@Peater Piper
haha that study is interesting.nice find.thanks!
so animals without cover made 40ng/ml vitamin d.and it lowered in proportion to body surface coverage.
i believe their fur blocks most of uvb , as you know uvb is not penetrating good. i think a normal clothing of humans in summer , a T-shirt gives us enough exposure to even make more than that.probably?!
a light clothing blocks most of blue and UV light and lets red and IR light to pass.
to me by looking at this study it seems like 40 ng/ml is around the optimal level. a level many experts also recommend.
and these animals make decent amount of retinol to balance that vitamin d . it can be really cool if we find data about how much retinol these animals can make a day!
haha that study is interesting.nice find.thanks!
so animals without cover made 40ng/ml vitamin d.and it lowered in proportion to body surface coverage.
i believe their fur blocks most of uvb , as you know uvb is not penetrating good. i think a normal clothing of humans in summer , a T-shirt gives us enough exposure to even make more than that.probably?!
a light clothing blocks most of blue and UV light and lets red and IR light to pass.
to me by looking at this study it seems like 40 ng/ml is around the optimal level. a level many experts also recommend.
and these animals make decent amount of retinol to balance that vitamin d . it can be really cool if we find data about how much retinol these animals can make a day!
Attachments
-
[email protected]245.6 KB · Views: 20