The Real Vax Reason (Cast Your Vote)

What do you think the motivation is behind the Covid vaccines?

  • To depopulate by sterilization

    Votes: 179 36.3%
  • To depopulate by death

    Votes: 141 28.6%
  • To have a reason to implant micro-chips in people

    Votes: 74 15.0%
  • To make people sick, weak & more dependant on their government

    Votes: 305 61.9%
  • Freemasons

    Votes: 23 4.7%
  • Aliens

    Votes: 11 2.2%
  • Eventual mind control/Zombies

    Votes: 44 8.9%
  • To really protect people from Coronavirus

    Votes: 65 13.2%
  • Other (please explain the "other)

    Votes: 81 16.4%

  • Total voters
    493
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“2. Millions of Americans have already had COVID, which produces stronger and longer lasting immunity than vaccine-induced immunity, which wanes rapidly. In a study from Israel, the vaccinated were 27 times more likely to get symptomatic COVID than those with natural immunity. Even if you get the vaccine, it is likely that you will get COVID. brownstone.org/articles/a-review-and-autopsy-of-two-covid-immunity-studies/, medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.

3. As with any drug or vaccine, the is some risk in getting the COVID vaccines, such as myocarditis in children and young adults, and we won’t know the full extent of these and other risks for at least a couple of years. For children, the risk of dying from COVID is vanishingly small, so even a small risk from the vaccine can be good reason to avoid getting it. The same is true for the COVID-recovered, who would get only a minuscule additional benefit from the vaccine, if any at all.

4. The vaccines have been widely available in the USA for almost a year. Anyone who wants one has already got one.

Four reasons COVID vaccine mandates are wrong:

1. Vaccines do not prevent transmission of COVID. Therefore, when someone gets vaccinated, he or she is doing it for his/her own sake. The decision of whether to get vaccinated should be based on an individual’s personal risk/benefit analysis - not on the ideas of “protecting others” nor “creating herd immunity,” which these vaccines cannot do very well.”

 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“Development of safe and effective vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains the cornerstone of controlling this pandemic. However, there are increasing reports of various types of stroke including ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke, as well as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) after COVID-19 vaccination. This paper aims to review reports of stroke associated with COVID-19 vaccines and provide a coherent clinical picture of this condition.”

“These contradictory observations are a source of confusion in clinical decision-making and warrant further study and development of clinical guidelines. Clinicians should be aware of clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of stroke associated with COVID-19 vaccination.”


 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“There is an old saying in medicine that “the cure may be worse than the disease.” The phrase can be applied to vaccines. In the current paper the concern is raised that the RNA based COVID vaccines have the potential to cause more disease than the epidemic of COVID-19. This paper focuses on a novel potential adverse event mechanism causing prion disease which could be even more common and debilitating than the viral infection the vaccine is designed to prevent. While this paper focuses on one potential adverse event there are multiple other potential fatal adverse events as discussed below.”

 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“People don’t realize that these vaccines are vastly different from the many childhood vaccines we are now used to getting early in life. I find it shocking that the vaccine developers and the government officials across the globe are recklessly pushing these vaccines on an unsuspecting population.

The mRNA in these vaccines codes for the spike protein normally synthesized by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, both the mRNA and the protein it produces have been changed from the original version in the virus with the intent to increase rate of production of the protein in an infected cell and the durability of both the mRNA and the spike protein it codes for. Additional ingredients like cationic lipids and polyethylene glycol are also toxic with unknown consequences. The vaccines were approved for emergency use based on grossly inadequate studies to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

Like the mRNA vaccines, the DNA vaccines are based on novel biotech gene editing techniques that are brand new, so they too are a massive experiment unleashed on a huge unsuspecting population, with unknown consequences.”

 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
1668785345854.png
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
I think about the image above and how society pays more for “ better quality meat”, meat from animals that haven’t had antibiotics or vaccines, and yet people are lining up to put the toxins in themselves.
 
Last edited:
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“This pregnant woman got the jab and 1 week later her formerly healthy placenta was calcified and prematurely aged.”

 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“Here is what just this
small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:
1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or
breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in
the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an
adverse event and she should avoid having children.
2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was
vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.
This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I
translated to English:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned
direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to
the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care
providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial
participant.”

 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“Bill Gates has openly stated in interviews that he considers vaccines his favorite investment due to the 20:1 Return on Investment; Bill Gates: Vaccines Are ‘Phenomenal’ Profit Makers

"As Gates himself reveals in the featured video, he figured out that vaccines are phenomenal profit makers, saying they’re the best investment he’s ever made, with more than a 20-to-1 return. The one thing that allows for this is the liability shield vaccine makers have been given by the government."

The lives and the health of these people is nothing in his never ending pursuit of profit. Combined with open statements about his global depopulation goals it's surprising he hasn't been labeled a global terrorist; The Super-Capitalists’ Depopulation Agenda

 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516

gunther

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2022
Messages
316
Location
st louis mo
“Here is what just this
small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:
1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or
breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in
the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an
adverse event and she should avoid having children.
2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was
vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.
This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I
translated to English:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned
direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to
the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care
providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial
participant.”

This is a head scratcher here. Why would the evil overlords create something that would put themselves at risk. They would have to know and assume that they would be exposed to the vaxxed. AND, if it was so easily spread, why go the vax route? Why not spray a few cities, sit back and wait. Or am I just smoking too much hopium?
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
This is a head scratcher here. Why would the evil overlords create something that would put themselves at risk. They would have to know and assume that they would be exposed to the vaxxed. AND, if it was so easily spread, why go the vax route? Why not spray a few cities, sit back and wait. Or am I just smoking too much hopium?
That is exactly what has been perplexing me too. It goes back to maybe a “they” are creating a new human species for whatever reason.
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
Honestly I am surprised at their lack of creativity. Somebody else told me this, but the theory is that the formulation had different ingredients based on lot/location. So some places just get saline, most probably had graph3n3 oxibe regardless, and some had that plus r1c1n.

Super uncreative. They had to cover their asses of course, as those are hard to chemialy identify with certainty.

You said a few interesting, and the bit above got me thinking a little further. I thought the different lots were just the big experiment, with saline being the placebo, but it may be more of that walnut trick, where you mix things around a bunch and it it hard to figure where things are at. As far as their lack of creativity all they had to do is evoke fear and imaginations did the rest, like a movie verses reading the book.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
This is a head scratcher here. Why would the evil overlords create something that would put themselves at risk. They would have to know and assume that they would be exposed to the vaxxed. AND, if it was so easily spread, why go the vax route? Why not spray a few cities, sit back and wait. Or am I just smoking too much hopium?
That quote is actually a misinterpretation of what the Pfizer study claims. If you read the study (attached in the linked thread), they clearly define "study intervention" as either the vaccine or placebo. That quoted text is from a Jim Stone article where he arbitrarily defines "study intervention" as "test subject." I can only assume this was done with deliberate malicious intent, as "Study Intervention" is defined on page 45 of the linked study in the original thread-

6. STUDY INTERVENTION Study intervention is defined as any investigational intervention(s), marketed product(s), placebo, medical device(s), or study procedure(s) intended to be administered to a study participant according to the study protocol. The study will evaluate a 2-dose (separated by 21 days) schedule of various different dose levels of 2 investigational RNA vaccine candidates for active immunization against COVID-19 in 3 age groups (18 to 55 years of age, 65 to 85 years of age, and ≥12 years of age [stratified as 12-15, 16-55, or >55 years of age]).

Using that definition, read what the actual study says on page 67-

8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
• A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
• A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
• A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
• A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

And on Page 69-

8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care.

Events would be something like a nurse breaking a vial, and spilling the liquid on her hand. Maybe a relative in the room gets an accidental needle stick. Maybe a janitor breaks and clean up a vial, and ends up inhaling the solution. These are the kind of events they study is referring to, not what Stone claims.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom