UNICEF Report Says Pornography Not Always Harmful to Children

mariantos

Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2021
Messages
483
I'm so tired of this ignorance. In a previous nofap thread this was discussed, and when i posted a study that shows orgasm is related in a dose-response manner to health the counterarguments stopped. Not even the courtesy to say you were right.

Use it or lose it, if you don't orgasm your sex hormone production decreases and you start to resemble a castrated individual. This is what science says in humans and animals, so nofap is a religious stance. What else could be used to justify it?
Certainly among these people are those who do it to conserve energy, because they feel weaker and weaker and have realized that they lose too easily, zinc, magnesium, calcium, amino acids, enzymes, vitamin C, etc. Other people have health problems and by abstinence they have learned that they can straighten out, others follow this practice for self-control, increased confidence, physical and mental regeneration. Others may feel guilty and believe that by abstaining from masturbation, they can heal their souls etc.

So there are multiple uses and we can't put them all in 'religious fanatics'.

But I understand your point of view, you probably mean those who forcefully impose, to others, the way that they consider right.
 

TheSir

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2019
Messages
1,952
when i posted a study that shows orgasm is related in a dose-response manner to health
Could you link to the study (unless it's the commonly referenced 21x times a month prostate cancer survey)? That may be me you're talking about. I never got around to checking out what you replied to me, sorry.
 
Last edited:

rei

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
1,607
Could you link to the study (unless it's the commonly referenced 21x times a month prostate cancer survey)? That may be me you're talking about. I never got around to checking out what you replied to me, sorry.
i don't have it at hand and don't feel like searching my post history. There ar enot many nofap threads i posted in so if you care you can find it somewhat easily.
 
Last edited:

stoic

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Messages
271
Use it or lose it, if you don't orgasm your sex hormone production decreases and you start to resemble a castrated individual. This is what science says in humans and animals, so nofap is a religious stance. What else could be used to justify it?
I haven't read any recent paper on the topic, however I remember a study that showed how testosterone levels slowly increase following masturbation, reaching a peak after seven days, then decreasing again – suggesting ejaculating once a week as the optimal strategy for health.
Still, an even better strategy would be abstaining from masturbation and orgasming from sex only, as it seems to also induce other, more beneficial reactions.
Also, I think I read somewhere on this forum that sex can help raise a man's free testosterone (not sure how true that is).
 

rei

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
1,607
Still, an even better strategy would be abstaining from masturbation and orgasming from sex only, as it seems to also induce other, more beneficial reactions.
I don't think anyone argues against that. If you have a partner and masturbate something is wrong. NOFAP is aimed at those that don't have this luxury and need to masturbate to have these physiological signals emitted.
 
Last edited:

HumanLife

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2019
Messages
366
Age
27
Remember the thread on homosexuals always having an androsterone/epitestosterone ratio below 1 and heterosexuals having a ratio of over 1?
What thread was this? Has this been deleted?

Anyone else might know?
 

Runenight201

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2018
Messages
1,942
Oh, there are plenty of biomarkers of sex/gender. For example, males produce a lot more hemoglobin and RBC than females do, and I think the lab ranges are different based on male/female sex for many of the mundane biomarkers. As such, if somebody "identified" as a member of the opposite sex and the lab switches their lab ranges to their newly "chosen" gender then that person will probably be diagnosed with all kinds of disorders or even tumors as many of their biomarkers will be ss out of whack. The androgens are an obvious such biomarker, but so is progesterone, estradiol, prolactin, and many other biomarkers related to blood production, liver function, muscle function/turnover (e.g. creatine kinase), etc. So, if a male decided to identify as a "female" but keeps the lab ranges for a male in his medical record this to me signifies that he is still most certainly a biological male and should be treated as such. If he wants to be a female then he has to produce evidence that his biology is also shifting in that direction, otherwise it is just fairytales and...fraud.
Remember the thread on homosexuals always having an androsterone/epitestosterone ratio below 1 and heterosexuals having a ratio of over 1? Well, similar kinds of ratios can be used to determine biological sex and if those ratios don't change but the person continues to claim they are of the opposite gender, I would treat them as severely mentally ill, even candidates for involuntary hospitalization.

Could you link the thread about sexual orientation and androsterone/epitestostetone ratio?
 

VitoScaletta

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
398
Location
Palestine
1655538171841.jpg
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom