Hugh Johnson
Member
I think you are misreading the study. Table 4 is the people they follow on miscarriage etc. You are probably mixing up the number and referring to the people who were followed only on immediate reactions.One more thing just to hammer this home -- let's try to estimate how many first and second-trimester vaccinations that 827 includes.
827 total completed
700 successful (implying completed) pregnancies in women who took the vaccine in the third trimester
So we're looking at at most 127 completed pregnancies that were vaccinated before the third trimester.
92 + 1132 + 1714 = 2938 pregnancies vaccinated before third trimester
So we're only looking at at most 127/2938 = 4% of the relevant pregnancies here. The rest are still gestating, and they are relevant. Do you think it seems wise to make assumptions about 2938 pregnancies based on these 127 completions? It's probably fine for our purposes if it's a random sample, but it's not a random sample! Pregnancies that end early are more likely to be included in the dataset than pregnancies that end on time.
Edit: formatting