Transmissible Viral Vaccines... how the shots are affecting those who haven't taken it. They may be designed to do exactly that

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
@Nemo,
Thank you for you persistence. We have not been doing vaccines for at least 20 years and have continued to decline them. We have already been avoiding those who have taken the vaccine. It seems common sense to assume that the vaccinated are contagious at least for a few weeks if not forever.
Also this went up:

Good link, thank you.

SARS-CoV-2 is a spike protein bioweapon stuck into two relatively benign virus carriers. The vax is the same spike protein, modified to be more virulent and placed in an even more diabolical carrier.

The spike protein was patented in 2017 by Moderna. Ralph Baric's on video in 2015 talking about how pathogenic he was able to make a coronavirus and if I remember correctly, he refers to a spike protein.

This is a bioweapon so why would it not be transmissible? If you were illegally designing a bioweapon to take out a military opponent, would you design it to be transmissible or would you be careful about the informed consent of the enemy population?

Lee Merritt, who worked in the Navy on bioweapons defense, says the vax appears to work like a transmissible vax that was tested on a mouse population in Australia a few years ago. That vax targeted ovaries too.

The minute you realize this was developed at Ft. Detrick as well as with illegally-funded research at Moderna, that Winnipeg lab, Baric's lab, Ecohealth, and the Wuhan lab, with DoD and laundered HHS and NIAID money, it changes the odds on everything.
 

Giraffe

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
3,730


If I understood him right he says that the vaccinated are not protected from the variants, and that they can get infected with the variants, and then they shed the virus. - So what?

I think this man is just annoying. Complete waste of time to listen to him. He is obsessed with variants, and with getting his own experimental vaccine rolled out.

Viruses do mutate, all the time. It's nothing new. Our immune system will manage fine. I am not scared of so-called variants. I don't know what the immune system of the jabbed ones does though.
 

Ledo

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
406
On p. 17, you can see where the mRNA travels from the injection site. It goes everywhere. First to your lymph nodes, then heavily to your spleen and liver, but also to your blood, lungs, brain, etc.

Depending on the vax you got, your nanoparticles may accumulate in one organ, and other vax material in other organs.
What is provable in this regard, that the spike protein is hitting these organs as a result of the vaccine?
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
What is provable in this regard, that the spike protein is hitting these organs as a result of the vaccine?

We know that from the European Medicines Agency, which has found the vax RNA in every tissue of the body except the kidneys.


And we know this from a Pfizer document:


Tables of organ distribution start on p. 16 of 23.

And we know from other studies how the vax mRNA gets to all these organs:


Also it's been proven that the vax spike proteins circulate through the blood. They collected blood samples daily from 13 vaxxed young nurses for 56 days that showed the vax spike proteins circulating. The link is somewhere here. I think Lollipop posted it.

And we also know from peoples' adverse reactions to the shots. People are getting brain blood clots and pulmonary blood clots and heart inflammation and ovary/testes inflammation that is rendering their eggs and sperm unviable because that's what the spike protein does when it attaches to ACE2 receptors in those organs.
 

Ledo

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
406
We know that from the European Medicines Agency, which has found the vax RNA in every tissue of the body except the kidneys.


And we know this from a Pfizer document:


Tables of organ distribution start on p. 16 of 23.

And we know from other studies how the vax mRNA gets to all these organs:


Also it's been proven that the vax spike proteins circulate through the blood. They collected blood samples daily from 13 vaxxed young nurses for 56 days that showed the vax spike proteins circulating. The link is somewhere here. I think Lollipop posted it.

And we also know from peoples' adverse reactions to the shots. People are getting brain blood clots and pulmonary blood clots and heart inflammation and ovary/testes inflammation that is rendering their eggs and sperm unviable because that's what the spike protein does when it attaches to ACE2 receptors in those organs.
@Nemo

So in a regular vax with dead virus particles directly injected, the distribution of these would be limited by a non expanding supply and a non capable particle unable to reproduce like the mRNA fueled spike protein?
 

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
New study: mRNA persistently negatively impacts cellular and humoral immunity vs every other viral, bacterial or fungal infection

Devilish

 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
@Nemo

So in a regular vax with dead virus particles directly injected, the distribution of these would be limited by a non expanding supply and a non capable particle unable to reproduce like the mRNA fueled spike protein?

You can shed attenuated live virus from a vax. But right, you're not reproducing it so you won't be shedding it for long or having it plague you for long.

We know the vax RNA, by contrast, can get into your DNA and potentially not only make you produce spike protein forever, but also possibly pass on with your genes to your kids and make them produce spike protein forever (if you're ever able to have kids after the vax).
 

Ledo

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
406
You can shed attenuated live virus from a vax. But right, you're not reproducing it so you won't be shedding it for long or having it plague you for long.

We know the vax RNA, by contrast, can get into your DNA and potentially not only make you produce spike protein forever, but also possibly pass on with your genes to your kids and make them produce spike protein forever (if you're ever able to have kids after the vax).
great work nemo
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
Lee Merritt, MD, who worked on bioweapons defense in the navy for 10 years, is convinced the Bat Plague vax is designed to be a transmissible vax and bioweapon. She lays out a good, brief, ugly history of research on bioweapons and transmissible vax bioweapons, which seemed to get started in 1947 but really got rolling in South Africa in the early 1980s with U.S.-aided research to come up with lethal germs or sterilizing germs that would target only blacks.

A U.S. operative gave a day of training to scientists at a South Africa Defence Force front company on how to contaminate ordinary items and turn them into bioweapons.

She says successful research on self-disseminating vaxxes really got underway with the neocons' September 2000 Project for a New American Century. In the policy statement for this organization, a Chernoff, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Kristol group, they advocate "advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes" to "transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."

To get to the point, she believes the Bat Plague spike protein and vax spike protein were based on experiments with transmissible vaxxes in Australia that targeted ACE2 pathways in sperm and ovaries to sterilize subjects. She points out that transmissible vaxxes have not been designed to spread via casual contact but only through close contact, especially via bodily fluids. She believes that's why vax shedding reports all involve prolonged close contact and seem to target reproductive organs (results are most frequently extreme bleeding in women or severe health problems in nursing infants).

She also points out that the spike protein seems designed to target specific races based on genetic susceptibility to ACE2 pathways. The safest, least vulnerable races are Latins, Asians, Finns, Amish and Ashkenazi Jews. The most vulnerable races are whites and non-African blacks, then African blacks.

People shouldn't be terrified because we have HCQ, ivermectin, and other drugs that work well. But I think we should all know what our governments have been up to.

Merritt's report starts at 14:39.


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/DJJvTZQxMaNK/
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
So should we all be taking low dose ivermectin indefinitely?

You would never take it daily forever. If you actually got the vax, I would probably take two dabs once a month until someone comes up with a better protocol or you find out somehow that it didn't get into your DNA.

There are blood-clotting factor tests (I'd have to look up exactly what is tested again) that could probably tell you a lot. A blood specialist I follow tested vaxxed patients and found 50% of them have high levels of this factor post-vax, including everyone getting the bad blood clots. He said that this indicated which patients had been experiencing high clotting activity whether they'd shown up in the ER with a bad clot or not. I'm going to look up the name of that test for the people here.

If a test showed you had high levels of this factor, that might be grounds for weekly HCQ or monthly ivermectin as long as this factor was high. If your number was normal, you might not have to take it at all. Or you might take it once, or just once a year.

If I ever started having Covid symptoms, I'd probably take the two dabs at once. If you want to be more careful about taking this stuff, you could always do what they did in Mexico -- get the test if you have symptoms and, if you test positive, take the two dabs.

If you're living with someone vaxxed, and you're having the kinds of symptoms @Brandin was having (lots of headaches, etc.) I'd probably take a couple of dabs every time the symptoms returned.

If you're sharing bodily fluids with someone vaxxed, I'd either use a condom or get serious about weekly HCQ or monthly ivermectin.

If you're not vaxxed and you're not living with someone vaxxed or having sex with someone vaxxed or in constant close contact with Covid patients or vaxxed patients, I wouldn't worry about it unless you get Covid symptoms.
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
Lee Merritt, MD, who worked on bioweapons defense in the navy for 10 years, is convinced the Bat Plague vax is designed to be a transmissible vax and bioweapon. She lays out a good, brief, ugly history of research on bioweapons and transmissible vax bioweapons, which seemed to get started in 1947 but really got rolling in South Africa in the early 1980s with U.S.-aided research to come up with lethal germs or sterilizing germs that would target only blacks.

A U.S. operative gave a day of training to scientists at a South Africa Defence Force front company on how to contaminate ordinary items and turn them into bioweapons.

She says successful research on self-disseminating vaxxes really got underway with the neocons' September 2000 Project for a New American Century. In the policy statement for this organization, a Chernoff, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Kristol group, they advocate "advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes" to "transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."

To get to the point, she believes the Bat Plague spike protein and vax spike protein were based on experiments with transmissible vaxxes in Australia that targeted ACE2 pathways in sperm and ovaries to sterilize subjects. She points out that transmissible vaxxes have not been designed to spread via casual contact but only through close contact, especially via bodily fluids. She believes that's why vax shedding reports all involve prolonged close contact and seem to target reproductive organs (results are most frequently extreme bleeding in women or severe health problems in nursing infants).

She also points out that the spike protein seems designed to target specific races based on genetic susceptibility to ACE2 pathways. The safest, least vulnerable races are Latins, Asians, Finns, Amish and Ashkenazi Jews. The most vulnerable races are whites and non-African blacks, then African blacks.

People shouldn't be terrified because we have HCQ, ivermectin, and other drugs that work well. But I think we should all know what our governments have been up to.

Merritt's report starts at 14:39.


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/DJJvTZQxMaNK/



By the way, at 26:10 in the video, Merritt provided a link to EMA product info on the Astrazeneca vaccine that said Thrombocytopenia was now regarded as a common side effect of it, upgraded from uncommon. Common means between 1% and 10% of people who get the vax.

I went to the link and they had taken down that page and replaced it with strong hints to doctors.

Merritt said the Astrazeneca vax is the one closest to
 

Giraffe

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
3,730
There are blood-clotting factor tests (I'd have to look up exactly what is tested again) that could probably tell you a lot.
Sucharit Bhakdi is saying that you need to test the D-Dimer.
 

Giraffe

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
3,730
By the way, at 26:10 in the video, Merritt provided a link to EMA product info on the Astrazeneca vaccine that said Thrombocytopenia was now regarded as a common side effect of it, upgraded from uncommon. Common means between 1% and 10% of people who get the vax.

I went to the link and they had taken down that page and replaced it with strong hints to doctors.

Merritt said the Astrazeneca vax is the one closest to
Also Johnson & Johnson has issues such warnings back in April.

You find links to the German papers here and in the following post.
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
Sucharit Bhakdi is saying that you need to test the D-Dimer.

Thank you very much, Giraffe!

I believe they were also testing for PF-4 (Platelet Factor 4).

D-dimer is a leftover protein from blood clotting. PF-4 is a cytokine released during platelet aggregation.

They're essentially both proxies for the activity of the spike protein, which promotes inflammation and blood clots. If I got a high test number, I'd use two days of ivermectin or maybe start weekly HCQ, if you believe it is due to ongoing activity from the vax. You can get HCQ from India here:


Average shipping time is two weeks.

You all know about the horse paste by now.

In an unpublished study at a UK hospital, they found half of people vaxxed scored high for evidence of clotting even if the people weren't showing obvious symptoms of clotting, like headaches, pain, shortness of breath. I've linked here to the doctor who organized that study, who posted their results on twitter. The hospital is using those test results to identify people at high risk of dangerous clots after the vax.

Also, if you got wild Covid, tested positive but never had severe enough symptoms to get treated for it, you might want to get one of these tests to tell you if it is still lurking in your brain. Or you could even get a PCR test (though it will give a lot of false positives). Fleming links to a study showing people with mild symptoms can recover and still have it lurking in the brain, creating brain inflammation. If you test high, the ivermectin should take care of it.

If you get a normal number, your immune system likely cleared the vax or wild virus.

I haven't comparison shopped at all, but you can order a d-dimer test here for $98 or $127, depending on which lab you choose. One of the labs is Quest labs, which are everywhere:


Or obviously if you have a doctor you can work with, you can get him to order the test and your insurance will likely cover it.
 
Last edited:

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
Not sure where to put this so I'm putting it here. Jaclyn Hord keeps posting and retweeting intelligent stuff and seems to be an insider:


View: https://twitter.com/Ducky68257909/status/1401969386148270081


She has to keep changing accounts.

She's saying the lab leaks in the U.S. (Ft. Belvoir or Ft. Detrick or both) in the summer of 2019 were leaks of an experimental live virus Covid-19 vaccine to the bioweapon. She's saying they had just stuck the cobra toxin PRRAR sequence in there to try to trigger more T-cells. Note that she's saying it was an in vivo leak. In other words, they had injected the experimental vax into people and it turned out not to contain live attenuated virus but live virus made more virulent (see below).

If you remember, my military contractor friend has said from the start that the Pfizer and Moderna vaxxes were developed at Ft. Detrick alongside a Covid bioweapon.

This would mean the experimental vaxxes are for a disease caused by an experimental vax.

She also retweeted this claim (thread) that the furin cleavage site was meant to attenuate the virus for a vax.


View: https://twitter.com/ydeigin/status/1367758790532169730


Other coronaviruses don't have a furin cleavage site.

"This 'extra piece' is cut by the cellular enzyme furin through hydrolysis. Thanks to this cut, the Spike can bind to a second receptor, Neuropilin-1, facilitating entry into the human cell and making SARS-CoV-2 the terrible virus we know."

So it made the virus more virulent instead of attenuating it for a vaccine.


So either it was an "innocent" leak due to incompetence or they're trying to make something worse look like an innocent leak.

And incidentally, I just read a study that showed fenbendazole, the dog wormer, unbinds the spike protein from this other receptor. Looking for a link. It's possible that most people could clean up the spike protein on their own if you use fenbendazole to unbind this other receptor.

Fenbendazole is another very safe drug for use in humans. See mycancerstory.rocks.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom