WSJ: Omicron Makes Biden’s Vaccine Mandates Obsolete

[haidut]

I did not expect to see mainstream media publish such openly anti-mandate piece, especially with Luc Motagnier as one of the authors, but there it is. Maybe momentum is indeed building up for this to madness to stop, or at least get delayed somewhat before a new "crisis" is manufactured...
@Drareg @Regina @tankasnowgod @yerrag @Giraffe

Opinion | Omicron Makes Biden’s Vaccine Mandates Obsolete

There is no evidence so far that vaccines are reducing infections from the fast-spreading variant.

www.wsj.com

Omicron makes Biden's vaccination mission obsolete - Thehiu

Federal courts reviewing the Biden administration's vaccination mandates - including the Supreme Court at Friday's debate - have focused on administrative-law

thehiu.com

"...Federal courts reviewing the Biden administration’s vaccination mandates – including the Supreme Court at Friday’s debate – have focused on administrative-law issues. The ordinances also raise constitutional issues. But there is a simpler reason judges should stay these mandates: the emergence of the Omicron variant. It would be absurd, legally unacceptable, and contrary to the public interest to mandate the use of vaccines by the government without any evidence that vaccines are effective in preventing prevent the spread of pathogens they target. However, that is exactly what is happening here."

"...U.S. law axioms that courts fail to follow an agency’s directive when the agency completely fails to consider facts material to the matter. In many contexts, courts return regulations to the agency for review in the event that circumstances change dramatically. If the agency’s action is “unsustainable in the case itself, the appropriate judicial approach is to ignore the action and refer the matter back to the agency for further review,” as the U.S. Court of Appeals said. United States for the District of Columbia launched. it. Neither HHS nor OSHA ever reviewed Omicron or said a word about the effectiveness of a vaccine against it, for the simple reason that it has yet to be discovered. In these cases, age-old legal principles require judges to uphold the duties and send them back to the agencies for a fresh look."

 

[Surfari]

I did not expect to see mainstream media publish such openly anti-mandate piece, especially with Luc Motagnier as one of the authors, but there it is. Maybe momentum is indeed building up for this to madness to stop, or at least get delayed somewhat before a new "crisis" is manufactured...
@Drareg @Regina @tankasnowgod @yerrag @Giraffe

Opinion | Omicron Makes Biden’s Vaccine Mandates Obsolete

There is no evidence so far that vaccines are reducing infections from the fast-spreading variant.

www.wsj.com

Omicron makes Biden's vaccination mission obsolete - Thehiu

Federal courts reviewing the Biden administration's vaccination mandates - including the Supreme Court at Friday's debate - have focused on administrative-law

thehiu.com

"...Federal courts reviewing the Biden administration’s vaccination mandates – including the Supreme Court at Friday’s debate – have focused on administrative-law issues. The ordinances also raise constitutional issues. But there is a simpler reason judges should uphold these mandates: the emergence of the Omicron variant. It would be absurd, legally unacceptable, and contrary to the public interest to mandate the use of vaccines by the government without any evidence that vaccines are effective in preventing prevent the spread of pathogens they target. However, that is exactly what is happening here."

"...U.S. law axioms that courts fail to follow an agency’s directive when the agency completely fails to consider facts material to the matter. In many contexts, courts return regulations to the agency for review in the event that circumstances change dramatically. If the agency’s action is “unsustainable in the case itself, the appropriate judicial approach is to ignore the action and refer the matter back to the agency for further review,” as the U.S. Court of Appeals said. United States for the District of Columbia launched. it. Neither HHS nor OSHA ever reviewed Omicron or said a word about the effectiveness of a vaccine against it, for the simple reason that it has yet to be discovered. In these cases, age-old legal principles require judges to uphold the duties and send them back to the agencies for a fresh look."

Typo from the thehiu.com site on that third sentence - they used the word 'uphold' but the wsj.com site uses the word 'stay'
So that third sentence should say:
But there’s a simpler reason the justices should stay these mandates: the rise of the Omicron variant.

