Ukraine Crisis

OP
L

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265

Absolutely in time with their own deadlines (26th of June) indicating that their general staff has now a good grasp of the tactical situation.

And another time that ISW has been absolutely proven wrong. They predicted a slow grind at Severodonetsk and Russia not having the strength to grab much more of the surrounding territories. Let alone closing the pincer.

Now they have done all that and even routed the UAF there
 

yerrag

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
10,883
Location
Manila

Peachy

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2021
Messages
2,359
Fox News: “Russia is methodically moving through and destroying Ukrainian forces in the Donbas. More than just capturing territory, they’re destroying their ability to defend the country anywhere else.”

And then a most excellent Freudian slip toward the end of the 2-min clip.

 

Pistachio

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
763
Biden today announced a new upcoming covid pandemic - more vaccines to inject to bring immune system down.

“Ultimately, we need more money, not only for vaccines for children. We need more money to plan for a second pandemic. There will be another pandemic. We must think ahead. That's why we need money," the American leader said.

BTW, UA flag is also a flag of down syndrome:

View attachment 38198
 
OP
L

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
@Pistachio

You are constantly off topic the threads subject. Can’t you just make another thread for your „theories“. Especially since your contributions are mostly from poor sources, as far as I can tell from reading maybe a handful of those links. Hardly anyone is clicking on them anyway.


ISW:
The new sitrep is on a level with Third Reich Wochenschau tactical assessments 1943


Russian forces have made substantial gains in the Severodonetsk-Lysychansk area over the last several days and Ukrainian troops continue to suffer high casualties, but Ukrainian forces have fundamentally accomplished their objective in the battle by slowing down and degrading Russian forces. Head of the Luhansk Oblast Administration Serhiy Haidai stated on June 23 that Ukrainian troops may have to retreat to avoid encirclement in Lysychansk, which indicates that Ukrainian authorities are setting conditions to prepare for the ultimate loss of both Severodonetsk and Lysychansk.[6] As ISW has previously assessed, however, the loss of Severodonetsk and Lysychansk will not represent a major turning point in the war.[7] Ukrainian troops have succeeded for weeks in drawing substantial quantities of Russian personnel, weapons, and equipment into the area and have likely degraded Russian forces' overall capabilities while preventing Russian forces from focusing on more advantageous axes of advance. Russian offensive operations will likely stall in the coming weeks, whether or not Russian forces capture the Severodonetsk-Lysychansk area, likely granting Ukrainian forces the opportunity to launch prudent counteroffensives. The Kremlin’s ideological fixation on the capture of Severodonetsk, much like the earlier siege of Azovstal, will likely be to the ultimate detriment of Russian capabilities in future advances in Ukraine. The loss of Severodonetsk is a loss for Ukraine in the sense that any terrain captured by Russian forces is a loss—but the battle of Severodonetsk will not be a decisive Russian victory.
 
OP
L

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
Can only imagine that commanders and officers tell their troops that retreat /pull out is all planned for and to be executed when safety is ensured but still Holding Long enough to inflict maximum damage on the Russians.

Then it turns out for the ordinary trooper that their Retreat is thorough heavily contested lanes.

This massively erodes trust in command
 

yerrag

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
10,883
Location
Manila
Spoken like a true Marxist.

If there is a good model to follow, and you follow it, and if the colonizer provided a good blueprint, certainly credit must be given by the colonized to where it is due.

Germany and the United Kingdom copied the civil service system of China that made China great before it got weakened by Jesuit and Masonic and Talmudist decadence culminating in the Opium War (which China lost and it got weakened and impoverished to pave the way for it to be an easy prey of communism).

In this sense, China never needed to be colonized to be thankful.

However, both Germany and England became prosperous by adopting China's exemplary civil service system and governance. Without China needing to colonize them for them to become better.

In turn, England and possibly Germany spread China's superb system of governance into its colonies, and the colonies got good blueprints to nation build successfully when they became independent.

However, not all colonizers were able to provide good blueprints to their colonies. Among these are France, Portugal, Spain, and last but not the least the United States.

Africa (France), Portugal (Brazil), Spain ( most of South and Central America), and Cuba and the Philippines (USA) were terrible colonizers, and it shows.

If there were a few colonized countries that are doing well, such as Vietnam (France), and in a much earlier time the Netherlands (Spain), it was because these people already have a system and became successful despite, and not because of, their colonizers.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals
Back
Top Bottom