Nitrates In Tap Water May Cause 12,500+ Cancer Cases Annually

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
Despite the billions of dollars poured into advertising by municipal water authorities trying to convince people, the evidence for the negative effects of drinking such water just keeps piling on. Fluoride has been added for decades, despite the constant stream of research demonstrating its ill effects.
Fluoride At Levels In Tap Water Is As Toxic As Lead And Mercury For The Brain
Fluoride Exposure (in Utero) Lowers IQ
Fluoride In Tap Water Could Be A Causative Factor In Diabetes
Fluoride Now Officially Banned In India As A Known Toxin
Fluoride In Tap Water Is One Likely Cause Of Hypothyroidism

And if fluoride in tap water and all of its ill effects was not enough of a concern, we now have another good reason to skip the tap water. Namely, nitrates. The same nitrates that are such a health concern in produce and are heavily regulated by USDA, but only when it comes to produce.
Dietary Nitrates Can Cause Mania After Just Two Weeks Of Consumption
Dietary Nitrate / Nitrite Acutely Inhibits Metabolism
Nitrates / Nitrites Inhibit Androgen Synthesis By Raising NO

As the study below shows, nitrates in levels less than 1/10 of what is considered completely acceptable by the USDA/EPA/FDA are capable of increasing risk of cancer. While the mechanism of action of nitrates' carcinogenicity is officially labelled as "unknown" their role as a primary dietary precursor to nitric oxide (NO) is probably the main culprit. But given the love affair FDA and drug companies have with NO and its boosters like Viagra, do not expect the tide on NO (or nitrates for that reason) to reverse any time soon. As the study said, EPA already suspended its plans to revise the outdated standards for nitrate levels in tap water.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393511930218X?via=ihub
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-06/ewg-enp060519.php

"...Nitrate pollution of U.S. drinking water may cause up to 12,594 cases of cancer a year, according to a new peer-reviewed study by the Environmental Working Group. For the groundbreaking study, published today in the journal Environmental Research, EWG scientists estimated the number of cancer cases in each state that could be attributed to nitrate contamination of public water systems, largely caused by farm runoff containing fertilizer and manure. They also estimated the costs of treating those cases at up to $1.5 billion a year.

"...Nitrate contamination of drinking water is a serious problem, and especially severe in the nation's farm country," said Olga Naidenko, Ph.D., EWG senior science advisor and one of the study's authors. "Now, for the first time, we can see the staggering consequences of this pollution." The current federal drinking water standard for nitrate, set in 1962, is 10 parts per million, or ppm. Yet several well-regarded epidemiological studies have linked nitrate in drinking water with cancer and other serious health issues at levels less than one-tenth of the legal limit. Earlier this year, the Environmental Protection Agency suspended plans to reevaluate its outdated nitrate standard.

"...Four-fifths of EWG's estimated cases were occurences of colorectal cancer, with ovarian, thyroid, kidney and bladder cancer making up the rest. Nitrate in tap water has also been linked with serious neonatal health issues. EWG estimated that nitrate pollution may be responsible for as many as 2,939 cases of very low birth weight; 1,725 cases of very preterm birth; and 41 cases of neural tube defects. "Millions of Americans are being involuntarily exposed to nitrate, and they are also the ones paying the heavy costs of treating contaminated tap water," said Alexis Temkin, Ph.D., a toxicologist at EWG and primary author of the study. "But the federal government is not doing enough to protect Americans from tap water contamination. EWG scientists estimate the level at which there would occur no adverse health effects from nitrate in drinking water to be 0.14 milligrams per liter - equivalent to parts per million. That level, 70 times lower than the EPA's legal limit, represents a one-in-one-million risk of cancer."
 

ShotTrue

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2019
Messages
692
Everyone needs to filter their water! Just got a Berkey with flouride filter
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
10,523
Thank you @haidut

I use the Berkey. You have to get the fluoride filter which is the “black filter” and an add-on, and it needs to be routinely changed, more often than the other filter.

It has aluminum in it, which always bothered me. There is an alternative media, bone char. I wonder why this wouldn’t have a lot of lead and other heavy metals concentrated in the animal bones?
 

accelerator

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
177
Despite the billions of dollars poured into advertising by municipal water authorities trying to convince people, the evidence for the negative effects of drinking such water just keeps piling on. Fluoride has been added for decades, despite the constant stream of research demonstrating its ill effects.
Fluoride At Levels In Tap Water Is As Toxic As Lead And Mercury For The Brain
Fluoride Exposure (in Utero) Lowers IQ
Fluoride In Tap Water Could Be A Causative Factor In Diabetes
Fluoride Now Officially Banned In India As A Known Toxin
Fluoride In Tap Water Is One Likely Cause Of Hypothyroidism

And if fluoride in tap water and all of its ill effects was not enough of a concern, we now have another good reason to skip the tap water. Namely, nitrates. The same nitrates that are such a health concern in produce and are heavily regulated by USDA, but only when it comes to produce.
Dietary Nitrates Can Cause Mania After Just Two Weeks Of Consumption
Dietary Nitrate / Nitrite Acutely Inhibits Metabolism
Nitrates / Nitrites Inhibit Androgen Synthesis By Raising NO

As the study below shows, nitrates in levels less than 1/10 of what is considered completely acceptable by the USDA/EPA/FDA are capable of increasing risk of cancer. While the mechanism of action of nitrates' carcinogenicity is officially labelled as "unknown" their role as a primary dietary precursor to nitric oxide (NO) is probably the main culprit. But given the love affair FDA and drug companies have with NO and its boosters like Viagra, do not expect the tide on NO (or nitrates for that reason) to reverse any time soon. As the study said, EPA already suspended its plans to revise the outdated standards for nitrate levels in tap water.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393511930218X?via=ihub
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-06/ewg-enp060519.php

"...Nitrate pollution of U.S. drinking water may cause up to 12,594 cases of cancer a year, according to a new peer-reviewed study by the Environmental Working Group. For the groundbreaking study, published today in the journal Environmental Research, EWG scientists estimated the number of cancer cases in each state that could be attributed to nitrate contamination of public water systems, largely caused by farm runoff containing fertilizer and manure. They also estimated the costs of treating those cases at up to $1.5 billion a year.

"...Nitrate contamination of drinking water is a serious problem, and especially severe in the nation's farm country," said Olga Naidenko, Ph.D., EWG senior science advisor and one of the study's authors. "Now, for the first time, we can see the staggering consequences of this pollution." The current federal drinking water standard for nitrate, set in 1962, is 10 parts per million, or ppm. Yet several well-regarded epidemiological studies have linked nitrate in drinking water with cancer and other serious health issues at levels less than one-tenth of the legal limit. Earlier this year, the Environmental Protection Agency suspended plans to reevaluate its outdated nitrate standard.

"...Four-fifths of EWG's estimated cases were occurences of colorectal cancer, with ovarian, thyroid, kidney and bladder cancer making up the rest. Nitrate in tap water has also been linked with serious neonatal health issues. EWG estimated that nitrate pollution may be responsible for as many as 2,939 cases of very low birth weight; 1,725 cases of very preterm birth; and 41 cases of neural tube defects. "Millions of Americans are being involuntarily exposed to nitrate, and they are also the ones paying the heavy costs of treating contaminated tap water," said Alexis Temkin, Ph.D., a toxicologist at EWG and primary author of the study. "But the federal government is not doing enough to protect Americans from tap water contamination. EWG scientists estimate the level at which there would occur no adverse health effects from nitrate in drinking water to be 0.14 milligrams per liter - equivalent to parts per million. That level, 70 times lower than the EPA's legal limit, represents a one-in-one-million risk of cancer."

What do you think is the best way to address this? reverse osmosis?
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
What do you think is the best way to address this? reverse osmosis?

I think calcium opposes fluoride at the cellular level. Chloride may too, so increasing salt intake may also help. As far as filtering, the reverse osmosis should work and I think Peat mentioned some other methods. If you Google for "fluoride filter" on the forum the threads should come up.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom