UNICEF Report Says Pornography Not Always Harmful to Children

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,624
UNICEF and the UN involved with kids and sexuality again, the same organizations who promote teaching kids about sex from the age of 2, remember Epstein the child sex trafficker is tied in around all these global institutions, many of those linked in with him also.
The paedophile Trojan horse is well on its way to the gates under the guise of wokism, for example the transgender legislation in many countries will allow "persons" with penises of any age in female public changing rooms like swimming pools etc, kids can be present and if they complain they will be prosecuted for hate speech.

The woke left support all of this, they are mainly thought in universities in the humanities department, the humanities department has new become an global imperialist tool creating woke cults.
They are also big supporters of Michael Focault in their woke theories who was a paedophile.

Many religious organizations oppose this, I think this article has a religious angle, they need to understand that all religions have paedophiles in the highest positions of power, its faux outrage IMO, the religions have always been obsessed with access to traumatized kids as they are easier to manipulate.

We also have to keep in mind that UNICEF is another NGO full of professional humanitarians on massive salaries, the porn industry is worth billions, nothing is done objectively, even the humanitarians are now lobbied by big business.


WASHINGTON, D.C., May 14 (C-Fam) A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.

The report published by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were “neither upset nor happy.” In fact, the report UNICEF relies on says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.

Porn fighters disagree with the UNICEF data. “UNICEF’s report ignores the vast body of research demonstrating the harms of pornography to children. By ignoring the real harms pornography can have, UNICEF is playing roulette with children’s health and safety,” said Lisa Thompson, vice president and director of the Research Institute at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.

Thompson’s organization, which provides expert research to inform policy decisions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of women and children, has found that pornography can be a central driver of this abuse.

“Mainstream pornography contains horrific sexual abuse, rape, incest, racism – all of which children should not consume,” continued Thompson, and “UNICEF’s milquetoast assessment of the impacts hardcore pornography on children does nothing to challenge the political narrative that pornography is benign, and as a result, puts children in harm’s way.”

The 2020 EU Kids Online Study concluded that some children and young people “intentionally seek out sexual content” for a variety of reasons and that seeing sexual images “might also represent an opportunity” to provide answers to questions about puberty and sexual identity. The study encouraged “seeing the nuances” which lead children to seek out and view sexual content online.

UNICEF says any efforts to block children from accessing pornography online might infringe on their human rights. UNICEF bases this claim on an expansive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

UNICEF also claims that asking for age-verification to access pornography online may deny children access to what it calls “vital sexuality education.” It should be noted that critics charge “comprehensive sexuality education” is pornographic and harmful to children.

UNICEF’s release of this report comes just days after the U.S. Agency for International Development announced its renewal of its longstanding partnership with UNICEF, committing an additional $300 million in direct program funding. The U.S. is UNICEF’s largest government donor with 2020 funding reaching almost $994 million in humanitarian and development programs.


UNICEF generally has joined the feminist push at the United Nations in calls for abortion. The children’s agency was founded to help displaced children after the Second World War. Critics say UNICEF has strayed far from its founding vision, and that this call for children’s access to pornography under the guise of human rights and sex-ed underscores this change. At one time, the Holy See stopped its annual symbolic donation to UNICEF.
 

rei

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
1,607
clown.world

At one hand we have religious lunatic nofap idiots demonizing porn, on the other child sexualizing pedos. Hard for a normal person to take a stance when both extremes are batshit insane and no-one seems to stand in the middle.
 

andrew81

Member
Joined
May 10, 2021
Messages
24
clown.world

At one hand we have religious lunatic nofap idiots demonizing porn, on the other child sexualizing pedos. Hard for a normal person to take a stance when both extremes are batshit insane and no-one seems to stand in the middle.
pornography is bad no matter how you look at it , otherwise state at least 1 good thing that pornography does for you ... exactly .
Masturbation is a different topic .
 

mariantos

Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2021
Messages
462
clown.world

At one hand we have religious lunatic nofap idiots demonizing porn, on the other child sexualizing pedos. Hard for a normal person to take a stance when both extremes are batshit insane and no-one seems to stand in the middle.

I am not a religious fanatic, I am still full of misery and sins. But I believe we have a Creator, and He must be closest to Christ!

I do not think that God is satisfied and agrees with the hypersexuality in our society. He gave us the gift of sexual intercourse and usually it must be accompanied by love in order to be pleasing to the Lord. He also left us man and woman, if He had agreed to masturbation, onanism, He would have made only a man or vice versa.

I have never been obsessed with pornographic content, but I have consumed what is right a few times. I preferred to masturbate with the help of my sick imagination instead of pornography.

Most porn movies have and promote homosexuality, rape, incest, excessive violence, bizarre fetishes and everything else, only 1 gram of love does not. Sodom and Gomorrah in other words.

Most actresses are actors and vice versa, ie transsexuals, so many men lust for other men and women for women, not knowing what is really going on there. That is why many of those who enter to relax on such sites, then leave without strength, exhausted, tormented, etc.

Porn movies negatively influence the psyche, the emotional part and more.

I have not masturbated since October 2020 and I feel much better, calm, confident, energetic, etc. Let it not be understood that I promote this, otherwise I do not recommend it to those who do it out of fear or other restraints, on the contrary, to those who burn I recommend them to look for their partner, it is natural and healthy like that. Those who voluntarily had stayed without masturbated them and reconciled with the idea and the real fact that it is healthier that way, I wish them to continue like this.

We don't have to be extremists, I don't know if belonging to any of the above groups brings benefits. We need to look at the big picture rei. If we are not unconscious, then we will see things clearly and we can discern evil for good in any circumstance.
 

PxD

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
284
I
clown.world

At one hand we have religious lunatic nofap idiots demonizing porn, on the other child sexualizing pedos. Hard for a normal person to take a stance when both extremes are batshit insane and no-one seems to stand in the middle.
I don’t think the Nofap movement has much, if any, connection to religion. From what I’ve seen it stems from the self-improvement movement. On top of that there is nothing damaging about abstaining from orgasm. On the other hand, there is evidence showing that pornography is damaging and excessive self-stimulation can mess with one’s psychological and physiological state. Comparing the two ends of this spectrum is a false equivalency.
 

stoic

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Messages
126
I

I don’t think the Nofap movement has much, if any, connection to religion. From what I’ve seen it stems from the self-improvement movement. On top of that there is nothing damaging about abstaining from orgasm. On the other hand, there is evidence showing that pornography is damaging and excessive self-stimulation can mess with one’s psychological and physiological state. Comparing the two ends of this spectrum is a false equivalency.
I don't think pornography itself is an issue, it's the constant availability and infinite supply of the internet that is causing people to become dependent on it and search for increasingly extreme acts.
The internet is causing these issues, and not just with pornography but with other forms of entertainment too.
I believe men in particular are visual creatures and can benefit from a reasonable use of pornography, as long as it doesn't become a substitute to (looking for) an actual partner.
I can see how most porn today can be degenerate, but looking at beautiful pictures of women, for instance, can be an effective stress relief and a source of inspiration.
 

TheSir

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2019
Messages
871
but looking at beautiful pictures of women, for instance, can be an effective stress relief and a source of inspiration.
The female form can cause either inspiration or perspiration, but only in rare cases both at the same time.

Hard for a normal person to take a stance when both extremes are batshit insane and no-one seems to stand in the middle.
The normal person takes no stance. He happily consumes and moves on to the next thing. If you are neither a fanatic nor a pedophile, what could you possibly have to add to the debate?
 

Drareg

Member
Thread starter
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,624
clown.world

At one hand we have religious lunatic nofap idiots demonizing porn, on the other child sexualizing pedos. Hard for a normal person to take a stance when both extremes are batshit insane and no-one seems to stand in the middle.
I know right, that’s why its best to not take an ideological moralizing stance on most issues when dealing with fanatics, weed legalization is another example where I’m for legalizing it but also informing people it limits androgen production, when it comes to kids though its not easy to stand by and say nothing, it’s clear manipulation by bioenergetically incoherent adults to manipulate a younger human being who is still building their bioenergetic capacitance, paedo‘s do this because they can’t control adults with a higher bioenergetic capacitance.
 

Drareg

Member
Thread starter
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,624
I am not a religious fanatic, I am still full of misery and sins. But I believe we have a Creator, and He must be closest to Christ!

I do not think that God is satisfied and agrees with the hypersexuality in our society. He gave us the gift of sexual intercourse and usually it must be accompanied by love in order to be pleasing to the Lord. He also left us man and woman, if He had agreed to masturbation, onanism, He would have made only a man or vice versa.

I have never been obsessed with pornographic content, but I have consumed what is right a few times. I preferred to masturbate with the help of my sick imagination instead of pornography.

Most porn movies have and promote homosexuality, rape, incest, excessive violence, bizarre fetishes and everything else, only 1 gram of love does not. Sodom and Gomorrah in other words.

Most actresses are actors and vice versa, ie transsexuals, so many men lust for other men and women for women, not knowing what is really going on there. That is why many of those who enter to relax on such sites, then leave without strength, exhausted, tormented, etc.

Porn movies negatively influence the psyche, the emotional part and more.

I have not masturbated since October 2020 and I feel much better, calm, confident, energetic, etc. Let it not be understood that I promote this, otherwise I do not recommend it to those who do it out of fear or other restraints, on the contrary, to those who burn I recommend them to look for their partner, it is natural and healthy like that. Those who voluntarily had stayed without masturbated them and reconciled with the idea and the real fact that it is healthier that way, I wish them to continue like this.

We don't have to be extremists, I don't know if belonging to any of the above groups brings benefits. We need to look at the big picture rei. If we are not unconscious, then we will see things clearly and we can discern evil for good in any circumstance.
Defecting to God as the answer removes responsibility for our actions, the logic doesn’t add up, if God created all in this physical system including satan then he created porn and degeneracy by allowing the capacity for said moving forms to unfold in reality.

Most people doing porn are in it because of socio economic status, the churches of all religions have done nothing to rectify this, they enrich the top of the hierarchy instead, the Vatican is a prime example, the Vatican bank invests its money on wallstreet, so do rabbis and the Muslim leaders.
When we have a famine they ask the public for a charitable bailout rather than using their own money to help their worshippers, all we get is a token contribution from them. They get their money from said worshippers also.
 

Drareg

Member
Thread starter
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,624
I don't think pornography itself is an issue, it's the constant availability and infinite supply of the internet that is causing people to become dependent on it and search for increasingly extreme acts.
The internet is causing these issues, and not just with pornography but with other forms of entertainment too.
I believe men in particular are visual creatures and can benefit from a reasonable use of pornography, as long as it doesn't become a substitute to (looking for) an actual partner.
I can see how most porn today can be degenerate, but looking at beautiful pictures of women, for instance, can be an effective stress relief and a source of inspiration.
Well said, it’s a slippery slope.
The real question is how many women would do porn if they were financially secure, in fact how many men would do it if financially secure, sporadic occasional voyeurism might still occur but this shouldn’t lead into the slippery slope of depravity If all involved are hormonally coherent with low stress.

I think masturbating while using the imagination is probably more beneficial overall, exercise the mind and balls, nothing will beat the intimacy of physical touch though.
 

haidut

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
18,027
Location
USA / Europe
UNICEF and the UN involved with kids and sexuality again, the same organizations who promote teaching kids about sex from the age of 2, remember Epstein the child sex trafficker is tied in around all these global institutions, many of those linked in with him also.
The paedophile Trojan horse is well on its way to the gates under the guise of wokism, for example the transgender legislation in many countries will allow "persons" with penises of any age in female public changing rooms like swimming pools etc, kids can be present and if they complain they will be prosecuted for hate speech.

The woke left support all of this, they are mainly thought in universities in the humanities department, the humanities department has new become an global imperialist tool creating woke cults.
They are also big supporters of Michael Focault in their woke theories who was a paedophile.

Many religious organizations oppose this, I think this article has a religious angle, they need to understand that all religions have paedophiles in the highest positions of power, its faux outrage IMO, the religions have always been obsessed with access to traumatized kids as they are easier to manipulate.

We also have to keep in mind that UNICEF is another NGO full of professional humanitarians on massive salaries, the porn industry is worth billions, nothing is done objectively, even the humanitarians are now lobbied by big business.


WASHINGTON, D.C., May 14 (C-Fam) A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.

The report published by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were “neither upset nor happy.” In fact, the report UNICEF relies on says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.

Porn fighters disagree with the UNICEF data. “UNICEF’s report ignores the vast body of research demonstrating the harms of pornography to children. By ignoring the real harms pornography can have, UNICEF is playing roulette with children’s health and safety,” said Lisa Thompson, vice president and director of the Research Institute at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.

Thompson’s organization, which provides expert research to inform policy decisions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of women and children, has found that pornography can be a central driver of this abuse.

“Mainstream pornography contains horrific sexual abuse, rape, incest, racism – all of which children should not consume,” continued Thompson, and “UNICEF’s milquetoast assessment of the impacts hardcore pornography on children does nothing to challenge the political narrative that pornography is benign, and as a result, puts children in harm’s way.”

The 2020 EU Kids Online Study concluded that some children and young people “intentionally seek out sexual content” for a variety of reasons and that seeing sexual images “might also represent an opportunity” to provide answers to questions about puberty and sexual identity. The study encouraged “seeing the nuances” which lead children to seek out and view sexual content online.

UNICEF says any efforts to block children from accessing pornography online might infringe on their human rights. UNICEF bases this claim on an expansive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

UNICEF also claims that asking for age-verification to access pornography online may deny children access to what it calls “vital sexuality education.” It should be noted that critics charge “comprehensive sexuality education” is pornographic and harmful to children.

UNICEF’s release of this report comes just days after the U.S. Agency for International Development announced its renewal of its longstanding partnership with UNICEF, committing an additional $300 million in direct program funding. The U.S. is UNICEF’s largest government donor with 2020 funding reaching almost $994 million in humanitarian and development programs.


UNICEF generally has joined the feminist push at the United Nations in calls for abortion. The children’s agency was founded to help displaced children after the Second World War. Critics say UNICEF has strayed far from its founding vision, and that this call for children’s access to pornography under the guise of human rights and sex-ed underscores this change. At one time, the Holy See stopped its annual symbolic donation to UNICEF.

As expected. Remember our recent discussion in another thread about children consenting to various procedures because the state deems them "adult in mind"? Next step is them "consenting" to a sex with a pedo or, even more bizarre, the pedo "choosing" to identify as a "child" so that the act is no longer child molestation as both parties are "children".
 

Drareg

Member
Thread starter
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,624
As expected. Remember our recent discussion in another thread about children consenting to various procedures because the state deems them "adult in mind"? Next step is them "consenting" to a sex with a pedo or, even more bizarre, the pedo "choosing" to identify as a "child" so that the act is no longer child molestation as both parties are "children".
This seems to be wired into the woke narrative alright, it’s no surprise when michael focault has propagated their minds.

This is definitely the angle they will take, identify as a child, most folks won’t understand what you are onto here but your right. When we look at it through the lens they use to justify sex changing it becomes clear, part of the paedophiles brain is still like a child is how the MSM articles will begin introducing it, I expect these soon, we already seen what they done with language for the term pederast, it’s a paedophile, until the prefrontal cortex is formed kids need to be protected from those with full formed cortexes, we can even argue from a biological capacitance point of view.

By the way do you think it’s possible to prove via samples of tissue outside sex organs what the sex is based on bioenergetic direction? The epigenetic residue should tell us relative to nad+ levels how much testosterone is converting to DHT for example. This conversion bias is genetically primed in the womb for life, we are also primed create more testosterone in general as men via genomic instruction relative to female.
 

PxD

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
284
Most people doing porn are in it because of socio economic status, the churches of all religions have done nothing to rectify this, they enrich the top of the hierarchy instead, the Vatican is a prime example, the Vatican bank invests its money on wallstreet, so do rabbis and the Muslim leaders.
When we have a famine they ask the public for a charitable bailout rather than using their own money to help their worshippers, all we get is a token contribution from them. They get their money from said worshippers also.
So your logic is that religious institutions should pay people not to engage in porn production, or what? From what I know of strippers/prostitutes, the vast majority have psychological problems (daddy issues).

I don’t know about the Jews and Muslims but the Vatican does a ***t ton of charitable work. It also subsidizes parochial schools all over the world. My kids are in catholic school and I’m grateful for the relatively cheap tuition as well as the emphasis on traditional values in their education.
 

mariantos

Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2021
Messages
462
Defecting to God as the answer removes responsibility for our actions, the logic doesn’t add up, if God created all in this physical system including satan then he created porn and degeneracy by allowing the capacity for said moving forms to unfold in reality.

