Rinse & rePeat
Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2021
- Messages
- 21,516
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
So, let's start doing that.I want to go into 2022 with some positive plans to build a web of real people, not anonymous (well, me too), that can evade, feint & serpentine mandates, mutually aid, & be together. Who can see things are degrading on a big scale & still have good life on a small scale. I still think it can be done.
I need to turn my attention to the building part this year.
He was on Radio 4's Broadcasting House this morning. I think he is sincere. I believe there is a backlash about the NHS mandates. Dr Steve James has good reasons why he does not want to inject experimental drugs into his body. His motivation could be publicity but whatever it is he did goodLooks like it. Pfizer pills incoming when the routine vaxx idea is suddenly an inconvenience (and enough hesitance/negativity association to the word vaccine) after the masses have enough nano tech in the them to track their every move... and to curb the vaxx sides, keeping them dependent.
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
You know, Old, best comment.So, let's start doing that.
That clip's proven very powerful with some of the most immovable nitwits lodging in my heart.He was on Radio 4's Broadcasting House this morning. I think he is sincere. I believe there is a backlash about the NHS mandates. Dr Steve James has good reasons why he does not want to inject experimental drugs into his body. His motivation could be publicity but whatever it is he did good
Dr. Steve James – Health Medicine
www.drstevejames.com
Let’s hope there are a few judges that cannot be bought.This is all great insight and suggestion, but it is dependent on us being free to live our lives as we see fit. I have not seen any signs yet that the fascist state has loosened its grip or changed plans. The "pandemic" narrative is running out of energy, but all other initiatives continue unabated with 2/3 of people cheering them on. I guess, we will see with the Supreme Court decision on mandates coming soon. If that gets blocked, we may get a break. If it does not...then you can expect 10-fold stronger offensive (and even violence) against the unvaxxed by...the vaxxed. It should become clear this coming week.
Would of been exceptionally bad if it was faked, medias promotion of it tho is highly suspicious.He was on Radio 4's Broadcasting House this morning. I think he is sincere. I believe there is a backlash about the NHS mandates. Dr Steve James has good reasons why he does not want to inject experimental drugs into his body. His motivation could be publicity but whatever it is he did good
Dr. Steve James – Health Medicine
www.drstevejames.com
I'm with you on MSM. Perhaps they didn't know vaccine passport was part of the deal and now they are rebelling? Perhaps they fear the stench of dead bodies on the street? Maybe they know the next pandemic is coming so now they need to regain the public's trust so they can fool us again? Have they now realised that the great reset is not so much fun?Would of been exceptionally bad if it was faked, medias promotion of it tho is highly suspicious.
I'm with you on MSM. Perhaps they didn't know vaccine passport was part of the deal and now they are rebelling? Perhaps they fear the stench of dead bodies on the street? Maybe they know the next pandemic is coming so now they need to regain the public's trust so they can fool us again? Have they now realised that the great reset is not so much fun?
I asked my mother about that film, and she'd heard of it, which is telling since she usually doesn't remember names of films. It's also strange that I've never heard of it. Early 00s were good times, unless you mean that the movies that were getting lots of praise were starting to get bad. I don't know what happened in the late 00s that made the whole industry take a nosedive. Maybe the 2008 financial crisis.I loved reading your comparisons in this Kayaker. I too, for years, have been amazed at the "cookie cutter", poor quality movies and shows that have been getting so much praise for too many years now, at least since 2000. One time I begged to stay home and mop the floors than to go see the stupid movie everyone was anxious to see. With that being said everyone should watch the original "What Ever Happened To Baby Jane". Movies like this one relied on superb acting and storylines, no explosions or shocking sex scenes were necessary to wake you up. Anyways back to the original point, I thought it odd 15+ years ago that flu vaccines were being promoted at grocery
stores, offering $50 in free groceries if
you got one. I pointed it out to many
people that something was very wrong
about that. Instead of you paying them for a favor, they are now paying you to do
them a favor yikes! As they say "nothing's
for free".
I asked my mother about that film, and she'd heard of it, which is telling since she usually doesn't remember names of films. It's also strange that I've never heard of it. Early 00s were good times, unless you mean that the movies that were getting lots of praise were starting to get bad. I don't know what happened in the late 00s that made the whole industry take a nosedive. Maybe the 2008 financial crisis.
I was unaware that they started paying people to get flu shots 15+ years ago. I believe it's because insurance companies have to pay the pharmacy for administered flu shots, and the pharmacy profits so much from a person getting one that they pay people to get them. Maybe it's a scam on the insurance companies, and they want people to unwittingly assist with that.
One thing that happened in the late 00s is that filmmaking became so cheap anyone could do it when digital replaced having to use and develop expensive analogue film stock. Three minutes of 16mm negative film stock, developed, was around $100 in 2005. Then you had to make work prints, internegatives and interpositives etc, before final editing, color correction and assembly. It all cost big money - hundreds to thousands of dollars for a just a few minutes of finished 16mm film depending on number of takes. 35mm was even more expensive. Now you can just buy a videocamera and you're off to the races - shoot as many takes as you want for virtually nothing. Edit, add sound, color correct on the old PC.I asked my mother about that film, and she'd heard of it, which is telling since she usually doesn't remember names of films. It's also strange that I've never heard of it. Early 00s were good times, unless you mean that the movies that were getting lots of praise were starting to get bad. I don't know what happened in the late 00s that made the whole industry take a nosedive. Maybe the 2008 financial crisis.
I was unaware that they started paying people to get flu shots 15+ years ago. I believe it's because insurance companies have to pay the pharmacy for administered flu shots, and the pharmacy profits so much from a person getting one that they pay people to get them. Maybe it's a scam on the insurance companies, and they want people to unwittingly assist with that.
One thing that happened in the late 00s is that filmmaking became so cheap anyone could do it when digital replaced having to use and develop expensive analogue film stock. Three minutes of 16mm negative film stock, developed, was around $100 in 2005. Then you had to make work prints, internegatives and interpositives etc, before final editing, color correction and assembly. It all cost big money - hundreds to thousands of dollars for a just a few minutes of finished 16mm film depending on number of takes. 35mm was even more expensive. Now you can just buy a videocamera and you're off to the races - shoot as many takes as you want for virtually nothing. Editing, color correction, a cinch on your PC. Has this been a good thing for the general quality of the product? Many would argue it has not.
....or the government foots the bill to inject more sneaky stuff to get people dumbed down and sick......
With a report like this it's hard to argue that the anti-vaxers are unscientific.The unvaccinated might be blamed but this data is difficult to argue against.
It's hard to say since I haven't thought about the technical aspects of film or paid attention to them. I noticed a drop in creativity across different industries and I thought that it was ruined because of the increasing focus on appealing to the unintelligent masses. However, that on its own wouldn't make sense since as you say, technology was getting better, and theoretically, there would be more work from small-time studios, or existing ones would save money and not be as uptight. But the opposite occurred. Companies got bigger and bigger while the smaller ones continued to get bought out or contracted and taken advantage of by bigger ones.One thing that happened in the late 00s is that filmmaking became so cheap anyone could do it when digital replaced having to use and develop expensive analogue film stock. Three minutes of 16mm negative film stock, developed, was around $100 in 2005. Then you had to make work prints, internegatives and interpositives etc, before final editing, color correction and assembly. It all cost big money - hundreds to thousands of dollars for a just a few minutes of finished 16mm film depending on number of takes. 35mm was even more expensive. Now you can just buy a videocamera and you're off to the races - shoot as many takes as you want for virtually nothing. Edit, add sound, color correct on the old PC.
Has this been a good thing for the general level of film quality? I leave that question open.
This is the author's profile at Research Gate:The unvaccinated might be blamed but this data is difficult to argue against.