Drareg
Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 4,772
Danny Roddy and @haidut recently discussed this on Friday nights chat.
It’s an intelligent response to attempt forgery in this instance, they are clearly psychotic and want to use this "immunity" passport to achieve a mandatory global sign up to digital identity.
Whether or not you believe this tech can be useful is not really the question, it’s who’s behind it that can’t be trusted.
In saying all that, is life really that complicated with paper birth certificates and paper passports?
But think of all the undocumented the ruling class say, it’s humanitarian to have bio ID’s, evil dictators take their papers etc (ironically using weapons the elite sell them),of course in the Epstein esque ruling class cliques I’m sure the kids he trafficked will never have their digital identities wiped or anything like that.......
It’s likely Microsoft will store all the "government stored" blockchain info IMO, this means Israel will have direct access to your information, I doubt anything will be open source knowing Bill Epstein Gates’ s form, if Israel have it this means China and Russia will automatically have it too.
"Immunity license" is the new language, the term license means pay a tax and also mitigates the nuance of potential accusations of discrimination, for example you can’t drive a car without a "license", get it?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10916-020-01616-4?fbclid=IwAR164c_2kVwq8nlT3vbunWhT-npjMrlDiVBH2JvmFc0iTsbetEs80C6F7UA
In an effort to lift the social distancing measures, some countries including Chile, Germany, the UK and others have suggested the use of COVID-19 “immunity passports” or “immunity certificates” or “immunity licenses” i.e. document that certify an individual has been infected and is immune to coronavirus disease 2019 [1]. Individuals with immunity certificates could be exempt from physical restrictions and could return to work, school and other daily activities. However, there are various practical and legal challenges [2,3,4] in adequate implementation of “immunity certificates.” The use of immunity licenses would create a restriction on who can and cannot participate in social and work-related activities and this would encourage forgery and incentivize people to seek infection. Herein, we propose a blockchain technology [5, 6] to combat two challenges while using immunity certificates, falsification of information and people seeking out for COVID-19 infection.
Citizens register on a government run blockchain which would maintain and verify the COVID 19 related data. Testing facilities and hospitals are also required to be on the blockchain network so that all the reports are automatically uploaded on the distributed ledger and cannot be modified later. When an individual takes the COVID-19 antibody test, the details are kept confidential using smart contracts. Smart contracts swap the public key of the individual with an anonymous key which is received by health care workers. Once the sample is tested, the smart contract is able to tag the anonymous key with the actual public key of the individual. If the test confirms that the person has developed antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, a token is issued in the account of that person with expiry date according to the expected age of antibodies. This means that the tokens can be verified only until a particular time frame. This blockchain takes biometric authentication as a private key so as to prevent people using each other’s blockchain account. Since every person’s data is encrypted with their biometrics, privacy and anonymity is maintained. This system cannot be used to extract any information of the individual but only to verify the claims of a person. Another advantage is the ease of verification, since it is a public digital ledger run by the government, it provides quick and trusted verification across borders. Just like bitcoin, everyone can see how much a particular wallet owns, the person just needs to prove the ownership of that wallet. This can be achieved simply by sending a message from your account to the person who is verifying the claim. It could be made more robust if the laboratory and hospital devices are IoT (Internet of things) enabled so that they are able to work directly with the blockchain without any human intervention. Smart contracts make it extremely easy to verify if any of the devices have been tempered with or not.
Utilizing blockchain can mitigate the falsification of test reports and encourage people to come in contact with individuals having immunity-based licenses rather than actively seeking for COVID 19 infection. This blockchain based system also offers an opportunity to prioritize individuals for antibody testing via contact tracing. However, the major concern while implementing this blockchain system is that there is currently not enough evidence that people with antibodies are protected from having a second COVID 19 infection [7, 8]. Thus, contact with individuals possessing immunity certificates might increase the risk of infection. There exists a challenge of social division between the licensed and unlicensed people [9]. Therefore, in conclusion, we believe that the above mentioned blockchain system would mitigate some of the challenges existing with the current implementation of “immunity certificates” or “immunity licenses.”
