Travis
Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Messages
- 3,189
This seems like a fine delivery system, and wouldn't have the aromatic hydrocarbons that burning any leaf would result in. The die‐hard anti‐smokers give the impression that there is something particularly unique about tobacco; there is not, and burning anything leaf would result in similar pyrolysis products. Even toasting bread results in benzeanthrocene formation, perhaps resulting from the global decarboxylation and condensation of lignins and polysaccharides—vide infra:What are your thoughts on vaping Travis? Sorry if this is already a question you have answered.
Rey-Salgueiro, Ledicia. "Effects of toasting procedures on the levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in toasted bread." Food Chemistry (2008)
Now of course these hydrocarbons are particularly healthy, but people don't smoke for aromatic hydrocarbons; they generally smoke for nicotine. I only post this because die‐hard anti‐smokers can sometimes drive a person crazy, being smug about not smoking while overweight and pounding‐down toasted junk food all day while completely oblivious to the fact that they are routinely consuming the very same cyclic hydrocarbons they are so vocally proud about avoiding. The main objection appears to be lung cancer, but the 'Japanese Paradox' shows that there is much more to lung cancer than strict contact with a carcinogen. For example: polyamines do appear obligatory for cancer in any form—anywhere in the body:
O'brien, T. G. "The induction of ornithine decarboxylase as an early, possibly obligatory, event in mouse skin carcinogenesis." Cancer Research (1976)
And why wouldn't they be? Polyamines are the only endogenous molecule shown to increase DNA replication during PCR; as the only proliferation catalyst working physically it should receive prime candidacy for the final downstream causal agent. Even prostaglandin E₂ can be explained through polyamines: this eicosanoid transcribes for ornithine decarboxylase, among other things (as do androgens.)
Selenomethionine inhibits polyamine synthesis, and selecnomethionine reduces prostate cancer incidence—and this cancer, of the prostate, is the №1 cancer in America for this very reason: The prostate produces more polyamines (spermine and spermidine) than any other organ for their incorporation into its namesake fluid—the seminal fluid—where they are placed there, ostensibly, to later unfurl and catalyze the replication of DNA in the ova (should it get there.)
True that soy is high in polyamines, but extracellular polyamines are quite different than intracellular ones; and cytosolic polyamines are quite a bit different than nuclear ones. Being furthest away from its target—nucleic acid polymers—extracellular polyamines are ineffectual; they also have to dodge ubiquitous monoamine oxidase should it attempt to get there. Besides monoamine oxidase the cell has a dedicated enzyme for this called polyamine oxidase, which converts putrescine to pyrrolidine (and cadaverine to piperidine). So almost paradoxically: dietary methionine and ornithine—the 'polyamine prodrugs,' the precursors—are probably a bigger risk factor for most cancers than the polyamines themselves found in soy sauce and tofu in high concentrations, a consideration which could help explain the low lung cancer incidence in the Japanese despite their heavy smoking.
I was buying kreteks from my friend in Indonesia until customs seized a shipment. Too bad, as I really like the variety of Indonesian kreteks I could get for $5 per pack (shipping included). My favourite brands are the Dunhill cloves, Gudang Garam Djaja, Djarum 76, and Dji Sam Soe (classic).Thanks for the info...I used to alternate between Marlboro Golds and Reds...sometimes Indonesian Cigarettes or Kreteks with cloves. Believe it or not since I stopped smoking, my hair has gotten infinitely worse...wonder if I start up again if I see any improvements...
Last edited: