TruffleGnocchi
Member
Would it be good to expand the Wiki page, maybe a separate wiki, with disclaimer that says the content might not reflect Ray Peat's views, that its coming from RPF members?
This forum almost has a wiki structure, because of all the topics that can be posted on. But I think it might be valuable if there were wiki or wiki-like pages. For example: RP doesnt talk much about Taurine, L-Theanine, Peptides, TRT, methylene blue, quinine, etc. Or even things Ray talks about but people could still make a dedicated page for it.
For example, Glycine. Someone could create a page and write something about it, maybe add the dosages they used, the effects, and put the sources for the content. Then someone else could correct it if the studies were misinterpreted or if there is another better study that disproved the previous study. Collectively over time I think it might turn into something great.
Could have amino-acid section, with pages for each amino acid, carotenoid section, estrogens with different estrogens, protocols, theories, different androgenic steroids.
Like the regular wikipedia but RPF created and maintained based on RPF community's views, with evidence or some logic at least.
First someone could create a page that would be totally off from what is true, but over time after many contributions and corrections it would get increasingly better.
I know anyone here can just create a post under the respective topic, but people can only add comments, and edit their posts for a brief time after posting. And the posts just pile up over time, many repeating what has been discussed before. Then it becomes too much to read if one would want to not miss anything that has been said about a topic. I think wiki-like pages that everyone can correct with admin's review or something, it could be good. If someone suggests a correction, an unbiased-as-possible admin could review the correction that has been suggested, and then deciding based on the source (science paper or logic) of the correction if it gets accepted and modifies the wiki page or not.
A separate wiki or clearly separated section from Ray Peat's words, an RPF member's wiki section. So there would not be confusion of what is RP ideas and what might not be.
For start, copying what is on wikipedia or other wikis, then adding to or correcting that with better studies or something like that.
If someone wants to know about the opinion of RPF people on supplementing vitamin B2, or Taurine, or Creatine, they could go to the wiki first and see what is the thing that is accepted as currently valid information on that topic and why, potentially the dosages, the source links, photos of molecules, maybe list of sources for buying the compound if it is a page about a compound that can be bought. Instead of typing vitamin B2 and scrolling endlessly through the posts and then reading a few, a few off-topic that happen to mention B2. Or instead of making a new post with basically the same question that has already been answered, somewhere.
This forum almost has a wiki structure, because of all the topics that can be posted on. But I think it might be valuable if there were wiki or wiki-like pages. For example: RP doesnt talk much about Taurine, L-Theanine, Peptides, TRT, methylene blue, quinine, etc. Or even things Ray talks about but people could still make a dedicated page for it.
For example, Glycine. Someone could create a page and write something about it, maybe add the dosages they used, the effects, and put the sources for the content. Then someone else could correct it if the studies were misinterpreted or if there is another better study that disproved the previous study. Collectively over time I think it might turn into something great.
Could have amino-acid section, with pages for each amino acid, carotenoid section, estrogens with different estrogens, protocols, theories, different androgenic steroids.
Like the regular wikipedia but RPF created and maintained based on RPF community's views, with evidence or some logic at least.
First someone could create a page that would be totally off from what is true, but over time after many contributions and corrections it would get increasingly better.
I know anyone here can just create a post under the respective topic, but people can only add comments, and edit their posts for a brief time after posting. And the posts just pile up over time, many repeating what has been discussed before. Then it becomes too much to read if one would want to not miss anything that has been said about a topic. I think wiki-like pages that everyone can correct with admin's review or something, it could be good. If someone suggests a correction, an unbiased-as-possible admin could review the correction that has been suggested, and then deciding based on the source (science paper or logic) of the correction if it gets accepted and modifies the wiki page or not.
A separate wiki or clearly separated section from Ray Peat's words, an RPF member's wiki section. So there would not be confusion of what is RP ideas and what might not be.
For start, copying what is on wikipedia or other wikis, then adding to or correcting that with better studies or something like that.
If someone wants to know about the opinion of RPF people on supplementing vitamin B2, or Taurine, or Creatine, they could go to the wiki first and see what is the thing that is accepted as currently valid information on that topic and why, potentially the dosages, the source links, photos of molecules, maybe list of sources for buying the compound if it is a page about a compound that can be bought. Instead of typing vitamin B2 and scrolling endlessly through the posts and then reading a few, a few off-topic that happen to mention B2. Or instead of making a new post with basically the same question that has already been answered, somewhere.