanoparticle (DOTAP I think).

The in vivo toxicological profile of cationic solid lipid nanoparticles - PubMed

Cationic solid lipid nanoparticles (cSLNs) are considered as one of the most effective lipid nanocarriers for delivery of low water-solubility compounds and genetic materials. As the excipients used in the cSLN production are generally regarded as safe (GRAS), the formulations are granted as...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

In summary, this study provides evidence that cSLNs induce transient toxic effects in the blood with signs of acute inflammation in the reticuloendothelial cell–containing organs. The transient inflammation should not be neglected; it could have an important implication in the therapeutic use of cSLNs, not only from the negative perspective, but also transient inflammation could be desired in some therapeutic application (e.g.,as a vaccine adjuvant). However exploratory, this study provides some insight into the underlying mechanism of cSLN in vivo toxicity, providing compelling evidence that can be useful for the pharmaceutical field and in regulatory toxicology. Preclinical animal studies are a necessary step for reliable translation of findings from animals to humans. Further efforts are required to identifying the mechanisms underlying cSLNs and cell/biological system interactions.

The molecular nature of these interactions could compromise cell membrane integrity, triggering mitochondrial and lysosomes damage, and increasing the number of autophagosomes. Although much attention has been paid to the development of cSLNs for drug and gene delivery, little is known about its toxicological interaction to living organisms.

 

[cjm]

Does anyone find it interesting that this patent was PUBLISHED APRIL 30, 2020 and the application date was SEPTEMBER 13, 2019???????
Such foresight! Almost like they knew what was coming...

This is where the real story is! Have you watched the follow-up to the Plandemic documentary? It's all about the money trail, the patent trail.

Start at 28:38 for David E Martin's "rabbit trail," his investigation of the Corona-industrial complex:

(Coronavirus itself was patented by the CDC in 2003, for example. But it's so insidious, the Corona complex owns all the patents, e.g., the virus, the vaccine, the detection methods, etc.)


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/dWF23h1nk2nm/

 

[Lejeboca]

Does anyone find it interesting that this patent was PUBLISHED APRIL 30, 2020 and the application date was SEPTEMBER 13, 2019???????
Such foresight! Almost like they knew what was coming...

Yeah, the pharma has worked on the mRNA vaccines delivery for maybe 10 years already. So I am not surprised with the pre-scamdemic patent applications. What's tickles is that it has been approved :just in time" on april 30 2020.