 

[jdrop]

The headlines and language that have now been authorized, vary greatly from last week... Questioning has been permitted, for the moment. Let's see how they write the next phase...

 

[daveoutside]

This still plays into the idea that breathing humans are now considered dangerous.... won't change the narrative.

 

[Drareg]

I did not expect to see mainstream media publish such openly anti-mandate piece, especially with Luc Motagnier as one of the authors, but there it is. Maybe momentum is indeed building up for this to madness to stop, or at least get delayed somewhat before a new "crisis" is manufactured...
@Drareg @Regina @tankasnowgod @yerrag @Giraffe

Opinion | Omicron Makes Biden’s Vaccine Mandates Obsolete

There is no evidence so far that vaccines are reducing infections from the fast-spreading variant.

www.wsj.com

Omicron makes Biden's vaccination mission obsolete - Thehiu

Federal courts reviewing the Biden administration's vaccination mandates - including the Supreme Court at Friday's debate - have focused on administrative-law

thehiu.com

"...Federal courts reviewing the Biden administration’s vaccination mandates – including the Supreme Court at Friday’s debate – have focused on administrative-law issues. The ordinances also raise constitutional issues. But there is a simpler reason judges should uphold these mandates: the emergence of the Omicron variant. It would be absurd, legally unacceptable, and contrary to the public interest to mandate the use of vaccines by the government without any evidence that vaccines are effective in preventing prevent the spread of pathogens they target. However, that is exactly what is happening here."

"...U.S. law axioms that courts fail to follow an agency’s directive when the agency completely fails to consider facts material to the matter. In many contexts, courts return regulations to the agency for review in the event that circumstances change dramatically. If the agency’s action is “unsustainable in the case itself, the appropriate judicial approach is to ignore the action and refer the matter back to the agency for further review,” as the U.S. Court of Appeals said. United States for the District of Columbia launched. it. Neither HHS nor OSHA ever reviewed Omicron or said a word about the effectiveness of a vaccine against it, for the simple reason that it has yet to be discovered. In these cases, age-old legal principles require judges to uphold the duties and send them back to the agencies for a fresh look."

Meanwhile in Europe they are attempting Biden’s strategy as we speak, this lots lockstep is becoming a drunken stumble.

 

[TheCalciumCad]

Theres a narrative shift happening alright.


View: https://twitter.com/Telegraph/status/1480496590049755141

 

[Nfinkelstein]

I did not expect to see mainstream media publish such openly anti-mandate piece, especially with Luc Motagnier as one of the authors, but there it is.

Most strange indeed. A bit encouraging maybe. But --- disappointing in the sense that they are saying "Hey you know, maybe The Science doesn't support vaccinating against omicron" when in reality they should be saying "Hey you know, regardless of what The Science says, maybe the federal government has no business forcing vaccinations in the first place"

 

[Giraffe]

The Prime Minister of Spain announced that they want to change the strategy. They want to deal with covid in a similar way they deal with influenza.

The article ends with "furthermore the lethality of the virus has decreased from 13% in the first wave of the pandemic to 1% now."

Sánchez plantea evaluar el covid como una gripe y controlará el precio de los antígenos

El presidente asegura que hay que sopesar el tratar la enfermedad como endémica y que se comprarán 344.000 pastillas antivirales a Pfizer en eneroConsulta aquí la parte política de la entrevista: sus palabras sobre la reforma laboral y la polémica de la carne de Alberto Garzón

www.elperiodico.com

 

[tankasnowgod]

I did not expect to see mainstream media publish such openly anti-mandate piece, especially with Luc Motagnier as one of the authors, but there it is.

What weird times, when you wouldn't expect to see a major newspaper publish an opinion piece about health from someone who won the Nobel Prize in Medicine. But yeah, you really can't expect something like this nowadays.

The Wall Street Journal has been one of the few papers that did indeed publish at least some criticism of this entire pandemic narrative pretty much from the beginning. Fox News was one of the few other places you could hear critical opinions.

Though it could indeed be a "narrative shift," I don't know if Montagnier has had this big a platform yet. Over the past week, I have heard Fully (or, at least mostly) demonvaxxed coworkers again saying they are sick of this entire thing, and that is time to just "Let er rip."

 

[Doc Sandoz]

Typo from the thehiu.com site on that third sentence - they used the word 'uphold' but the wsj.com site uses the word 'stay'
So that third sentence should say:
But there’s a simpler reason the justices should stay these mandates: the rise of the Omicron variant.

Hit the paywall on the WSJ so couldn't access it. That hiu article seemed like a bad translation.

Why would hiu need to translate WSJ English into English? An error so blatant as subbing "uphold" for "stay" turns the entire meaning on its head.

 

[haidut]

Typo from the thehiu.com site on that third sentence - they used the word 'uphold' but the wsj.com site uses the word 'stay'
So that third sentence should say:
But there’s a simpler reason the justices should stay these mandates: the rise of the Omicron variant.

Thanks, I corrected it.

 

[haidut]

The Wall Street Journal has been one of the few papers that did indeed publish at least some criticism of this entire pandemic narrative pretty much from the beginning. Fox News was one of the few other places you could hear critical opinions.

They also ran this article on their front page back in October. Too bad the woke consider WSJ worse than Trump and refuse to read it.

Opinion | Media Ignore Florida Covid Recovery

Journalists credited Gavin Newsom for a similar turnaround but won’t stop vilifying Ron DeSantis.

www.wsj.com

 

[Rafe]

IHME has been projecting since at least August that there would be a small surge in late 2021 but the major trends would all be down: daily deaths, hospital resource use, & daily infections & testing.

But, the data is blank for vaccine uptake. Interesting.

They were projection the epidemiological end to the scamdemic in early 2022.

They have a page on their site that links to major news stories linking back to their site. I’m thinking it couldn’t be hard to adjust variables in a data design to adjust outcomes. But if you skim those news story links you see that the media uses that site to maximize the terror messaging.

IHME has masking & distancing going way up as the scamdemic goes down? That tells a story of control right there.

If the psychology technocrats know nothing about mass formation, then they probably are going to have to act surprised that that will be harder to stop than dialing back on a viral threat.

That won’t be legally over until the countries & WHO rescind the state of emergency. But they can’t do that b/c then the EUA for the vaxxes expires.

I better check the “Now it’s. . .” thread for what the next fear factor will be.

Notice: vax data is missing. Which is strange b/c that masking chart is based on data from Facebook.

IHME | COVID-19 Projections

Explore forecasts of COVID-19 cases, deaths, and hospital resource use.

covid19.healthdata.org

 

[-Luke-]

OffGuardian had a good article about the shifting narrative.

What they REALLY mean by “living with Covid”

Kit Knightly The past few days, even weeks, have seen a definite alteration in the media’s attitude to the Covid “pandemic”. There have been numerous examples of what, if the medi…

off-guardian.org

[...]
It seems “living with the virus” means maintaining the status quo, loosening a few restrictions, but leaving the path clear for new waves of fear porn should the need arise.
[...]
To use an apt metaphor, imagine the “Great Reset” agenda as an invading army, marching through town after town, winning battle after battle and burning as they go.

There comes a point where you have to stop. Your supply lines are pulled taut, your men are tired and numbers dwindling, and the occupied citizens are putting up more and more resistance. Push on now, and your entire campaign could crumble.

What you do in that situation is withdraw to a defensible position and fortify it. You don’t give back the land you’ve taken, or not much of it at least, but you stop pushing forward.

The people whose land you have invaded will be so glad the war is over, so tired of fighting, they’ll be so relieved by the respite before realising how much of their land you’ve taken away. They may even say “let them keep it, as long as they stop attacking us”.

That’s how conquest works, from the days of ancient Rome and beyond. A cycle of aggression followed by fortification.

When we switch from “pandemic” to “endemic”, we won’t be getting our rights back, the vaccine passes and surveillance and the culture of paranoia and fear will remain, but people will be so relieved at the pause in the campaign of fear and propaganda they will stop resisting.

They won’t push back, and the “New Normal” will literally become just that, normal.

 

[Rafe]

OffGuardian had a good article about the shifting narrative.

What they REALLY mean by “living with Covid”

Kit Knightly The past few days, even weeks, have seen a definite alteration in the media’s attitude to the Covid “pandemic”. There have been numerous examples of what, if the medi…

off-guardian.org

That article puts it together.

The default is about to be mask wearing & being afraid to be near people.

It’s time to be strong against mask wearing & seek out being with people. And to step back & get the big picture of the statist boot in focus again.

 

[tankasnowgod]

OffGuardian had a good article about the shifting narrative.

What they REALLY mean by “living with Covid”

Kit Knightly The past few days, even weeks, have seen a definite alteration in the media’s attitude to the Covid “pandemic”. There have been numerous examples of what, if the medi…

off-guardian.org

There comes a point where you have to stop. Your supply lines are pulled taut, your men are tired and numbers dwindling, and the occupied citizens are putting up more and more resistance. Push on now, and your entire campaign could crumble.

What you do in that situation is withdraw to a defensible position and fortify it. You don’t give back the land you’ve taken, or not much of it at least, but you stop pushing forward.

Then why didn't they do this in May of 2020? They've been losing ground ever since.

What you do in that situation is withdraw to a defensible position and fortify it. You don’t give back the land you’ve taken, or not much of it at least, but you stop pushing forward.

I think this better describes the situation (not the guy from Jersey Shore) from June 2021 till now.

When we switch from “pandemic” to “endemic”, we won’t be getting our rights back, the vaccine passes and surveillance and the culture of paranoia and fear will remain, but people will be so relieved at the pause in the campaign of fear and propaganda they will stop resisting.

What "rights" did they take away? As far as the several states go, I can't think of a single one. They didn't attack the rights of the sovereign, as that's incredibly foolish. They simply put restrictions on businesses, and engineered mass compliance from the people. So many sovereigns have already contracted a lot of their "rights" away for benefits and privileges in the prior nine decades to the so called "Pandemic," and don't know how to get out of the contract, or even where to start researching.

I don't think any patriots will "stop resisting." The only people who will be "relieved" are the people that believed COVID propaganda in the first place.

 

[tankasnowgod]

The default is about to be mask wearing & being afraid to be near people.

Um, that's been the "default" since May 2020. And that has been crumbling ever since.

 

[Lord Cola]

The people whose land you have invaded will be so glad the war is over, so tired of fighting, they’ll be so relieved by the respite before realising how much of their land you’ve taken away. They may even say “let them keep it, as long as they stop attacking us”.

I haven't seen anything that suggests that people resisting are tired. The people who promoted the covid narrative must not get away and the people who have been resisting all along understand that.

 

[David90]

@haidut
Maybe this Mandates are going to end. I see it over here in Germany. At the Moment we have Protests (aka Walks) EVERY Day now in the larger Citys. They are trying to ban it now, with the reason that these Protests are againast the ''Infection Protection Act'' and against the ''Right of Assembly''. Even Police are slowly getting more and more aggressive now (i see it in different Videos from the Different Cities). Even in Austria, the Vice-Chancellor has NEARLY (deliberately) drive over a Protester with his Car (there is a Video at the Moment, showing that). But these walks seems to be working, since they got the Pressure againgst the Politicians higher and higher.

Our Politicians are going a bit backwards now on the Corona Politics. Even 2G in Bavaria (Recovered or Vaccinated for Clothing Retailers like H&M, Zara, NewYorker and so forth) got cancelled by our Courts on 30 December in 2021. And our Vaccine Mandate has been Postponed for Months, according to the latest News. Now they are trying to do a Vaccine Mandate (like in Italia) for Everyone Higher then 50 Years Old. Maybe they are trying to do as much collateral damage as possible, knowing that the Mandates are slowly failing and the Pandemic going near the End.

 

[Dean]

Maybe they are trying to create an illusion of objectivity and balance? They have to at least acknowledge the information that is challenging their narrative before they can discredit, dismiss and then go back to disregarding it. Continuing to just stifle and censor it outright can begin to raise suspicions among those just "going along to get along" types.