It’s an intelligent response to attempt forgery in this instance, they are clearly psychotic and want to use this "immunity" passport to achieve a mandatory global sign up to digital identity.
Whether or not you believe this tech can be useful is not really the question, it’s who’s behind it that can’t be trusted.
In saying all that, is life really that complicated with paper birth certificates and paper passports?
But think of all the undocumented the ruling class say, it’s humanitarian to have bio ID’s, evil dictators take their papers etc (ironically using weapons the elite sell them),of course in the Epstein esque ruling class cliques I’m sure the kids he trafficked will never have their digital identities wiped or anything like that.......
It’s likely Microsoft will store all the "government stored" blockchain info IMO, this means Israel will have direct access to your information, I doubt anything will be open source knowing Bill Epstein Gates’ s form, if Israel have it this means China and Russia will automatically have it too.
"Immunity license" is the new language, the term license means pay a tax and also mitigates the nuance of potential accusations of discrimination, for example you can’t drive a car without a "license", get it?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10916-020-01616-4?fbclid=IwAR164c_2kVwq8nlT3vbunWhT-npjMrlDiVBH2JvmFc0iTsbetEs80C6F7UA
In an effort to lift the social distancing measures, some countries including Chile, Germany, the UK and others have suggested the use of COVID-19 “immunity passports” or “immunity certificates” or “immunity licenses” i.e. document that certify an individual has been infected and is immune to coronavirus disease 2019 [1]. Individuals with immunity certificates could be exempt from physical restrictions and could return to work, school and other daily activities. However, there are various practical and legal challenges [2,3,4] in adequate implementation of “immunity certificates.” The use of immunity licenses would create a restriction on who can and cannot participate in social and work-related activities and this would encourage forgery and incentivize people to seek infection. Herein, we propose a blockchain technology [5, 6] to combat two challenges while using immunity certificates, falsification of information and people seeking out for COVID-19 infection.
Citizens register on a government run blockchain which would maintain and verify the COVID 19 related data. Testing facilities and hospitals are also required to be on the blockchain network so that all the reports are automatically uploaded on the distributed ledger and cannot be modified later. When an individual takes the COVID-19 antibody test, the details are kept confidential using smart contracts. Smart contracts swap the public key of the individual with an anonymous key which is received by health care workers. Once the sample is tested, the smart contract is able to tag the anonymous key with the actual public key of the individual. If the test confirms that the person has developed antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, a token is issued in the account of that person with expiry date according to the expected age of antibodies. This means that the tokens can be verified only until a particular time frame. This blockchain takes biometric authentication as a private key so as to prevent people using each other’s blockchain account. Since every person’s data is encrypted with their biometrics, privacy and anonymity is maintained. This system cannot be used to extract any information of the individual but only to verify the claims of a person. Another advantage is the ease of verification, since it is a public digital ledger run by the government, it provides quick and trusted verification across borders. Just like bitcoin, everyone can see how much a particular wallet owns, the person just needs to prove the ownership of that wallet. This can be achieved simply by sending a message from your account to the person who is verifying the claim. It could be made more robust if the laboratory and hospital devices are IoT (Internet of things) enabled so that they are able to work directly with the blockchain without any human intervention. Smart contracts make it extremely easy to verify if any of the devices have been tempered with or not.
Utilizing blockchain can mitigate the falsification of test reports and encourage people to come in contact with individuals having immunity-based licenses rather than actively seeking for COVID 19 infection. This blockchain based system also offers an opportunity to prioritize individuals for antibody testing via contact tracing. However, the major concern while implementing this blockchain system is that there is currently not enough evidence that people with antibodies are protected from having a second COVID 19 infection [7, 8]. Thus, contact with individuals possessing immunity certificates might increase the risk of infection. There exists a challenge of social division between the licensed and unlicensed people [9]. Therefore, in conclusion, we believe that the above mentioned blockchain system would mitigate some of the challenges existing with the current implementation of “immunity certificates” or “immunity licenses.”