This link says a lot of bad things about non-raw milk, even that pasteurization inhibits the majority of calcium and phosphorus found in raw milk.
http://www.realmilk.com/health/raw-milk ... ized-milk/
Probably pasteurization’s worst offence is that it makes insoluable the major part of the calcium contained in raw milk. This frequently leads to rickets, bad teeth, and nervous troubles, for sufficient calcium content is vital to children; and with the loss of phosphorus also associated with calcium, bone and breain formation suffer serious setbacks.
My milk says in 1 cup (regardless of fat %) it contains 30% calcium, is all that calcium just "inhibited" and worthless? Nutritiondata.self.com for milk (skim or low fat) says milk (in general) has 30% calcium, 25% phosphorus and overall VERY nutritious. Is it just wrong because pasteurization has degraded the milk?
http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/dai ... ucts/139/2
Is it true pasteurization is so bad or is it just propoganda against non-raw milk? Ray Peat never specifies we have to drink raw milk and in fact says 1% is best, even says he doesn't drink milk with added Vitamin A because it gives him issues. Why would Ray Peat recommend "changing milk brands if one ives you allergies" if pasteurization degrades the milk according to realmilk.com? Please tell me that site is lie.
http://www.realmilk.com/health/raw-milk ... ized-milk/
Probably pasteurization’s worst offence is that it makes insoluable the major part of the calcium contained in raw milk. This frequently leads to rickets, bad teeth, and nervous troubles, for sufficient calcium content is vital to children; and with the loss of phosphorus also associated with calcium, bone and breain formation suffer serious setbacks.
My milk says in 1 cup (regardless of fat %) it contains 30% calcium, is all that calcium just "inhibited" and worthless? Nutritiondata.self.com for milk (skim or low fat) says milk (in general) has 30% calcium, 25% phosphorus and overall VERY nutritious. Is it just wrong because pasteurization has degraded the milk?
http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/dai ... ucts/139/2
Is it true pasteurization is so bad or is it just propoganda against non-raw milk? Ray Peat never specifies we have to drink raw milk and in fact says 1% is best, even says he doesn't drink milk with added Vitamin A because it gives him issues. Why would Ray Peat recommend "changing milk brands if one ives you allergies" if pasteurization degrades the milk according to realmilk.com? Please tell me that site is lie.