The Research Of D-ltocopherol Succinate In Cancer Is Astounding

Pointless

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2016
Messages
945
Ray Peat generally recommends vitamin E, the only supplement with that "general" status.
 

michael94

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
2,419
They treated cells directly. Ingesting may or may not have the same benefits and the complexity of effects goes up exponentially.
 

michael94

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
2,419
Looks good yes nice links. But what is your experience anything to share. That is more valuable. Of course vitamin e is great the issue is getting it where it needs to be. Organisms have structure and usually that structure is impaired... Good stuff can go where it's needed and bad stuff can't leave.
 

Constatine

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Messages
1,781
Why it's not recommended by Ray Peat? A quick search in Google will show dozens of papers showing multiple benefits.

Edit: on mobile and the title just showed wrong LOL. I'm refering to d-alpha-tocopherol succinate.

Here is an example.
D-alpha-tocopheryl succinate (vitamin E) enhances radiation-induced chromosomal damage levels in human cancer cells, but reduces it in normal cells. - PubMed - NCBI
There are so many studies that look at a substance's effects in cancer cells and apply the findings to normal cells. This study could have easily read "vitamin E worsens radiation damage" if not for the competent researchers.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2012
Messages
1,100



This does make you wonder though.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom