They removed this critical part from the mRNA-vaccine Wikpedia page

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
I have posted this paragraph on another forum in May as proof that even if you use wikipedia ,arguably the most mainstream information source, as your way of learning about the vaccine ,you will read worrisome things.
Too worrisome apparently .

They removed this entire paragraph from the wikipedia page of the MRNA vaccine.

This was the original paragraph:
"Up until 2020, these mRNA biotech companies had poor results testing mRNA drugs for cardiovascular, metabolic and renal diseases; selected targets for cancer; and rare diseases like Crigler–Najjar syndrome, with most finding that the side-effects of the mRNA delivery methods were too serious.[24][25] mRNA vaccines for human use have been developed and tested for the diseases rabies, Zika, cytomegalovirus, and influenza, although these mRNA vaccines have not been licensed.[26] Many large pharmaceutical companies abandoned the technology,[24] while some biotechs re-focused on the less profitable area of vaccines, where the doses would be at lower levels and side-effects reduced.[24][27]"


This is what I think they replaced it with:
"The first human clinical trial using ex vivo dendritic cells transfected with mRNA encoding tumor antigens (therapeutic cancer mRNA vaccine) was started in 2001.[27][28] Four years later, the successful use of modified nucleosides as a method to transport mRNA inside cells without setting off the body's defense system was reported.[27][29] Clinical trial results of an mRNA vaccine directly injected into the body against cancer cells were reported in 2008.[30][31]

BioNTech in 2008 and Moderna in 2010 were founded to develop mRNA biotechnologies.[32][33] The US research agency DARPA launched at this time the biotechnology research program ADEPT to develop emerging technologies for the US military.[34][35] The agency recognized the potential of nucleic acid technology for defense against pandemics and began to invest in the field.[34] DARPA grants were seen as a vote of confidence that in turn encouraged other government agencies and private investors to invest in mRNA technology.[35] DARPA awarded at the time a $25 million grant to Moderna.[36]

The first human clinical trials using an mRNA vaccine against an infectious agent (rabies) began in 2013.[37][38] Over the next few years, clinical trials of mRNA vaccines for a number of other viruses were started. mRNA vaccines for human use have been studied for infectious agents such as influenza, Zika virus, cytomegalovirus, and Chikungunya virus.[39][40"

(mRNA vaccine - Wikipedia)
 
OP
Mauritio

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
Here is proof of the
waybackmachine. Here is the version of the same wiki page from September 2020. You can find the paragraph i mentioned under the point "history" . In the recent wikipedia version that whole paragraph is missing.

 

LUH 3417

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
2,990
The “transverse myelitis” Wikipedia page has also been edited. Around 2017 it mentioned recent vaccination as a possible etiology. The quote said something about how upon admission to a hospital, a physician will screen they patient for their vaccination history and any recent vaccines. When I went to look recently, any mention of vaccines had disappeared.
 
OP
Mauritio

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
This is from one of the cited articles of the deleted paragraph, on the mRNA technique.

"It never proved safe enough to test in humans, according to several former Moderna employees and collaborators who worked closely on the project. "

"But mRNA is a tricky technology. Several major pharmaceutical companies have tried and abandoned the idea, struggling to get mRNA into cells without triggering nasty side effects.

Bancel has repeatedly promised that Moderna’s new therapies will change the world, but the company has refused to publish any data on its mRNA vehicles, sparking skepticism from some scientists and a chiding from the editors of Nature.

The indefinite delay on the Crigler-Najjar project signals persistent and troubling safety concerns for any mRNA treatment that needs to be delivered in multiple doses, covering almost everything that isn’t a vaccine, former employees and collaborators said."

"Yet Moderna could not make its therapy work, former employees and collaborators said. The safe dose was too weak, and repeat injections of a dose strong enough to be effective had troubling effects on the liver in animal studies."

(Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to reinvent medicine)
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
This is from one of the cited articles of the deleted paragraph, on the mRNA technique.

"It never proved safe enough to test in humans, according to several former Moderna employees and collaborators who worked closely on the project. "

"But mRNA is a tricky technology. Several major pharmaceutical companies have tried and abandoned the idea, struggling to get mRNA into cells without triggering nasty side effects.

Bancel has repeatedly promised that Moderna’s new therapies will change the world, but the company has refused to publish any data on its mRNA vehicles, sparking skepticism from some scientists and a chiding from the editors of Nature.

The indefinite delay on the Crigler-Najjar project signals persistent and troubling safety concerns for any mRNA treatment that needs to be delivered in multiple doses, covering almost everything that isn’t a vaccine, former employees and collaborators said."

"Yet Moderna could not make its therapy work, former employees and collaborators said. The safe dose was too weak, and repeat injections of a dose strong enough to be effective had troubling effects on the liver in animal studies."

(Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to reinvent medicine)

Why don't you get an account on Wiki and edit the page back to its original content? Better yet, several people from the forum can make accounts and if an "editor" deletes the edit the other people can try to put it back. I think if more than 5 people try to put the same information in, it triggers some sort of "critical mass" function in Wiki and the editor in charge of that section cannot singlehandedly remove the edits any more and it will go for review to a bigger committee of editors. They could agree with the editor or it could be that the editor went rogue on his/her own and did the deletion himself/herself, so the bigger committee will be able to see the scam and restore the original version, and potentially sanction that editor. The latter option has happened, but more in regards to politically-motivated edits.
 
OP
Mauritio

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
Why don't you get an account on Wiki and edit the page back to its original content? Better yet, several people from the forum can make accounts and if an "editor" deletes the edit the other people can try to put it back. I think if more than 5 people try to put the same information in, it triggers some sort of "critical mass" function in Wiki and the editor in charge of that section cannot singlehandedly remove the edits any more and it will go for review to a bigger committee of editors. They could agree with the editor or it could be that the editor went rogue on his/her own and did the deletion himself/herself, so the bigger committee will be able to see the scam and restore the original version, and potentially sanction that editor. The latter option has happened, but more in regards to politically-motivated edits.
Yeah , I'd be in . Who else?
 

PxD

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
402
Yeah , I'd be in . Who else?
I’m in.

We are witnessing history being rewritten in front of our eyes. This is literally like that part from 1984 where Winston incinerates history and rewrites it.
 

Don

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2020
Messages
368
here are the rules to join up and start editing.

Once you have had an account for about 4 days and have made at least 10 edits, you will be allowed to:

And once you have had an account for 30 days, and have made at least 500 edits, you will be allowed to edit extended protected pages!

For a bit more detail, read on. Or, get started: sign up – contribute to the Wikipedia Project the way that you want to.
 
OP
Mauritio

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
here are the rules to join up and start editing.

Once you have had an account for about 4 days and have made at least 10 edits, you will be allowed to:

And once you have had an account for 30 days, and have made at least 500 edits, you will be allowed to edit extended protected pages!

For a bit more detail, read on. Or, get started: sign up – contribute to the Wikipedia Project the way that you want to.
Oh damn . I wouldnt be surprised if the mRNA vaccine page is one of those protected pages ...
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

P
Replies
0
Views
1K
Peatness
P
Back
Top Bottom