x-ray peat
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
- Messages
- 2,343
Here is the old Badger we have all come to know; always resorting to insults and personal attacks when challenged, and utterly incapable of maintaining a civil discussion. There isn’t much point continuing, as not only are you prone to temper tantrums, but are obviously incapable of distinguishing real history from the age old propaganda of Jewish ritual sacrifice and other anti-Jewish lies. Your accusing me of being what you are, an anti-Semite, is not exactly unexpected from someone spending so much time studying neo-Nazi propaganda. Goebbels' legacy is alive and well.You reject the findings of an eminent Jewish scholar as drivel, without arguing reasons for it. You reject the findings of another Jewish scholar by accusing him of fomenting hatred, etc., without examining the summary and book's arguments. I get it, I expected it, as you are predictable as the London clock, but, as I said, I'm putting out sources that people can judge for themselves to get a much more balanced picture than the very incomplete and deeply disingenuous one you provide. Addenda: you accuse - without evidence - those who raise questions about Jewish malignity in history and the present (especially in Israel) of being hatemongers, while saying the Catholic Church is really Babylonian religion with hocus pocus magic and sorcery, implying it's a devilish occultist fraternity at the top - and always has been - with your references to the very real problem of pederasty and homosexuality therein. You pour out an unending autistic drumbeat about the evil Jesuits - who you insist insist insist - control ENTIRELY every conspiracy of every conspiratorial group, the masons, the Jews, the whatthehellever. The combined effect of of this effort inevitably shifts hatred and calumny onto Catholics. Psychologists call this projection: accusing your opponents of doing things they don't do of the things the accuser does. You are a Christian but actually, like your theological allies at Chick Publications, you hate certain fellow Christians (Catholics) so much that you don't even consider them to be Christian. Almost identical to radical fundamentalist Muslims in their attitude towards other Muslims who disagree with their understanding of Islam.
But getting back to the Jews, whom you appoint yourself to be a defender of (are you white knighting? or just virtue-signaling? or both?): if I were a Jew, I'd be quite offended by your insistent/ insistent/ insistent claim (while offering no evidence, as usual for you) that Jesuits control the Jews. Jews themselves are just as insistent insistent insistent of being very smart, capable, resourceful, etc., etc. I agree with the Jews regarding their self-evaluation. Nobody "controls" them because if this were true, it would mean somebody out there is a lot more smart, capable, and resourceful than the Jews. In other words, the Jews would have to be stupid, incompetent and lacking resources to allow themselves to be controlled. Hence, you insult the people you pretend to defend, you look down on them, while implicitly elevating to a high and majestic level, the Jesuits, who necessarily have to be super intelligent and and have god-like powers - they would have to have such qualities to control the world as much as you vehemently insist they do. And to those of us who see both the good and bad in Jews, you have the audacity to insult as "anti-semites." You are the real anti-semite, a subtler one.
The rest of what you say is a mix of some truth with the ridiculous and historically false and infested with non-sequiturs to be worth the tedium of commenting on.
Last edited: