Zpol
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 929
- Age
- 45
My Mom had to get the so-called Covid "vaccine" or else her clients would no longer allow her to be caretaker for their disabled family members. Her job is to help disabled people with their daily tasks. Her clients can easily find someone else to fulfill this role. It has become the norm in this line of work for clients to make this request so she would be out of a job if she didn't get the gene therapy even if she found a different employer. Her workplace is not mandating this experimental vaccine but they are obligated to only assign "vaccinated" employees to the clients who request this (which is all of them). This doesn't seem legal to me and I suggested she get legal counsel but it's too late, she decided to get the mRNA gene therapy and has already gotten the first shot. My mom is aware that these gene therapies neither prevent infection nor transmission, but the general public does not know this and so they ignorantly make the request their caretaker get it.
Since then, my brother-in-law got his second dose and had a horrible reaction. Additionally, her coworkers who will be getting the second dose soon have all asked for vacation for the week following because they think they will be horribly sick, and many of them will I'm sure. So now she is rethinking her decision and wanting to forgo the second shot. I personally think she can get away with this and still work because she can truthfully say she got 'vaccinated' even though she only got one shot.
My worry is in regards to non-neutralizing anti-bodies and the potential for Antibody-dependent enhancement. If she only gets the first shot; wouldn't that increase the probability of non-neutralizing anti-bodies more so than if she got both shots? If she gets the second dose as well, I would think it would be more likely to create fully-neutralizing anti-bodies and reduce the chance of developing ADE. Obviously, either way she's at a higher risk of developing ADE than no "vaccine" at all, but what's done is done, and I want mitigate the danger as much as possible.
Since then, my brother-in-law got his second dose and had a horrible reaction. Additionally, her coworkers who will be getting the second dose soon have all asked for vacation for the week following because they think they will be horribly sick, and many of them will I'm sure. So now she is rethinking her decision and wanting to forgo the second shot. I personally think she can get away with this and still work because she can truthfully say she got 'vaccinated' even though she only got one shot.
My worry is in regards to non-neutralizing anti-bodies and the potential for Antibody-dependent enhancement. If she only gets the first shot; wouldn't that increase the probability of non-neutralizing anti-bodies more so than if she got both shots? If she gets the second dose as well, I would think it would be more likely to create fully-neutralizing anti-bodies and reduce the chance of developing ADE. Obviously, either way she's at a higher risk of developing ADE than no "vaccine" at all, but what's done is done, and I want mitigate the danger as much as possible.