The Super-Capitalists’ Depopulation Agenda

Rick K

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2019
Messages
1,338
From the article:

"Ahmed told the UK newspaper The Independent in July that “I would go beyond calling anti-vaxxers conspiracy theorists to say they are an extremist group that pose a national security risk.” He then stated that “once someone has been exposed to one type of conspiracy it’s easy to lead them down a path where they embrace more radical world views that can lead to violent extremism,” thereby implying that “anti-vaxxers” might engage in acts of violent extremism. Among the websites cited by Ahmed’s organization as promoting such “extremism” that poses a “national security risk” were Children’s Health Defense, the National Vaccine Information Center, Informed Consent Action Network, and Mercola.com, among others."

I am certain this site is targeted and will soon be shut down. The web crawlers are constantly tuned to the new evasive phrases. Countries like Germany and Scotland have already labelled anyone who questions the zombie virus as extremists and I feel sure that imminent jailing, seizing of assets and children being taken into "protective custody" for state indoctrination are on the event horizon. Mandatory and then forced vax will be here soon enough. We have seen the players being exposed and so many countries including America being forced to admit that there is no proof that covid exists and yet the players soldier on as well as the mass murder by inoculation program unchecked.
 

Freedom99

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
73
Don't be fooled by the indoctrinated Socialist Marxist militants.

BEWARE of the indoctrinated stupid Marxist/communist militants. The useful idiots, spreading lies and disinformation, distorting, militating and helping them in the marxist takeover, and our destruction, This is the opposite of Capitalism and Freedom, It is the old Communist movement, the centralization of power. The Establishment of centralization, and Enslavement under global Socialism/Communism, and the One World Government.

Ps: " You will own nothing and you will be happy" - Klaus Schwab
: You will own nothing = the Ruling Central Government owns everything = Communism = Slavery . That is the true Communism for you. Don't be fooled by indoctrinated useful idots.
 
Last edited:
OP
meatbag

meatbag

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
1,771
Don't be fooled by the indoctrinated Socialist Marxist militants.

BEWARE of the indoctrinated stupid Marxist/communist militants. The useful idiots, spreading lies and disinformation, distorting, militating and helping them in the marxist takeover, and our destruction, This is the opposite of Capitalism and Freedom, It is the old Communist movement, the centralization of power. The Establishment of centralization, and Enslavement under global Socialism/Communism, and the One World Government.

Ps: " You will own nothing and you will be happy" - Klaus Schwab
: You will own nothing = the Ruling Central Government owns everything = Communism = Slavery . That is the true Communism for you. Don't be fooled by indoctrinated useful idots.
Capitalism and Socialism are distinct systems of society with differences in modes and ownership of property, production, distribution and exchange. Marxism defines capitalism as a system of society in which the production is predominantly carried on in private enterprises operated by free wage labor and the prevalence of wage labor, in which labor itself is a commodity, if a defining characteristic of capitalism. In a system like a capitalism there will always be class divisions which developed out of Feudal lord-and-serf and master-and-slave relationships. The road to power in a capitalist system lies through accumulation by addition to constant capital and variable capital.

The Malthusianism of the super capitalist technocrats is directly derived from the capitalist system. Accumulation means an increased demand for materials and machinery on the one hand and labor power on the other. Given the fact that accumulation raises the demand for labor power, what is to prevent wages from rising steadily above the value of labor power until the very existence of surplus value, and with it of the capitalist system, is threatened? When wages rise and the standard of living goes up, they argued, workers will have larger families, the supply of labor will increase, and eventually wages will come down again. The capitalist react to the rise of wages by introducing labor saving machinery or by reducing or stopping the rate of accumulation, resulting in economic depression, crises, and unemployment.

Militarism and imperialism are also profitable. The corporations and capitalists, which control the state under capitalism whether it is democratic or not, profit from producing arms and acquiring the resources of state sanction murder and utilize the cheap labor available in the conquered areas.

The surveillance state and the forced vaccinations are examples of state power being wielded by the capitalists and thier firms to obtain obscence profits by extracting value from the population. (1)

In a capitalist society, under the conditions most favorable to its development, we have more or less complete democracy in the democratic republic. But this democracy is always bound by the narrow framework of capitalist exploitation, and consequently always remains, in reality, a democracy for the minority, only for the possessing classes, only for the rich.

Democracy for an insignificant minority, democracy for the rich- that is the democracy of capitalist society.

Marx splendidly grasped this essence of capitalist democracy, when, in analyzing the experience of the commune, he said that the oppressed were allowed, once every few years, to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class should be in parliament to represent and repress them!

But the dictatorship of the proletariat-i.e., the organization of the vanguard of the oppressed as the ruling class fro the purpose of crushing the oppressors- cannot produce merely an expansion of democracy. Together with an immense expansion of democracy which for the first time becomes democracy for the poor, democracy for the people, and not democracy for the rich, the exploiters, the capitalists. The dictatorship of the proletariat produces a series of restrictions of liberty in the case of the oppressors.

Only in a communist society, when the resistance of the capitalists has been completely broken, when the capitalists have disappeared, when there are no classes (i.e., there is no difference between the members of society in their relation to the social means of production), only then "the state ceases to exist", and "it becomes possible to speak of freedom". Only then a really full democracy, a democracy without any exceptions, will be possible and will be realized.

Under capitalism we have a state in the proper sense of the word, that is, special machinery for the suppression of one class by another, and of the majority by the minority at that. (2)

1-"Socialism" by Paul M. Sweezy
2- "The State and Revolution" by V.I. Lenin
 

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
@meatbag

Yes, the incorrect application of already defined political labels needs to stop.

We don’t face socialists, communists or marxists but a power elite that uses all means necessary to achieve global supreme rule, organized in classes or castes.
It has many Elements from prior known phenomena:
Fascism, feudalism, unhinged turbo-capitalism or stare-capitalism.
It has collectivists elements, authoritarian elements and totalitarian elements.
All those are means to said end.
Real-existing socialist and communist dictatorships etc abandoned the ideological aims soon after they secured rule and became authoritarian systems with all mentioned elements.

I understand that labeling the enemy helps and is a base need and reflex but it doesn’t help to call the global elite „communists“. You already swallow their own counterpropaganda by it. In actual fact at the Moment they acutely try to enlist left-wing extremists to their cause (to exploit them) and they are fooled by it.

In the end, they will owl everything and you live by their handouts however generous or not at all. That’s not communism, that’s not even socialism. That’s only how socialistic dictatorships turned out to be. And there is the similarity: totalitarian dictatorships by a small elite. Strike the labeling.
 
P

Peatness

Guest
Are these articles linked?


Belgium's Van Ranst: Covid scientist targeted by a far-right sniper - BBC News
 

Birdie

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
5,783
Location
USA
I always thought YoYo Ma was a lousy cellist.

Aren't these people front men for far wealthier people? (Rothschild, for example)
He's got a good PR department.
 

BRMarshall

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2018
Messages
237
Control and feedback in the animal and machine by Norbert wiener made this control more scientific and data driven.
We are being herded into systems, they search our data and find our meanings, they dangle information to trigger our meanings propelling us in a certain direction. It means they don’t have to create huge cults of meanings like in the past to get people following, it also makes it easier to hijack grassroots movements or spark them off before they happen organically.

"They now know what we know"

It was Lyndon LaRouche who was really the first to take on this "Malthusian Cult" to which in his work, it was particularly his early understanding of the danger posed by Norbert Weiner, back in 1948, to which LaRouche would repeatedly identify, and to which it should be noted that LaRouche's method has always been about human creativity as a reflection of the anti-entropic reality of the universe. It should be further noted that LaRouche identified the work of Vernadsky again and again....as well as a host of others of these negentropic sciences as important in fighting the dumbing down of science by the oligarchical academies for millennium...
 

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
It was Lyndon LaRouche who was really the first to take on this "Malthusian Cult" to which in his work, it was particularly his early understanding of the danger posed by Norbert Weiner, back in 1948, to which LaRouche would repeatedly identify, and to which it should be noted that LaRouche's method has always been about human creativity as a reflection of the anti-entropic reality of the universe. It should be further noted that LaRouche identified the work of Vernadsky again and again....as well as a host of others of these negentropic sciences as important in fighting the dumbing down of science by the oligarchical academies for millennium...
That’s interesting, the larouche group seemed to have lost their way since he had those beliefs.

Most issues comeback to negentropy, it’s well known and this is why the ruling class control primary resources as much as possible, they also create illusory resources via consumerism.
 

Rick K

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2019
Messages
1,338

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom