Amazoniac
Member
Soaking and washing rice is great because it removes toxins, but you also lose nutrients.
- Arsenic in cooked rice foods: Assessing health risks and mitigation options
I was concerned about molybdenum since it's rich in it. Losses are considerable, but far from making it the vote.
- Risk and Benefit of Different Cooking Methods on Essential Elements and Arsenic in Rice
I wonder how turmeric affects its availabllaibility.
- Cooking Losses of Minerals in Foods and Its Nutritional Significance
- A type of post-harvest loss: nutritional losses during washing and cooking of rice
- Effects of washing, soaking, and domestic cooking on cadmium, arsenic , and lead bioaccessibilities in rice
Reduction of pesticides after washing and cooking, both is in relation to its unprocessed state:
- The Effects of House Cooking Process on Residue Concentrations of 41 Multi-Class Pesticides in Rice
- Arsenic in cooked rice foods: Assessing health risks and mitigation options
I was concerned about molybdenum since it's rich in it. Losses are considerable, but far from making it the vote.
- Risk and Benefit of Different Cooking Methods on Essential Elements and Arsenic in Rice
"A variety of factors are important in rice preparation and these govern the quality of the cooked rice. For example, the rice-to-water ratio is a significant aspect and optimal use of water in cooking involves using rice-to-water ratios of between 1:1.5 and 1:2.5 [10]. The traditional method used in Southeast Asia involves a rinsing step and cooking rice in excess water (5–6 times the weight of rice), which is later discarded [11]. In the preparation of Jollof rice (a popular Nigerian rice dish), excess water is used to boil the rice until a rubbery texture is achieved, similar to parboiling. Thereafter, the rice is rinsed in cold water and added to tomato sauce and ground cray fish, to be cooked to an edible state [12]."
"[..]simple cooking methods can remove arsenic from the grain [20] and multiple studies suggest that use of excess water for cooking plays an important role as a short-term As removal technique, and a decrease in As of between 15 and 63% has been observed in different studies when rice is cooked with As free water [11,21,22]. However, cooking in excess water also results in the loss of nutrients including essential elements [23]. A loss of 40–75% iron (Fe) depending on the type of rice and cooking technique is reported [23]."
"Overall, we found 4.5%, 30%, and 44% decrease in the arsenic content of rice when cooked with rice-to-water ratios of 1:3, 1:6 (p = 0.004), and 1:10 (parboiling; p < 0.0001), respectively. All the essential elements (except iron, selenium, and copper) incurred a significant loss when rice was cooked using the 1:6 technique: potassium (50%), nickel (44.6%), molybdenum (38.5%), magnesium (22.4%), cobalt (21.2%), manganese (16.5%), calcium (14.5%), selenium (12%), iron (8.2%), zinc (7.7%), and copper (0.2%) and further reduction was observed on parboiling, except for iron. For the same cooking method (1:6), percentage contribution to the recommended daily intake (RDI) of essential elements was highest for molybdenum (154.7%), followed by manganese (34.5%), copper (33.4%), selenium (13.1%), nickel (12.4%), zinc (10%), magnesium (8%), iron (6.3%), potassium (1.8%), and calcium (0.5%). Hence, cooked rice as a staple is a poor source for essential elements and thus micronutrients."
For 100 g/d:
"[..]simple cooking methods can remove arsenic from the grain [20] and multiple studies suggest that use of excess water for cooking plays an important role as a short-term As removal technique, and a decrease in As of between 15 and 63% has been observed in different studies when rice is cooked with As free water [11,21,22]. However, cooking in excess water also results in the loss of nutrients including essential elements [23]. A loss of 40–75% iron (Fe) depending on the type of rice and cooking technique is reported [23]."
"Overall, we found 4.5%, 30%, and 44% decrease in the arsenic content of rice when cooked with rice-to-water ratios of 1:3, 1:6 (p = 0.004), and 1:10 (parboiling; p < 0.0001), respectively. All the essential elements (except iron, selenium, and copper) incurred a significant loss when rice was cooked using the 1:6 technique: potassium (50%), nickel (44.6%), molybdenum (38.5%), magnesium (22.4%), cobalt (21.2%), manganese (16.5%), calcium (14.5%), selenium (12%), iron (8.2%), zinc (7.7%), and copper (0.2%) and further reduction was observed on parboiling, except for iron. For the same cooking method (1:6), percentage contribution to the recommended daily intake (RDI) of essential elements was highest for molybdenum (154.7%), followed by manganese (34.5%), copper (33.4%), selenium (13.1%), nickel (12.4%), zinc (10%), magnesium (8%), iron (6.3%), potassium (1.8%), and calcium (0.5%). Hence, cooked rice as a staple is a poor source for essential elements and thus micronutrients."
For 100 g/d:
I wonder how turmeric affects its availabllaibility.
- Cooking Losses of Minerals in Foods and Its Nutritional Significance
- A type of post-harvest loss: nutritional losses during washing and cooking of rice
- Effects of washing, soaking, and domestic cooking on cadmium, arsenic , and lead bioaccessibilities in rice
Reduction of pesticides after washing and cooking, both is in relation to its unprocessed state:
- The Effects of House Cooking Process on Residue Concentrations of 41 Multi-Class Pesticides in Rice
Last edited: