OP
extremecheddar
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2014
- Messages
- 201
Has anyone tried uridine?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Derek said:post 109384 PUFA also can sometimes be helpful for keeping blood sugar stable. Maybe try eating a handful of peanuts or almonds in between meals and see how that works for you.
Derek said:post 109704 I am not actively encouraging nuts or PUFA.
Yes, I agree.Derek said:post 109694 Ray has said to eat to increase the metabolic rate (temps & pulse) rather than eating any specific foods.
Derek said:post 109694For some people a peanut butter sandwich can increase the metabolic rate!
You don't have to agree with me.Derek said:post 109824 We can disagree can't we? Or do I have to agree with you?
I agree that high carb and calorie density can be very helpful sometimes, and I agree that this could be why a peanut butter jelly sandwich could have some beneficial effects on metabolism in some situations. I don't have any reason to think it's the peanut butter that is generally the beneficial part, though - could be the starch, salt, sugar, fruit. There are other kinds of sandwiches that have lower PUFA and might serve better.Derek said:post 109824 A peanut butter/jelly sandwich can raise the metabolic rate because it's high calorie/low water content/high carb!
According to Peat, vit-E can only partially protect against PUFA, and it's better to not have the PUFA in the first place, even if it does contain a little vit-E. It is not possible to eat food and completely avoid PUFA. So probably most (all?) of us accumulate more than optimal amounts of it in our bodies as we age. Supplementing vit-E with as little additional PUFA as possible is one way Peat has mentioned to help protect against the burden that is already there.Derek said:post 109824 Do you discount the amount of vitamin E in nuts in order to offset the effects of the PUFA contained?
I agree with you that high carb- and calorie-density can be important, and that for many people including some starchy food seems to help. People seem to vary a bit in terms of how much fat they benefit from - some may well have periods when it works better for them to include a bit more fat.Derek said:post 109824 Someone with hypoglycemia in my opinion needs to eat calorie dense, low water content, starchy/fat foods. You need to eat foods that satiate you in order to overcome this issue, and skim milk and sugar doesn't quite do it.
More during the day make s sense to me. And just a little before bed.naninani said:post 110047 I just wonder why that happened because I ate enough sugars before bedtime– around 180 g of carbs. And for me that is a lot because usually I eat less carbs before bed and more during the day. I would expect I would sleep all night long with that amonut.
Interesting post, jyb. Could you expand a little bit and explain what do you mean by kill your blood fatty acids?jyb said:post 109446extremecheddar said:post 109425 For example, I keep reading studied that show how good niacinamide is for glucose control/ diabetes. How ever for me and many other people, It made things worse.
Niacinamide kills your blood fatty acids. So if you were already hungry hypoglycaemic, I imagine the energy deficiency and therefore stress will increase. There are some Peaty supplements that I enjoy, but niacinamide is not one of them (I experimented with it a lot in the past - I concluded that overall I should not use it). I see where Peat is coming from with niacinamide and in theory I can see why it would be useful in some situations, but I'm definitely not in one of those situations.
tara said:post 111330You don't have to agree with me.Derek said:post 109824 We can disagree can't we? Or do I have to agree with you?
You don't have to agree with Peat, either.
But when you give advice here, I think it would be good to be clear when that advice diverges significantly from Peat's.
I agree that high carb and calorie density can be very helpful sometimes, and I agree that this could be why a peanut butter jelly sandwich could have some beneficial effects on metabolism in some situations. I don't have any reason to think it's the peanut butter that is generally the beneficial part, though - could be the starch, salt, sugar, fruit. There are other kinds of sandwiches that have lower PUFA and might serve better.Derek said:post 109824 A peanut butter/jelly sandwich can raise the metabolic rate because it's high calorie/low water content/high carb!
But there are situations where I think eating peanut butter sandwiches is probably a lot better than nothing - and that is when someone is recovering from life-threatening anorexia/bulimia/orthorexia etc, and needs to ditch the habits of extreme restriction in order to get enough food/energy in at all. Not because peanuts are particularly good, but because starvation kills quicker. If there are better palatable options available, so much the better.
The latter is my opinion, quite possibly not Peat's (I've not seen anything from him on this.)
According to Peat, vit-E can only partially protect against PUFA, and it's better to not have the PUFA in the first place, even if it does contain a little vit-E. It is not possible to eat food and completely avoid PUFA. So probably most (all?) of us accumulate more than optimal amounts of it in our bodies as we age. Supplementing vit-E with as little additional PUFA as possible is one way Peat has mentioned to help protect against the burden that is already there.Derek said:post 109824 Do you discount the amount of vitamin E in nuts in order to offset the effects of the PUFA contained?
I agree with you that high carb- and calorie-density can be important, and that for many people including some starchy food seems to help. People seem to vary a bit in terms of how much fat they benefit from - some may well have periods when it works better for them to include a bit more fat.Derek said:post 109824 Someone with hypoglycemia in my opinion needs to eat calorie dense, low water content, starchy/fat foods. You need to eat foods that satiate you in order to overcome this issue, and skim milk and sugar doesn't quite do it.
Suggesting that deliberately eating more PUFA/PUFA-rich food is going to help health and metabolism is still pretty directly contradictory to all the writing I've seen from Peat on this subject. As far as I can tell, Peat explicitly and consistently favours fat from coconuts, milk, ruminants, cacao. I have never read or heard him recommend eating nuts or any other high PUFA food.
Amazoniac said:post 111348Interesting post, jyb. Could you expand a little bit and explain what do you mean by kill your blood fatty acids?jyb said:post 109446extremecheddar said:post 109425 For example, I keep reading studied that show how good niacinamide is for glucose control/ diabetes. How ever for me and many other people, It made things worse.
Niacinamide kills your blood fatty acids. So if you were already hungry hypoglycaemic, I imagine the energy deficiency and therefore stress will increase. There are some Peaty supplements that I enjoy, but niacinamide is not one of them (I experimented with it a lot in the past - I concluded that overall I should not use it). I see where Peat is coming from with niacinamide and in theory I can see why it would be useful in some situations, but I'm definitely not in one of those situations.
No. Do you think he ever recommends peanut butter (with the exception of prolonged strandigns on deserted islands, etc)?Derek said:post 111431 You need to understand that all of Peat's advice and writing is only valuable in context. Do you think that in every case, for every person, he recommends the same thing?
Possibly high sugar/carb, probably lowish sat fat (and minimal PUFA), probably trying thyroid supps, maybe vit-E supp depending on history.Derek said:post 111431 Do you think if someone was hyperthyroid he would recommend eating a high carb/sugar, high saturated fat diet? Or that he would recommend thyroid supplementation and vitamin E?
tara said:post 111523No. Do you think he ever recommends peanut butter (with the exception of prolonged strandigns on deserted islands, etc)?Derek said:post 111431 You need to understand that all of Peat's advice and writing is only valuable in context. Do you think that in every case, for every person, he recommends the same thing?
Possibly high sugar/carb, probably lowish sat fat (and minimal PUFA), probably trying thyroid supps, maybe vit-E supp depending on history.Derek said:post 111431 Do you think if someone was hyperthyroid he would recommend eating a high carb/sugar, high saturated fat diet? Or that he would recommend thyroid supplementation and vitamin E?
Not directly. I'm not at all sure what I said above is what he would say to everybody - as we've both said, context matters. Sometimes he seems to give just one or two suggestions to try.Derek said:post 111526 Have you ever communicated with Peat?
I have tried b vitamins, glycine , taurine, k2, caffeine, starch, sugar, fat, pepicid, frequent eating, intermittent fasting, and nothing seems to be working. Is just getting worse.
For those who have had recurrent hypoglycemia, what has helped you the most?