Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
I sent this to Peat. This was his reply: I doubt that John Ledford Gregory is an actual person; writes like a construct of a propaganda agency—the view about the natural origin has been going around, coming from sources supported by the secret police.
The researcher just found malaria in the virus, explains alot and proves its a bioweapon, sorry I don't have validation but might google it.The main argument that this is natural and not engineered is because “there would be far better ways to make a virus bioweapon more deadly”.
He is assuming that the goal in creating this was to make is as deadly as possible. This is not a reliable assumption imo.
The goal of designing it, imo, would be to make it look like it was natural, because obviously scientists would be testing it...
The goal here was never to kill everyone off, just to scare people enough to not question suppressive policies.
The researcher just found malaria in the virus, explains alot and proves its a bioweapon, sorry I don't have validation but might google it.
WWWWWWWWhy would malaria be in a virus??????just because it came from a lab doesn't mean it's a bioweapon. Pathogens are studied for various reasons not just for warfare.
WWWWWWWWhy would malaria be in a virus??????
this video is all I could find in my backlog. I suppose one could argue over the definition of a bioweapon but I consider it one whether or not it escaped or was released simply because this form od research is against the Nuremburg laws to protect humanity. Thanks for your input!CLEAR EVIDENCE it is NOT a Bioweapon. So What’s All This About ACE2 and nCoV-2019 (COVID-2019)?
Even Ray says it's not a bioweapon. Gain of function research is common unfortunately.
Can you link any sources you have that validate your claim so I can look into it?