UK Vaccine loopholes?

[For Peat's Sake]

So for a long time, and should the need arise, I have trying to find out how I may legally be able to pursue vaccine exemption (through genuine medical issues I am encountering). Forgive me if any of this is flawed, but I thought it may be useful to bring to the attention of others some of the information I have found out which might possibly be of use to them also.

So to begin with I decided to see what the exemption information hinted at.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/covid-19-medical-exemptions-proving-you-are-unable-to-get-vaccinated

One thing I noted was how most of the language on the Government website is very vague. So in one respect it will suggest you are so limited in your choice, then throw in a vague contradiction to what has just been implied. For example "The possible reasons for exemptions are limited" which is followed by four varying reasons of exemption, which are then followed by "Other medical conditions could also allow you to get a medical exemption". This is then proceeded by a way to get a form and very little information on what else constitutes a reason for exemption. It leaves you deliberately in the dark over what is classified as a real reason. So by that logic what are the other reasons I wonder to myself? This is where the following guide might be useful.

So this is a guide explaining to those who work in care homes that they don't have to have the vaccine under certain circumstances. Which leads me to think there is quite possibly and obvious crossover potential in the stipulations laid out for those working in care homes and the everyday exemption seeker.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/temporary-medical-exemptions-for-covid-19-vaccination-of-people-working-or-deployed-in-care-homes/temporary-medical-exemptions-for-covid-19-vaccination-of-people-working-or-deployed-in-care-homes

So again the same who is exempt reasons pop up again. However it leads us to now understand a little more about each vaccine and how each vaccine has conditions which may lead to someone not being required to take them. Section 4.4. Where is this section 4.4? Well it's on each link for each vaccine. The reasons listed here are also much more open to flexibility of abstinence if you ask me.
Pfizer
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine
Astrazeneca
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca/information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca
Moderna
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-covid-19-vaccine-moderna/information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-covid-19-vaccine-moderna

Some of these reasons suit me and may also now give some openness to interpretation for many others. It is worth noting thier existence. In my pursuit of finding out about these lists an accident led me to discover the Employment Rights Act Section 44. The irony of 4.4 and 44.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/section/44
https://section44.co.uk/

By all means feel free to rip me to bits but some of what is in there is definitely not being made widely known and should help someone or someone you know. The very best of health to you all.

 

[Peater]

Here is my loophole.



No.

 

[ThinPicking]

Here is my loophole.



No.

Couldn't agree more. Don't play their games.

 

[For Peat's Sake]

Agree as well, I wont be going near it. But I'll be making sure I know how to twist their nonsense and throw it back at them.

 

[tankasnowgod]

If you think Infanticide is Morally Reprehensible, you have a Religious Exemption. Pretty much the whole world does.

Was COVID vaccine fetal tissue obtained by the murder of an infant? « Jon Rappoport's Blog

The vaccine: A religious exemption for the whole world « Jon Rappoport's Blog

New evidence for infanticide in the creation of the fetal cell line used for COVID vaccine testing « Jon Rappoport's Blog

As Jon Rappoport says, this is straight up murder of a living, breathing infant with a beating heart (critical). Not just abortion, of which there is also a moral argument.

This fits in with the idea that organ donation must be taken from the living, something which has been discussed on the forum before-

From Someone Dead You Can't Take Living Organs

We all intuitively understand when a person is dead: the breathing stopped, the heart stopped beating and the body has become cold. .... Here is a couple of things I came across reading about transplant medicine and listening to testimonials of parents who had agreed to organ donation after...

raypeatforum.com

 

[tankasnowgod]

By all means feel free to rip me to bits but some of what is in there is definitely not being made widely known and should help someone or someone you know. The very best of health to you all.

I don't know why anyone would rip you to bits. We're in a war, and all sorts of ways of fighting back should be explored, and encouraged, and shared. I personally like the strategy of using their own system against them.

 

[For Peat's Sake]

I don't know why anyone would rip you to bits. We're in a war, and all sorts of ways of fighting back should be explored, and encouraged, and shared. I personally like the strategy of using their own system against them.

Thank you, that's very much where I'm coming from, kind of you to say as well. I work for myself so I'm ok but if I can use their system against them then I will take every chance. It's not a "you should have the vaccine but here's a way for some to get out of it" stance from me, I hate the idea of a vaccination being forced on anyone and this might help someone who gets forced into a position at any point. Well said.