Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Nutritional rickets: deficiency of vitamin D, calcium, or both?
My opinion is that a high dose may be more than you would find in a food source, and CLO is not a primary food source, it is an extract, per se. However, people may not need high doses of D, simply because it may be misunderstood what our needs are. Is D low in storage form, yet high in active form, are the VDRs blocked and causing problems, is low D a cause or effect (from inflammation or illness)? Jim discusses some of that on his FB group (maybe on the video I didn't get through it yet), and if nothing else, it gives you another perspective on whether we need to orally consume doses of a secosteroid not found naturally in our food supply at that level (sans polar bear liver, or whatever, I know someone will want to mention that). And, eating cod livers or extracting the oil for consumption is not a primary food on most areas of the planet.
Great info and I think its important for ppl to watch, its a common suppliment these days and so dangerous!
Thanks for your post. I'd like to learn more about long-term visceral fat storage. Can you recommend any studies or books on the subject?
Take care, I foolishly gave my backside a nasty burn using my Sperti first time! They are much stronger than they feel.
Are you Matt Blackburn? He has a history of jumping from health trend to health trend, I think he has neuroticism about it. If you go back to his early videos the things he reccomended are now what he recommends against. I don’t think he’s a researcher, has any sort of training, or is particularly smart.
Oh shoot it’s an isolate uvb lamp?
Indeed. Since it's an interview trashing venom D, the guest possibly has slow metabolism, so it could be normalizing the metabolic rate for the audience while shortening the torture. If you increase it further, it becomes an anti-attention-deficit measure because the faster it gets, the less distractions the person can afford. It's also a method for practicing skills: last saturday Diokine played Guitar Hero with a friend, masked James, at maximum speed and after returning to normal they mailed it; they perceived reality in slow motion, thought 'This is easy for me, I must be gifted.', and acted by later pressing the lever for more.
These regulatory compounds [such as poisonoids, venomoids, wateroids (Jammal, 2020)] are far more depleting than repleting, it's conceivable for them to promote intolerance in susceptible people, the dose has to match the condition to not make it worse. If there's no ample dietary support, there's still an opportunity to obtain what's missing by using it as modulator to shape the gut composition towards a cooperating profile (amounts would be small but the supply can be steady), also silencing immunity for resolution that minimizes inflammation (prevention of wastage).
The moments when the person has the least inflammation are appropriate for greater doses, whereas at inflammatory peaks the cautionary approach is preferable. For someone that's constantly on the edge, it requires fine-tuning because any dose can be excessive, there are the inflammatory signals that create a futile cycle. The optimal application times in these cases would be on every instance that safe fermentable carbs are consumed but things start derailing (the basic cofactors are probably needed), discontinuing as soon as the first adversity is detected (amplification of existing issues, drop in temperature, pains, tears, and so on). This should be more effective for weakened people than the occasional lethal doses.
These people's hysterical tones are a disservice:
- RoundUp (Glyphosate) Finally Proven Toxic - It Depletes Glycine
Garrett, Charnathan, Morley and Stephanie are more or less on the same boat. I think that the lack of ponderation in their words is reflected on their problem approach as well, but it's not harmless because on every foolish assertion they delegitimize cases who are struggling and could be examined for an accurate explanation. The situation is akin to false sexual assault accusations. For example, if you encountered someone claiming that's suffering from 'Poison A toxicity' after adopting the same speech as the proponents of the movement, how likely it is that the person is going to be taken seriously? If there's no discouragement right away from the term, after inspection and not detecting anything that was claimed, everything that follows is discredited. Something like 'Retinoid Hypomobilization/Dysregulation/Hyperreactive Syndrome' is much better.
Anyway, one of the justifications against its supplementation is that it's a poison A antagonist, which is needed for ceruloplasmin synthesis. There are those who have a functional 'insufficiency' of poison, perhaps the extra venom is enough to aggravate it, but to use it as justification against venom D supplementation seems one more precipitated conclusion. I've never came across reports of (actual) venom D toxicity where ceruloplasmin became critical. How pure the person has to be for ceruloplasmin to be affected? I don't know if something conclusive has been offered, but from the posts that I read there was nothing concrete, it was insane how dots were connected and the jump to the conclusion.
Thank you Twohandsondeck for your reply and the link. Very kind of you.
I use a SOTA LightWorks, it has red, and every other color if you want it, plus the Nogiers frequencies, of which I do not have much knowledge of for use.