Most people doing porn are in it because of socio economic status, the churches of all religions have done nothing to rectify this, they enrich the top of the hierarchy instead, the Vatican is a prime example, the Vatican bank invests its money on wallstreet, so do rabbis and the Muslim leaders.
When we have a famine they ask the public for a charitable bailout rather than using their own money to help their worshippers, all we get is a token contribution from them. They get their money from said worshippers also.
God did not create pornography. There is no point in hypothetical speech.
He has given us free will and allows everything that happens because :

Matthew 13:30
Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

These men and women, respectively, who sell their bodies so easily and for less impressive sums of money, prefer comfort and immorality instead of decency. Many of them are transgender in secret, others have emotional and mental problems and over time they end up having problems of physical nature also. They do not want to get tired of working in another ethic field of work and the irony is that they retire from their life careers almost consumed.

As for religion, it is a sensitive subject for me. Most churches today are monopolized by the Jesuits,they have infiltrated even in the most devoted church of Christ, and perverted them. No one should be surprised that it has become an extremely effective tool in the hands of those above. Soon the religious denominations will all come together.

Faith is different from religion.
 

haidut

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
18,027
Location
USA / Europe
By the way do you think it’s possible to prove via samples of tissue outside sex organs what the sex is based on bioenergetic direction? The epigenetic residue should tell us relative to nad+ levels how much testosterone is converting to DHT for example. This conversion bias is genetically primed in the womb for life, we are also primed create more testosterone in general as men via genomic instruction relative to female.

Oh, there are plenty of biomarkers of sex/gender. For example, males produce a lot more hemoglobin and RBC than females do, and I think the lab ranges are different based on male/female sex for many of the mundane biomarkers. As such, if somebody "identified" as a member of the opposite sex and the lab switches their lab ranges to their newly "chosen" gender then that person will probably be diagnosed with all kinds of disorders or even tumors as many of their biomarkers will be ss out of whack. The androgens are an obvious such biomarker, but so is progesterone, estradiol, prolactin, and many other biomarkers related to blood production, liver function, muscle function/turnover (e.g. creatine kinase), etc. So, if a male decided to identify as a "female" but keeps the lab ranges for a male in his medical record this to me signifies that he is still most certainly a biological male and should be treated as such. If he wants to be a female then he has to produce evidence that his biology is also shifting in that direction, otherwise it is just fairytales and...fraud.
Remember the thread on homosexuals always having an androsterone/epitestosterone ratio below 1 and heterosexuals having a ratio of over 1? Well, similar kinds of ratios can be used to determine biological sex and if those ratios don't change but the person continues to claim they are of the opposite gender, I would treat them as severely mentally ill, even candidates for involuntary hospitalization.
 

Drareg

Member
Thread starter
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,624
So your logic is that religious institutions should pay people not to engage in porn production, or what? From what I know of strippers/prostitutes, the vast majority have psychological problems (daddy issues).

I don’t know about the Jews and Muslims but the Vatican does a ***t ton of charitable work. It also subsidizes parochial schools all over the world. My kids are in catholic school and I’m grateful for the relatively cheap tuition as well as the emphasis on traditional values in their education.
No they should stop siphoning money from the tax payer and using said money as leverage in stocks and shares, if society has an opportunity for most people to earn and secure themselves a home, food and water they can own outright at some point then prostitution and porn production will drop to reasonable levels, many stuck in porn addiction are under chronic stress. We will always have people in society who don’t want to work regardless of opportunities available, when it comes to owning a home outright people with differing levels of intelligence will reach this goal at different speeds, less intelligent people in general will take longer to achieve it but if the opportunity is there and achievable within a reasonable timeframe it creates a goal to focus on, meaning essentially.

I agree on the psychological problems, what we have to remember is in many cases the daddy’s are under similar socioeconomic stresses as mentioned above, it’s a cycle.

Don’t get we wrong I would send my kids to a Catholic/christian school before a progressive woke school in these times and I’m agnostic, the reality is the Vatican is likely worth trillions assets included so it’s a tiny amount they spend on things like this, we can’t even audit their accounts, they still receive tax payer subsidies all over the world.
 

Drareg

Member
Thread starter
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,624
God did not create pornography. There is no point in hypothetical speech.
He has given us free will and allows everything that happens because :

Matthew 13:30
Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

These men and women, respectively, who sell their bodies so easily and for less impressive sums of money, prefer comfort and immorality instead of decency. Many of them are transgender in secret, others have emotional and mental problems and over time they end up having problems of physical nature also. They do not want to get tired of working in another ethic field of work and the irony is that they retire from their life careers almost consumed.

As for religion, it is a sensitive subject for me. Most churches today are monopolized by the Jesuits,they have infiltrated even in the most devoted church of Christ, and perverted them. No one should be surprised that it has become an extremely effective tool in the hands of those above. Soon the religious denominations will all come together.

Faith is different from religion.

If god created free will and knows all then by default he created a system that allows for porn and degeneracy, if it was a mistake or a glitch then he is fallible.
 

Drareg

Member
Thread starter
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,624
Oh, there are plenty of biomarkers of sex/gender. For example, males produce a lot more hemoglobin and RBC than females do, and I think the lab ranges are different based on male/female sex for many of the mundane biomarkers. As such, if somebody "identified" as a member of the opposite sex and the lab switches their lab ranges to their newly "chosen" gender then that person will probably be diagnosed with all kinds of disorders or even tumors as many of their biomarkers will be ss out of whack. The androgens are an obvious such biomarker, but so is progesterone, estradiol, prolactin, and many other biomarkers related to blood production, liver function, muscle function/turnover (e.g. creatine kinase), etc. So, if a male decided to identify as a "female" but keeps the lab ranges for a male in his medical record this to me signifies that he is still most certainly a biological male and should be treated as such. If he wants to be a female then he has to produce evidence that his biology is also shifting in that direction, otherwise it is just fairytales and...fraud.
Remember the thread on homosexuals always having an androsterone/epitestosterone ratio below 1 and heterosexuals having a ratio of over 1? Well, similar kinds of ratios can be used to determine biological sex and if those ratios don't change but the person continues to claim they are of the opposite gender, I would treat them as severely mentally ill, even candidates for involuntary hospitalization.
Biochemists must know this, a detailed manifesto of definitions could be created within 6 months to debunk this infantile narrative. It’s more than x/y chromosomes and sex organs.
People are comparing the stupidity to lobotomies and past procedures that seem like lunacy but in reality it’s much worse, we have the information and experience available to debunk this cult yet it continues and is pushed into public policy.

We know what really drives it though and that’s the fact it’s a billion dollar industry, it wouldn’t surprise we if the medical establishment begin "diagnosing" them as the opposite sex to justify treatments for more profit again.
 

Energizer

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
574
UNICEF, the UN's "child charity", disturbing that this is what they're openly saying. They should be investigated immediately.
 

rei

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
1,607
I

I don’t think the Nofap movement has much, if any, connection to religion. From what I’ve seen it stems from the self-improvement movement. On top of that there is nothing damaging about abstaining from orgasm. On the other hand, there is evidence showing that pornography is damaging and excessive self-stimulation can mess with one’s psychological and physiological state. Comparing the two ends of this spectrum is a false equivalency.
I'm so tired of this ignorance. In a previous nofap thread this was discussed, and when i posted a study that shows orgasm is related in a dose-response manner to health the counterarguments stopped. Not even the courtesy to say you were right.

Use it or lose it, if you don't orgasm your sex hormone production decreases and you start to resemble a castrated individual. This is what science says in humans and animals, so nofap is a religious stance. What else could be used to justify it?
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
Pina Audit of ED COVID-19 Coding Report 11 by John Dee Viruses, Parasites, Fungus, Vaccines 1
F Gov Is Above The Law: OSHA Not Requiring Employers Report Worker Injection Injury Society 3
ecstatichamster Report any side effects from vitamin K2 here Supplements, Pharmaceutical Drugs 27
Brave Heart SPECIAL REPORT-How the pandemic laid bare America's diabetes crisis Viruses, Parasites, Fungus, Vaccines 2
sibyloftherhine Help with understanding Pfizer report: Accumulation of vaccine in ovaries Vaccines 13
L Japanese report saying Sake for prevention of Covid ......trial already started Vaccines 4
meatbag Corbett Report: W Webb Dissects Wellcome Leap into Transhumanism, Big Tech, MIC, and WEF Political Talk, Alternative World Theories 15
tankasnowgod "Real News" sites go full John Magufuli, Seriously report that Otters have COVID 19. Animals 5
charlie The treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth with enteric-coated peppermint oil: a case report Scientific Studies 57
mayku-T-meelo Initial report of decreased SARS-CoV-2 viral load after inoculation with the BNT162b2 vaccine Vaccines 15
GelatinGoblin Can any users report warm hands/feet after dates? Diet 14
Brave Heart Virologists Report Poor Man’s Amino Acid Cure For Covid-19 Would Abolish Need For Vaccines Viruses, Parasites, Fungus, Vaccines 9
P Cardiologist Report: Thickening of My Heart Wall Heart, Heart Rate, Blood Pressure 19
Tristan Loscha (EU) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report: EnCyzix (Enclomifene) Hormones 3
M Quick Report: 4 Months On 19nors VS 4 Months On Dutasteride Hair & Nails 16
Amazigh Astronomers Report They’ve Detected The Amino Acid Glycine In The Atmosphere Of Venus Miscellaneous Health Discussions 12
E Progestene First Experience Report Hormones 18
meatbag Corbett Report: Transhumanism-looking Forward To End Of Humanity Political Talk, Alternative World Theories 3
Brave Heart German Gov Report Says Corona False Alarm Viruses, Parasites, Fungus, Vaccines 4
Drareg Corbett Report On Bill Jeffrey Epstein Gates Viruses, Parasites, Fungus, Vaccines 21
charlie US Hospitals Receive As Much As $471,000 For Every COVID-19 Case They Report Breaking News 2
Randle Cyclist Dinitrophenol Comprehensive Report Articles & Scientific Studies 0
H Thiamine And Hashimoto's Thyroiditis: A Report Of Three Cases Digestion, Gut Flora 8
G Photobiomodulation And Photodynamic Cosmetic Therapy On Hair Growth: Case Report Hair & Nails 1
F Has Anyone Had Used Legitimate DHT In The Past? And Can Report How It Made Them Feel? Thyroid and Hormones 8
A Why The Mueller Report Came Up With Their Results Political Talk, Alternative World Theories 5
L Successful Human Scar Regeneration By Topical Iodine: A Case Report: An Interim (3.5 Year) Summary Articles & Scientific Studies 40
raypeatclips Prolactin And IBS. Case Report Of IBS Cured By Cabergoline Scientific Studies 3
kreeese PROGRESS REPORT FASTEST FAT LOSS EVER THANKS TO RAYYY Diet 467
M Methylene Blue For Clinical Anaphylaxis Treatment: A Case Report Articles & Scientific Studies 2
healthnatura Report Side Effects Here Please Health Natura 2
charlie Seymour Hersh report on Syria: White House knew US was arming Islamic State Political Talk, Alternative World Theories 1
bradley Report from altitude Altitude, Weather 14
A This Doctor says sunlight causes cancer!! Ask For Help or Advice 45
J The WHO website says covid vaccines are safe for most people OVER THE AGE OF 18 Ask For Help or Advice 0
S Nathan Hatch says all we need is olive oil Fats 7
Giraffe Children should not be vaccinated against covid-19 says WHO Viruses, Parasites, Fungus, Vaccines 64
Mito ‘Ignore The CDC’: Johns Hopkins Professor Says Half Of Americans Have ‘Natural Immunity’ Health 13
jay123 OSHA Abruptly Reverses Course, Says Employers Will Not Be Liable for COVID Vaccine Injuries After All Vaccines 1
Mito Blood Expert Says He Found Why Some Covid-19 Vaccines Trigger Rare Clots Miscellaneous Health Discussions 4
Mito Joe Rogan says 'healthy' young people don't need to worry about getting COVID-19 vaccine Miscellaneous Health Discussions 33
A Study says low serotonin causes mice and rabbits to become gay Scientific Studies 3
Mito Pfizer says COVID vaccine protection lasts at least 6 months; Company can now seek full FDA approval Miscellaneous Health Discussions 3
P PHD doctor of virology says Covid-19 is just FLU. "COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious" Society 98
AlexR Bill Gates, Real-Life Supervillain, Says Meditation Is His New Favorite Habit (2018) Mental Issues 30
Hugh Johnson ACLU declares ‘transgender myths DEBUNKED,’ says trans girls don't have any ‘unfair advantage’ in women’s sports Society 5
Kvothe WHO says PCR tests not valid diagnosis, create false positives Miscellaneous Health Discussions 3
Mito WHO says PCR positive no longer = Covid Miscellaneous Health Discussions 82
H Moderna CEO says the world will have to live with Covid ‘forever’ Society 7
haidut Cuomo says NY must reopen ASAP or they will be nothing left to reopen Political Talk, Alternative World Theories 68

Similar threads

Top