The world’s major stock market indices display a strikingly suspicious pattern of overnight and intraday returns.

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
Check this out, the guy who done this research seems qualified so to speak, somebody posted about it on Reddit, I’m posting directly to the guys website.
This is nuts if correct, it’s blatant fraud.
The overnight market where retail traders are excluded for the most part make the biggest returns, intraday is making a pittance in comparison.

It’s basically information and meaning, use enough leverage to create and impact, you know what the impact will be before it happens and then trade accordingly.

It’s starting to look like the market is a weapon of the US government, the regulators we are told just can’t keep up, they are probably designed to be this way, it allows American markets to dominate.

@haidut

"The world’s stock markets display a strikingly suspicious, decades long pattern of overnight and intraday returns that nobody (other than us) has plausibly explained and that nobody (other than us) has clearly and persistently alerted you to. We use correspondence on this topic over the past five years to show that the silence of others on this issue does not arise from their having a good reason to believe this pattern is fine. Separately, and regardless of whether this pattern turns out to be fine, we have documented that people in a position to alert you to the presence of strikingly suspicious return patterns in the world’s stock markets that nobody can innocuously explain are aware of this issue, have no good reason to believe it is not a problem, and chose to not tell you".

"The second purpose of this article is to document an extraordinary failure in the institutions and personal in- centives we currently rely on for the transfer of important information. Setting completely to the side the issue of whether Figure 1 turns out to be the problem we strongly believe it to be, we clearly show five facts: (i) the world’s stock markets display a stunning pattern of overnight and intraday returns, (ii) many of the people you reason- ably rely on to bring such an issue to your attention – including financial regulators, journalists, and academic economists – are aware of the pattern, (iii) they have no plausible innocuous explanation for the pattern, (iv) they have no compelling reason to believe the pattern is not a problem, and (v) they chose to not tell you".

"The world’s stock markets display a decades-long pattern of overnight and intraday returns seem- ingly consistent with only one explanation: one or more large, long-lived quant firms tending to expand its portfolio early in the day (when its trading moves prices more) and contract its portfolio later in the day (when its trading moves prices less), losing money on its daily round-trip trades to create mark-to-market gains on its large existing book. In the fourteen years since this extraordinary pattern of overnight and intraday returns was first noted in the literature, no plausible alternative explanation has been advanced. The main question remaining is therefore which of the few firms capable of profitably trading in this manner are guilty of having done so. If any of this is news to you, it is because the people you trust to alert you to such problems still haven’t told you".
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
Check this out, the guy who done this research seems qualified so to speak, somebody posted about it on Reddit, I’m posting directly to the guys website.
This is nuts if correct, it’s blatant fraud.
The overnight market where retail traders are excluded for the most part make the biggest returns, intraday is making a pittance in comparison.

It’s basically information and meaning, use enough leverage to create and impact, you know what the impact will be before it happens and then trade accordingly.

It’s starting to look like the market is a weapon of the US government, the regulators we are told just can’t keep up, they are probably designed to be this way, it allows American markets to dominate.

@haidut

"The world’s stock markets display a strikingly suspicious, decades long pattern of overnight and intraday returns that nobody (other than us) has plausibly explained and that nobody (other than us) has clearly and persistently alerted you to. We use correspondence on this topic over the past five years to show that the silence of others on this issue does not arise from their having a good reason to believe this pattern is fine. Separately, and regardless of whether this pattern turns out to be fine, we have documented that people in a position to alert you to the presence of strikingly suspicious return patterns in the world’s stock markets that nobody can innocuously explain are aware of this issue, have no good reason to believe it is not a problem, and chose to not tell you".

"The second purpose of this article is to document an extraordinary failure in the institutions and personal in- centives we currently rely on for the transfer of important information. Setting completely to the side the issue of whether Figure 1 turns out to be the problem we strongly believe it to be, we clearly show five facts: (i) the world’s stock markets display a stunning pattern of overnight and intraday returns, (ii) many of the people you reason- ably rely on to bring such an issue to your attention – including financial regulators, journalists, and academic economists – are aware of the pattern, (iii) they have no plausible innocuous explanation for the pattern, (iv) they have no compelling reason to believe the pattern is not a problem, and (v) they chose to not tell you".

"The world’s stock markets display a decades-long pattern of overnight and intraday returns seem- ingly consistent with only one explanation: one or more large, long-lived quant firms tending to expand its portfolio early in the day (when its trading moves prices more) and contract its portfolio later in the day (when its trading moves prices less), losing money on its daily round-trip trades to create mark-to-market gains on its large existing book. In the fourteen years since this extraordinary pattern of overnight and intraday returns was first noted in the literature, no plausible alternative explanation has been advanced. The main question remaining is therefore which of the few firms capable of profitably trading in this manner are guilty of having done so. If any of this is news to you, it is because the people you trust to alert you to such problems still haven’t told you".

Well, ever since the so-called "Plunge Protection Team" (PPT) was revealed to exist and to be using taxpayer's money to prevent any significant market "correction", it was obvious the game is rigged. That "quant firm" the paper talks about is most likely the New York Fed. It is the only one of the 12 regional Fed members that has its own trading desk and nobody knows what happens to the profit the NY Fed gets from its trading, but it most likely gets distributed to its 4 biggest shareholders - Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup.
 
OP
Drareg

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
Well, ever since the so-called "Plunge Protection Team" (PPT) was revealed to exist and to be using taxpayer's money to prevent any significant market "correction", it was obvious the game is rigged. That "quant firm" the paper talks about is most likely the New York Fed. It is the only one of the 12 regional Fed members that has its own trading desk and nobody knows what happens to the profit the NY Fed gets from its trading, but it most likely gets distributed to its 4 biggest shareholders - Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup.

Yep, why keep the trading desk a secret if it wasn’t the case, the bottom line is the US government justify this by claiming it’s a national security issue, wouldn’t surprise me if the 9/11 state of emergency legislation is what allows them to do it.
 

NathanK

Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
693
Location
Austin, TX
Well, ever since the so-called "Plunge Protection Team" (PPT) was revealed to exist and to be using taxpayer's money to prevent any significant market "correction", it was obvious the game is rigged. That "quant firm" the paper talks about is most likely the New York Fed. It is the only one of the 12 regional Fed members that has its own trading desk and nobody knows what happens to the profit the NY Fed gets from its trading, but it most likely gets distributed to its 4 biggest shareholders - Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup.
From what I recall, it's put into an off shore slush fund. The rest has been a bit of a mystery
 

yerrag

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
10,883
Location
Manila
The intraday traders fight for the crumbs.

Not worth the effort. Better to play blackjack in a casino. House always wins though. At least you get some free cocktails and buffet. Comfy stay and some shows.
 
OP
Drareg

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
Rumour is credit suisse are in trouble, some are saying its a lehman brothers moment, we could have a another bailout soon, the UK just bailed out the pension funds last week.
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
Rumour is credit suisse are in trouble, some are saying its a lehman brothers moment, we could have a another bailout soon, the UK just bailed out the pension funds last week.

There is no need for a rumor. As we discussed in the other thread on the Western financial system being insolvent - there is no financial institution in the West that is not under water, even if only slightly. The record-high debt/GDP ratio, and the derivatives market (leveraged usually at least 30:1) is all one needs to know to see where we stand. The loans/debts are unpayable, even if miracles do happen. The cross-connectedness of banks and most corps courtesy of MegaCorp assures the entire system is so intertwined that it becomes too big to fail by design. The only question was who is more "leveraged" (a euphemism for bankrupt). Lehman went under because it was leveraged 100:1, so it went under first but if the govt had not bailed out other banks they were about to fold too as even behemoths like Goldman and BoA were leveraged over 30:1 and were just days away from collapse. Anyways, nothing has changed since 2008 and this time it is much worse in volume/magnitude. Without bailouts, all Western banks are toast. Hence the pretend-QT central banks attempted to do, soon to be fully reversed back into QE, as in the UK. However, bailouts are hyperinflationary, and as such cannot really be done any more at the scale they were in 2008 and 2020. CBDC do not resolve that issue, it is just another fiat and does not resolve the existing debts/leverage.
So, the only thing that remains as an option (other than WW3) is turning the population into a "raw material" to be harvested. Hence the recent executive orders by Biden and the EU to focus almost exclusively on biotech and AI, with people becoming little more than nameless/genderless aggregation of cells to be used at will. Speaking of which, I think the elite may have had a (slight) change of heart when it comes to depopulation. If the future economy will be almost entirely based on "harvesting" humans then they do need most of us alive...just not very healthy, so that we are desperate for their "solutions". Decimating us down to 500mil won't leave enough human material to fuel their parasitic economy.
Another option, albeit a short-term one is for US to sacrifice Europe (including UK) cannibalize whatever's left of the productive resources there and use them to prop maintain the scam for a few more years over here in the US. We are already seeing this unfolding this in the EU but I suspect the UK won't be spared either.
"...We warned already in March 2017 that the global financial system, which broke out during the 2008 financial crisis, has never really been healed. We noted that it and the global economy were kept standing merely by continuous central bank and government interventions and nearly unlimited provisions of credit. On Sept. 28, we got a final confirmation from the BOE that this truly is the case. We are in deep, deep trouble."
 
Last edited:

yerrag

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
10,883
Location
Manila
Glad we can see the big picture.

When we follow too closely events as they flow in, and trust me, there is no shortage of news, and not just news but freshly sown rabbit holes to keep us distracted and on edge and blind to the big picture, we are made into tiny ants that are made to traverse thru miles of hills and valleys when it really is a flat plain and the shortest distance is a straight line that's a small fraction of a mile.

Then can we truly see that we are merely fighting over crumbs as they keep on manufacturing schemes and hoaxes that prey on our incredulity and positivity that no one can be so evil that he can be unleashed from the norms of decency.

This is not unlike the foolhardy projection of oneself by an animal lover on a wild beast that ends up being its prey.

The difference though, is the beast isn't anywhere near the likes of
one who professes by choice to be part of a parasitic humanoid pack.
 
Last edited:
OP
Drareg

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
There is no need for a rumor. As we discussed in the other thread on the Western financial system being insolvent - there is no financial institution in the West that is not under water, even if only slightly. The record-high debt/GDP ratio, and the derivatives market (leveraged usually at least 30:1) is all one needs to know to see where we stand. The loans/debts are unpayable, even if miracles do happen. The cross-connectedness of banks and most corps courtesy of MegaCorp assures the entire system is so intertwined that it becomes too big to fail by design. The only question was who is more "leveraged" (a euphemism for bankrupt). Lehman went under because it was leveraged 100:1, so it went under first but if the govt had not bailed out other banks they were about to fold too as even behemoths like Goldman and BoA were leveraged over 30:1 and were just days away from collapse. Anyways, nothing has changed since 2008 and this time it is much worse in volume/magnitude. Without bailouts, all Western banks are toast. Hence the pretend-QT central banks attempted to do, soon to be fully reversed back into QE, as in the UK. However, bailouts are hyperinflationary, and as such cannot really be done any more at the scale they were in 2008 and 2020. CBDC do not resolve that issue, it is just another fiat and does not resolve the existing debts/leverage.
So, the only thing that remains as an option (other than WW3) is turning the population into a "raw material" to be harvested. Hence the recent executive orders by Biden and the EU to focus almost exclusively on biotech and AI, with people becoming little more than nameless/genderless aggregation of cells to be used at will. Speaking of which, I think the elite may have had a (slight) change of heart when it comes to depopulation. If the future economy will be almost entirely based on "harvesting" humans then they do need most of us alive...just not very healthy, so that we are desperate for their "solutions". Decimating us down to 500mil won't leave enough human material to fuel their parasitic economy.
Another option, albeit a short-term one is for US to sacrifice Europe (including UK) cannibalize whatever's left of the productive resources there and use them to prop maintain the scam for a few more years over here in the US. We are already seeing this unfolding this in the EU but I suspect the UK won't be spared either.
"...We warned already in March 2017 that the global financial system, which broke out during the 2008 financial crisis, has never really been healed. We noted that it and the global economy were kept standing merely by continuous central bank and government interventions and nearly unlimited provisions of credit. On Sept. 28, we got a final confirmation from the BOE that this truly is the case. We are in deep, deep trouble."
They may collapse Europe and the UK, this may work for a period to allow fascism to rise under the guise of socialism, it won't work for long, the populace is still too smart, they need the military on their side, the military won't do this for long, they will see through it, they are basically declaring war on Europe, folks in Europe are really starting to hate America, this will be the final straw.
The amplifying machine will be ramped up to sell whatever it is they are selling, people have no trust in them after covid, around 50% of the population hate the ruling class so rolling out bill gates and the rest of big tech to sell it is going to backfire.

Wallstreet on parade reckon the FED plunge protection team have stepped in, I figured this myself looking at the rise of equities since monday opening, its so obvious.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals
Back
Top Bottom